New girlfriend use to be a sugar baby..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Nope. I pay my own way. I'm no one's whore.

[Anonymous]

Since we are on the subject, can anyone tell me where to find a sugarbady? Appreciated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since we are on the subject, can anyone tell me where to find a sugarbady? Appreciated.

Lol there are websites.

[Anonymous]

I had a similar relationship when I was young. He took me shopping, out to nice restaurants, we went on vacation once.
I can say I didn't do it for money, I was very curious to try all sorts of relationships. I dated a married guy, I dated someone much younger and I paid for some stuff for him, I dated my equals, too.
I guess you can call me a whore but the fact is, I didn't do it for money.
I am now married and unfortunately not too interested in sex (be it my H or anybody else). Go figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

So, you were a whore, and you're afraid to tell your husband so you classify it differently. You were still a whore.

I don't know why women always have to shit on each other. You're very ugly inside. I pity you.

Why? I was never a whore. I don't support "the sisterhood" when they make stupid decisions.

Because you're clearly a huge bitch.

Nope, it's because I was never a whore. You can say the same? Oh wait...

NO and i was never a whore and I think you are a bitch too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than the various sad, scorned SAHM's that want to leave but "need the financial support"?

Because the sugar babies are having sex.

Its the difference between prostitution and a troubled marriage. Quite a bit different from both the husband and wife perspective. Men don't usually commit to marriage and children with hookers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Nope. I pay my own way. I'm no one's whore.

This attitude about women is a reason increasing numbers are choosing lesbianism. Relationships are about more than sex, but a lot of men don't seem to think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Oh bull. If you look at hunter/gatherer societies there is very little evidence of this kind of patriarchal male domination of resources that women traded sex to get. Rather, prior to the agricultural revolution, it was more common for resources to be shared more equally among the tribe and for women to be having sex with lots of guys. Agriculture led to the ability to stay in one place long enough for people to accumulate stuff. That, in turn, led to more modern notions of property rights which, in turn, made it more important for men to know which offspring were, in fact, their own. That increased the importance of controlling a woman's sexuality. Limitations on women's sexuality plus the development of property rights is what makes prostitution possible. The 10,000 years of human development since the agricultural revolution isn't, in any meaningful sense, "evolution."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than the various sad, scorned SAHM's that want to leave but "need the financial support"?

Because they are married and have children together dumbass.

That doesn't change a thing. They're still having all their sh*t paid for by a paramour, in exchange for either sex (as someone pointed out, debateable) or for the social recognition of accompanying the other person. It's still USING the other person for money.

You're f*cked in the head if that's how you see a sahm.

+ 1 someone forgot to take their medicine.

You forgot the part about a SAHM that stays in a marriage for the money not for the love. And I'm a female and I don't see a difference either.

Being female doesn't make you any smarter.

In any case, exchanging sex for money is still prostitution. Clearly you are one and are trying to justify why your kind of prostituon is okay but another woman's version is not.

Wow, impressive leap. You should consider becoming a stuntman/woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My advice OP: I'd probably forgive and forget on this issue. Don't ever throw it back in her face if you are having an argument. Consider getting a pre-nup. Beware of any woman who views sex with you as transactional.

My advice is don't marry a whore even if she signs a pre-nup.

You can forget she was a whore if you need to. Be sure, however, that she will never forget she was a whore.

Dude, you have issues.

LOL yeah "don't marry a whore" is an issue I have. How shameful! My other "issues" include not marrying drug abusers, alcoholics, or the mentally ill. What can I say, I simply value myself highly enough not to want to date (let alone agree to a legally binding commitment with) seriously damaged women. After all, there are millions of women in this area you could potentially marry, and I dare say the majority of them have never been whores, so why would you want to marry one of the few who has been a whore?

LOL PP! You are pretending to be a man now to try to make your point. I see you, girl! You're the only one repeating the word "whore" over and over again on the thread.

