New girlfriend use to be a sugar baby..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than the various sad, scorned SAHM's that want to leave but "need the financial support"?

Because they are married and have children together dumbass.

That doesn't change a thing. They're still having all their sh*t paid for by a paramour, in exchange for either sex (as someone pointed out, debateable) or for the social recognition of accompanying the other person. It's still USING the other person for money.

You're f*cked in the head if that's how you see a sahm.

+ 1 someone forgot to take their medicine.

You forgot the part about a SAHM that stays in a marriage for the money not for the love. And I'm a female and I don't see a difference either.

Being female doesn't make you any smarter.

In any case, exchanging sex for money is still prostitution. Clearly you are one and are trying to justify why your kind of prostituon is okay but another woman's version is not.

Wow, impressive leap. You should consider becoming a stuntman/woman.

Most women on DCUM don't want to work; they want a marriage where the man is not just the primary breadwinner, but the only breadwinner.

What these women bring to the table is sex; or at least they pretend to in the beginning.

They are still exchanging sex for money and are thus prostitutes.

Yes most of the time women will go for someone like the OP. Someone with some money but little experience or emotional intelligence - nerdish. It is easier to manipulate men like the op. You can get them to pay for everything. Here is the bottom line, OP is her new sugar daddy. Leeches need a warm body with blood to live.

[Anonymous]

To quote Howard from "Big Bang", when told that the one hot girl sleeping with him was just using him: "Yaay!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than the various sad, scorned SAHM's that want to leave but "need the financial support"?

Because they are married and have children together dumbass.

That doesn't change a thing. They're still having all their sh*t paid for by a paramour, in exchange for either sex (as someone pointed out, debateable) or for the social recognition of accompanying the other person. It's still USING the other person for money.

You're f*cked in the head if that's how you see a sahm.

+ 1 someone forgot to take their medicine.

You forgot the part about a SAHM that stays in a marriage for the money not for the love. And I'm a female and I don't see a difference either.

Being female doesn't make you any smarter.

In any case, exchanging sex for money is still prostitution. Clearly you are one and are trying to justify why your kind of prostituon is okay but another woman's version is not.

Wow, impressive leap. You should consider becoming a stuntman/woman.

Most women on DCUM don't want to work; they want a marriage where the man is not just the primary breadwinner, but the only breadwinner.

What these women bring to the table is sex; or at least they pretend to in the beginning.

They are still exchanging sex for money and are thus prostitutes.

Yes most of the time women will go for someone like the OP. Someone with some money but little experience or emotional intelligence - nerdish. It is easier to manipulate men like the op. You can get them to pay for everything. Here is the bottom line, OP is her new sugar daddy. Leeches need a warm body with blood to live.

Maybe OP's girlfriend had some issues and being a sugar baby had nothing or little to do with chasing money. Kind of like other women who sell themselves don't do it for money.