"Why are white men stockpiling guns?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned about one fanatic pro-gun DCUMer who doesn't own guns. S/he will probably show up to chime in.

Not that person. I don't own a gun but have been trained to fire one. I'm female. I strongly support the 2nd. I think this article is probably the funniest thing I've ever written. It's o-so careful to pull each emotional string on the liberal marionette. It simultaneously attacks religion, finances, family, and race and not ONE of you can see how you are being played or consider why you are essentially being told to hate and fear.

An article like this is not designed to engage your intellect - it's designed to bring an emotional response. And there you go, falling down the rabbit hole.

How many of you responding here work for the Feds? And you wonder why the average American doesn't have much respect for you and the work you do?

Because Republicans have been telling “average Americans” to not respect the work Feds do consistently and unceasingly since January, 1981?

Respect is earned

Then let the respect be earned or not be earned without spewing lies about the work Feds do. Look at how the big supporters of law and order spread lies about FBI now to end the Mueller probe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Not just control, but the emasculation of men in general. Now that men and women have reached parity under the law, they are moving on to targeting biological difference and social roles.

The paranoia among some of the white male is bordering on insanity. I'm married to a white man, and he doesn't feel this way, at all. He realizes that white men in this country, and other countries, have enjoyed an unequal amount of power and benefits in the past, and educated progressive countries are trying to remove barriers for the rest. It's about equal access and opportunity, not about subjugating you. The only subjugation that has ever occurred in the past in this country has been committed by white men in power against people of color, native Americans, and women.

So get over it.


Hahahaaaaaaa. That was funny.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned about one fanatic pro-gun DCUMer who doesn't own guns. S/he will probably show up to chime in.

Not that person. I don't own a gun but have been trained to fire one. I'm female. I strongly support the 2nd. I think this article is probably the funniest thing I've ever written. It's o-so careful to pull each emotional string on the liberal marionette. It simultaneously attacks religion, finances, family, and race and not ONE of you can see how you are being played or consider why you are essentially being told to hate and fear.

An article like this is not designed to engage your intellect - it's designed to bring an emotional response. And there you go, falling down the rabbit hole.

How many of you responding here work for the Feds? And you wonder why the average American doesn't have much respect for you and the work you do?

Because Republicans have been telling “average Americans” to not respect the work Feds do consistently and unceasingly since January, 1981?

Respect is earned

Then let the respect be earned or not be earned without spewing lies about the work Feds do. Look at how the big supporters of law and order spread lies about FBI now to end the Mueller probe.

There was nothing neutral about these appointees:

John O. Brennan @JohnBrennan:

When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America...America will triumph over you.

Buck Sexton @BuckSexton:

Remember this tweet the next time someone tells you that Obama’s intelligence appointees were nonpartisan civil servants who only cared about the facts

[Anonymous]

I can do that, too. Let's see who can find more cartoons!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned about one fanatic pro-gun DCUMer who doesn't own guns. S/he will probably show up to chime in.

Not that person. I don't own a gun but have been trained to fire one. I'm female. I strongly support the 2nd. I think this article is probably the funniest thing I've ever written. It's o-so careful to pull each emotional string on the liberal marionette. It simultaneously attacks religion, finances, family, and race and not ONE of you can see how you are being played or consider why you are essentially being told to hate and fear.

An article like this is not designed to engage your intellect - it's designed to bring an emotional response. And there you go, falling down the rabbit hole.

How many of you responding here work for the Feds? And you wonder why the average American doesn't have much respect for you and the work you do?

Because Republicans have been telling “average Americans” to not respect the work Feds do consistently and unceasingly since January, 1981?

Respect is earned

Then let the respect be earned or not be earned without spewing lies about the work Feds do. Look at how the big supporters of law and order spread lies about FBI now to end the Mueller probe.

There was nothing neutral about these appointees:

John O. Brennan @JohnBrennan:

When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America...America will triumph over you.

Buck Sexton @BuckSexton:

Remember this tweet the next time someone tells you that Obama’s intelligence appointees were nonpartisan civil servants who only cared about the facts

You found that one partisan employee? How many people does the Fed employ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The leftists' end game is to control white males.

That's why the academics are trying to lay intellectual groundwork that equates "violence" with "whiteness."

They understand that guns stand in the way.

White people should be armed.

Not just control, but the emasculation of men in general. Now that men and women have reached parity under the law, they are moving on to targeting biological difference and social roles.

Yes. We’ve realized that men are worthless and are not constructive members of society. Wars. Hate. Religions. Almost all atrocities in this world? Product of men.

If you can’t control yourself then we will. GFY.

Real smart. Emasculate and make the men of this society weak and powerless. That’s a fantastic strategy, I don’t foresee any problems at all when we’re forced to recon with those societies that are male-centric.

By the way, I’m a woman and I love that I get to work as much or as little as I want, freeing me up to spend as much time as I want watching my kids grow.

They are already ineffective. Impotent in their ability to find constructive solutions. They do nothing or tear things down. We don’t need that. Their time is over.

Okaaay... so what “constructive solutions” are the feminists and men “of color” proposing that are so much better?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned about one fanatic pro-gun DCUMer who doesn't own guns. S/he will probably show up to chime in.

Not that person. I don't own a gun but have been trained to fire one. I'm female. I strongly support the 2nd. I think this article is probably the funniest thing I've ever written. It's o-so careful to pull each emotional string on the liberal marionette. It simultaneously attacks religion, finances, family, and race and not ONE of you can see how you are being played or consider why you are essentially being told to hate and fear.

An article like this is not designed to engage your intellect - it's designed to bring an emotional response. And there you go, falling down the rabbit hole.