Everyone, PP is obviously a hideous woman with a terrible personality. Literally all she has to offer is that she is "not a whore." That is why she is clinging to the desirability of non-whores for dear life! Maybe if she enunciates it hard enough, all of the hot and otherwise desirable women on the borderline of whoredom (like the sugar baby in this post) will magically pale in comparison to her nasty butt and she'll finally get a man to appreciate her terrible qualities! After all - she is NOT a whore!

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Oh bull. If you look at hunter/gatherer societies there is very little evidence of this kind of patriarchal male domination of resources that women traded sex to get. Rather, prior to the agricultural revolution, it was more common for resources to be shared more equally among the tribe and for women to be having sex with lots of guys. Agriculture led to the ability to stay in one place long enough for people to accumulate stuff. That, in turn, led to more modern notions of property rights which, in turn, made it more important for men to know which offspring were, in fact, their own. That increased the importance of controlling a woman's sexuality. Limitations on women's sexuality plus the development of property rights is what makes prostitution possible. The 10,000 years of human development since the agricultural revolution isn't, in any meaningful sense, "evolution."

Maybe. But they were still opting to have sex with the guys who killed the most animals, built the biggest fires, crafted the coolest stuff, and told the funniest jokes. Because even before the formal notion of property rights, women have always been (and always will be) attracted to men who can offer them stuff - status, entertainment, material comforts, etc.

Just like men are attracted to women who appear fertile. It's really not that hard to grasp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Nope. I pay my own way. I'm no one's whore.

This attitude about women is a reason increasing numbers are choosing lesbianism. Relationships are about more than sex, but a lot of men don't seem to think so.

You're joking. Look at the number of women who write about the guy needing to have a high profile high status high income job. They aren't interested in a relationship, they're interested in a McMansion and a club membership. Look at the women who encourage others to always have an exit strategy. They lack a certain commitment to a relationship. Look at the divorced women who wrote a couple weeks back about how a man would have to convince them through some herclulean feat to become unsingle again. That's not a realistic mindset if you actually want a relationship (but it's a common one).

A lot of women have very mercenary mindsets. The problems aren't all with the men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Nope. I pay my own way. I'm no one's whore.

This attitude about women is a reason increasing numbers are choosing lesbianism. Relationships are about more than sex, but a lot of men don't seem to think so.

No it's more men are choosing to be gay because they do not want to deal with women. This forces women into lesbian relationships. A lesbian will pay to keep a woman around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Nope. I pay my own way. I'm no one's whore.

This attitude about women is a reason increasing numbers are choosing lesbianism. Relationships are about more than sex, but a lot of men don't seem to think so.

No it's more men are choosing to be gay because they do not want to deal with women. This forces women into lesbian relationships. A lesbian will pay to keep a woman around.

You don't "choose" to be gay. Most men would rather be celibate or set themselves on fire than be gay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women are prostitutes unless they are too ugly to pull it off. Get over it people, it's really not a big deal.

Agreed. Exchanging money/security for sex is as old as humanity and ingrained in us by evolution.

Nope. I pay my own way. I'm no one's whore.

This attitude about women is a reason increasing numbers are choosing lesbianism. Relationships are about more than sex, but a lot of men don't seem to think so.

You're joking. Look at the number of women who write about the guy needing to have a high profile high status high income job. They aren't interested in a relationship, they're interested in a McMansion and a club membership. Look at the women who encourage others to always have an exit strategy. They lack a certain commitment to a relationship. Look at the divorced women who wrote a couple weeks back about how a man would have to convince them through some herclulean feat to become unsingle again. That's not a realistic mindset if you actually want a relationship (but it's a common one).

A lot of women have very mercenary mindsets. The problems aren't all with the men.

Like my wife who is being a major bitch because I want to buy a less expensive car than she wants. This is one of a long string if things over the years that is seriously making me contemplate divorce at the 20 year mark.