What is all of this hyperventilating about the Russians?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Leaking TRUE information is not the same as "manipulating" an election. If it was, then every media outlet, including (gasp!) foreign media outlets, would be guilty of "manipulating" the election results. Now if Russia hacked the voting machines and actually changed the vote count, that would be a totally different story. Releasing true information is the way our society works. If our domestic media sources are totally biased and will only break negative stories about one candidate, then that's a problem that I'm happy to have an external entity fix. Bravo to them for doing so.

This is bullshit that does not even pass the laugh test.

What "true" information was released about Trump that allowed you to weigh his (and Republicans') behavior, actions, and temperament against what the "true" information about Clinton (and Democrats) revealed?

Ask the mainstreams. It was their constant attacks on Trump, combined with the utter arrogance of liberals that gave me pause. Add to that, the craziness on campuses, the excuses re: terrorism, and the preference towards immigrants over citizens, the attacks on free speech, and on religious freedom, that had me vote Trump. Wikileaks was just amusement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Clinton won we'd never hear a peep about this. This is Obama/Clinton's vessel to taint Trump's win -- that's all. Sour grapes.

We heard about this all summer and fall.

When did Obama order an investigation? When did he promise retaliation? Was it before or after Hillary lost?

before.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/obama-administration-accuses-russian-government-of-election-year-hacking-229296

The White House wanted to act and GOP leadership, including Comey, shut it down because they knew to gain from the information being released.

Wow. Obama sounds pretty ineffective. If Comey is the type of guy to try to get in the president's way, maybe the president shouldnt have appointed him. Just a thought.

Yup.

Obama should have resigned during his first time, once he realized he was pretty useless at getting anything done.

Well, except for all those times he wielded despotic authority through Executive orders changing the face of America as we know it.

Hey! Obama is all powerful! Who knew?

Almost, PP! Your shtick would work if you were interacting with a single poster