How many of you responding here work for the Feds? And you wonder why the average American doesn't have much respect for you and the work you do?

Because Republicans have been telling “average Americans” to not respect the work Feds do consistently and unceasingly since January, 1981?

Respect is earned

Then let the respect be earned or not be earned without spewing lies about the work Feds do. Look at how the big supporters of law and order spread lies about FBI now to end the Mueller probe.

There was nothing neutral about these appointees:

John O. Brennan @JohnBrennan:

When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America...America will triumph over you.

Buck Sexton @BuckSexton:

Remember this tweet the next time someone tells you that Obama’s intelligence appointees were nonpartisan civil servants who only cared about the facts

You found that one partisan employee? How many people does the Fed employ?

The man is retired. As a private citizen, Brennan can say whatever he wants. He does not represent any federal agency.

Furthermore, Brennan has seen the full set of evidence against Trump and his associates. All of which is classified. No one says something like that publicly, least of all the former head of the IC, unless there’s an avalanche of evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned about one fanatic pro-gun DCUMer who doesn't own guns. S/he will probably show up to chime in.

Not that person. I don't own a gun but have been trained to fire one. I'm female. I strongly support the 2nd. I think this article is probably the funniest thing I've ever written. It's o-so careful to pull each emotional string on the liberal marionette. It simultaneously attacks religion, finances, family, and race and not ONE of you can see how you are being played or consider why you are essentially being told to hate and fear.

An article like this is not designed to engage your intellect - it's designed to bring an emotional response. And there you go, falling down the rabbit hole.

How many of you responding here work for the Feds? And you wonder why the average American doesn't have much respect for you and the work you do?

Because Republicans have been telling “average Americans” to not respect the work Feds do consistently and unceasingly since January, 1981?

Respect is earned

Then let the respect be earned or not be earned without spewing lies about the work Feds do. Look at how the big supporters of law and order spread lies about FBI now to end the Mueller probe.

There was nothing neutral about these appointees:

John O. Brennan @JohnBrennan:

When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America...America will triumph over you.

Buck Sexton @BuckSexton:

Remember this tweet the next time someone tells you that Obama’s intelligence appointees were nonpartisan civil servants who only cared about the facts

You found that one partisan employee? How many people does the Fed employ?

The man is retired. As a private citizen, Brennan can say whatever he wants. He does not represent any federal agency.

Furthermore, Brennan has seen the full set of evidence against Trump and his associates. All of which is classified. No one says something like that publicly, least of all the former head of the IC, unless there’s an avalanche of evidence.

I don't understand the idea that thinking Trump is depraved and corrupt makes someone "partisan." That's just a rational observation that has nothing to do with party affiliation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can do that, too. Let's see who can find more cartoons!

Sure:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The leftists' end game is to control white males.

That's why the academics are trying to lay intellectual groundwork that equates "violence" with "whiteness."

They understand that guns stand in the way.

White people should be armed.

Not just control, but the emasculation of men in general. Now that men and women have reached parity under the law, they are moving on to targeting biological difference and social roles.

Yes. We’ve realized that men are worthless and are not constructive members of society. Wars. Hate. Religions. Almost all atrocities in this world? Product of men.

If you can’t control yourself then we will. GFY.

Real smart. Emasculate and make the men of this society weak and powerless. That’s a fantastic strategy, I don’t foresee any problems at all when we’re forced to recon with those societies that are male-centric.

By the way, I’m a woman and I love that I get to work as much or as little as I want, freeing me up to spend as much time as I want watching my kids grow.

They are already ineffective. Impotent in their ability to find constructive solutions. They do nothing or tear things down. We don’t need that. Their time is over.

Okaaay... so what “constructive solutions” are the feminists and men “of color” proposing that are so much better?

“Feminists”?

We will find out after Nov 2018, Nov 2020, etc. Times are changing. It’s really not that difficult to do more than current batch of impotent politicians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned about one fanatic pro-gun DCUMer who doesn't own guns. S/he will probably show up to chime in.

Not that person. I don't own a gun but have been trained to fire one. I'm female. I strongly support the 2nd. I think this article is probably the funniest thing I've ever written. It's o-so careful to pull each emotional string on the liberal marionette. It simultaneously attacks religion, finances, family, and race and not ONE of you can see how you are being played or consider why you are essentially being told to hate and fear.

An article like this is not designed to engage your intellect - it's designed to bring an emotional response. And there you go, falling down the rabbit hole.

How many of you responding here work for the Feds? And you wonder why the average American doesn't have much respect for you and the work you do?

Because Republicans have been telling “average Americans” to not respect the work Feds do consistently and unceasingly since January, 1981?

Respect is earned

Then let the respect be earned or not be earned without spewing lies about the work Feds do. Look at how the big supporters of law and order spread lies about FBI now to end the Mueller probe.

There was nothing neutral about these appointees:

John O. Brennan @JohnBrennan:

When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America...America will triumph over you.

Buck Sexton @BuckSexton:

Remember this tweet the next time someone tells you that Obama’s intelligence appointees were nonpartisan civil servants who only cared about the facts

You found that one partisan employee? How many people does the Fed employ?

The man is retired. As a private citizen, Brennan can say whatever he wants. He does not represent any federal agency.

Furthermore, Brennan has seen the full set of evidence against Trump and his associates. All of which is classified. No one says something like that publicly, least of all the former head of the IC, unless there’s an avalanche of evidence.

I don't understand the idea that thinking Trump is depraved and corrupt makes someone "partisan." That's just a rational observation that has nothing to do with party affiliation.

Current day GOP = depraved and corrupt. If you oppose those, then you oppose the GOP.