British Royals

[Anonymous]

I always thought it was weird that Andrew and Fergie lived together after the divorce. Maybe they just knew too much about each other and both wanted the other under their thumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have never seen the same level of vitriol for Andrew/Sarah as has been displayed against Harry/Meghan.

One literally cavorts with pedophiles and the other is outspoken & biracial. It's crazy to see the dissonance.

Fergie is just lucky DCUM didn't exist during her toe-sucking days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

LOL. And the parasocial relationships with Kate. But, yes to whoever said the Meghan-bashing eventually takes on racist overtones and the thread gets locked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I always thought it was weird that Andrew and Fergie lived together after the divorce. Maybe they just knew too much about each other and both wanted the other under their thumb.

They had limited options and were more or less stuck with each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always thought it was weird that Andrew and Fergie lived together after the divorce. Maybe they just knew too much about each other and both wanted the other under their thumb.

They had limited options and were more or less stuck with each other.

Agree. Fergie is perpetually broke, Andrew still has some residual fondness for her, she supports him publicly and very loyally and he's in need of that, and their previous digs was big enough for the two of them to not have to interact a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

There's more than one poster in here. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

There's more than one poster in here. Prove me wrong.

Did someone just say Kate's fangirls always start throwing out insults at Meghan and at other posters, and then the thread gets locked? Hi, dimwit poster. I think we've arrived at that point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

There's more than one poster in here. Prove me wrong.

So, you have no answer. Thanks for making that clear with the ad hominems!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

There's more than one poster in here. Prove me wrong.

So, you have no answer. Thanks for making that clear with the ad hominems!

So, what do you think M&H will do next? Seems like a visit to the UK might be in the horizon.