Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Back to the topic.

Seems as if Biden aides are coming to her defense. Not too many Harris aides, other than Symone Sanders.

https://www.axios.com/kamala-harris-office-dysfunction-2024-e2f9a9c0-f391-4c1d-8042-aa4f24a292e3.html

Cedric Richmond said this...

"Not one named person. That’s what bothers me most. We’re in a day where the stakes are high. You’d just hope if there’s a legitimate criticism they’d put their name next to it."

Has he been asleep the past 4 years?

It was started by her donors (who were complaining about access) and the criticism isnt even that bad or damaging. It's much ado about nothing. And I say that as someone that didn't like the pick and preferred someone that did not have presidential ambitions for precisely this reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Back to the topic.

Seems as if Biden aides are coming to her defense. Not too many Harris aides, other than Symone Sanders.

https://www.axios.com/kamala-harris-office-dysfunction-2024-e2f9a9c0-f391-4c1d-8042-aa4f24a292e3.html

Cedric Richmond said this...

"Not one named person. That’s what bothers me most. We’re in a day where the stakes are high. You’d just hope if there’s a legitimate criticism they’d put their name next to it."

Has he been asleep the past 4 years?

Seriously! You beat me to it. How many breathless “anonymous tell-alls” have we been subjected over the last five years?

[Anonymous]

Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

Fantastic job? Care to elaborate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

Fantastic job? Care to elaborate?

Her performance speaks for itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

Fantastic job? Care to elaborate?

Her performance speaks for itself.

DP. "Performance" is probably a good word for what she is doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the typical bootlicking WH press corp is turning on Kamala and is signaling they'll turn on Psaki if she keeps it up. Oh, boy.

Wow, WTF is even happening?

Psaki's deflection was pathetic.

It's also unsurprising given that she's a professional dissembler.

Whoever advises her that snarky unreformed sorority girl act is cute is an idiot. She comes across an immature and unprofessional hack. You're in your 40s ma'am, you're not a cute 20 year old ginger who can get away with being a snotty mean girl.

[Anonymous]

I smell a hit job from the President’s folks. They’re trying to force her on board, to row in the same direction. At best she seems merely present. That said no one ever got a statue for being a great VP. She’s just biding her time, waiting for another shot at the White House and hoping to right her poor performance in the previous primaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

Fantastic job? Care to elaborate?

Her performance speaks for itself.

DP. "Performance" is probably a good word for what she is doing.

She is appropriately performing her duties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I smell a hit job from the President’s folks. They’re trying to force her on board, to row in the same direction. At best she seems merely present. That said no one ever got a statue for being a great VP. She’s just biding her time, waiting for another shot at the White House and hoping to right her poor performance in the previous primaries.

actually, she's bidening her time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the typical bootlicking WH press corp is turning on Kamala and is signaling they'll turn on Psaki if she keeps it up. Oh, boy.

Wow, WTF is even happening?

Psaki's deflection was pathetic.

It's also unsurprising given that she's a professional dissembler.

Whoever advises her that snarky unreformed sorority girl act is cute is an idiot. She comes across an immature and unprofessional hack. You're in your 40s ma'am, you're not a cute 20 year old ginger who can get away with being a snotty mean girl.

She's nowhere near as snotty mean-girl as Kayleigh McEnany was. And at least she answers questions rather than slamming her binder shut and storming off the way McEnany did. McEnany wasn't competent to go beyond her prepared binder.

Y'all are just mad because Psaki doesn't take any crap

The difference is that Kayleigh seemed to have answers to reporters' questions, even if it wasn't what they wanted to hear (or the sound bite they needed for their pre-written news story, featuring anonymous sources close to the WH). I didn't like her, but she did a better job fielding tough questions (most of which I disagreed with).

Psaki deflects tough questions with snark. Most of the media views that as "clapping back" against right wing media. Yet doing so makes her look petty in the eyes of many independent voters. She would better serve her boss's agenda if she built up more credibility with viewers (not just the WH press corps who are looking for a sound bite).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

Oh my.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is doing a fantastic job. Haters fall back, as folks used to say.

Fantastic job? Care to elaborate?

Her performance speaks for itself.

Yes, it most certainly does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the typical bootlicking WH press corp is turning on Kamala and is signaling they'll turn on Psaki if she keeps it up. Oh, boy.

Wow, WTF is even happening?

Psaki's deflection was pathetic.

It's also unsurprising given that she's a professional dissembler.

Whoever advises her that snarky unreformed sorority girl act is cute is an idiot. She comes across an immature and unprofessional hack. You're in your 40s ma'am, you're not a cute 20 year old ginger who can get away with being a snotty mean girl.

She's nowhere near as snotty mean-girl as Kayleigh McEnany was. And at least she answers questions rather than slamming her binder shut and storming off the way McEnany did. McEnany wasn't competent to go beyond her prepared binder.

Y'all are just mad because Psaki doesn't take any crap

The difference is that Kayleigh seemed to have answers to reporters' questions, even if it wasn't what they wanted to hear (or the sound bite they needed for their pre-written news story, featuring anonymous sources close to the WH). I didn't like her, but she did a better job fielding tough questions (most of which I disagreed with).

Psaki deflects tough questions with snark. Most of the media views that as "clapping back" against right wing media. Yet doing so makes her look petty in the eyes of many independent voters. She would better serve her boss's agenda if she built up more credibility with viewers (not just the WH press corps who are looking for a sound bite).

Kayleigh only answered the questions that she had stuff for in her binder. Any question that wasn't in her binder, she'd slam it shut and walk off.

Psaki answers tons of questions and answers them well. She's only taken to snark with a few specific people, like Doocey, who ask a lot of bogus questions. I recall the Trump White House giving certain reporters a lot of crap too.

Any "independent voter" who thinks this is petty should have thought the same and worse about McEnany.

[Anonymous]

I'll still take her over Pence