No, exporters lowed their price to shoulder share of tariff, It's in the news. |
Exactly! Perfect timing. |
|
We're taking a look at getting rid of the courts.
We're taking a look at it. We don't need them, We may not need them. So we're taking a look at dissolving them, It's called a dissolving. |
That's not really relevant. The tariff was still imposed (based on a lower price) and was paid to the US government. Whether the base for imposition was high or low is not relevant to determining whether or not an unlawful tariff was paid. |
+100. Whenever someone says he an alpha I just roll my eyes. He’s the most obvious beta there ever was |
| Do you think business will now lower prices for us consumers? nope these sons of b***s are going to keep the prices inflated. |
| He is trying to pretend this decision is a positive for him. Now it's official: he can charge MORE tariffs! |
| Trump skips question from CNN and other legitimate news organizations, instead calling on hacks who lob him softballs. |
I don’t know what news you read, but that’s not the case. Some companies initially absorbed the tariff/taxes, but it led to profit loss. By and large, USA citizens have each paid about $1200 in tariff/taxes. |
Not true. 10% for 150 days. Then that’s it. He can increase up to 15% if he feels like it, but it’s still over 153 days from this moment. |
according to the Joint Economic Committee, American families have already paid more than $1,700 each in tariff costs since President Trump took office |
| Trump's lackeys appear to have not read Robert's footnotes which pre-empted/parried Kavanaugh's dissents which are the basis for the president's assertion to continue the tariffs and add a 10% global tariff. |
What? Why are they all corrupt?!? |
What? Are Republicans going to campaign on more tariffs? |
Lol The Weekly World News? |