British Royals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Wait what were the lies about the bridesmaid dresses? I can't keep up.

Kate threw a hissy fit over Charlotte not wearing tights with her dress to the point that she made Kate cry, the media reported it as Meghan made Kate cry, Kate acknowledged privately that she was in the wrong (per Meghan) but never publicly said Meghan didn't make her cry.

Oh I thought you had something new. Who cares? Apparently she apologized to Meagan and brought her flowers. The RF never makes comments on their personal lives. Meagan got to go on Oprah and say her piece, and Harry got to write about it in a book.

You asked what the lies were and I was telling you. That poster never said it was new gossip and I never did either.

Except they do make comments on their personal lives. Remember when Kate felt the need to issue a correction that she wasn't wearing extensions but had had surgery as a kid? But she couldn't issue a correction that her sister-in-law hadn't made her cry?

Did Meghan ever clear the air about why the Kardashians had to take down the pics of her? What's the difference? and Kate talking about her own hair is completely different than commenting on a feud with another person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Wait what were the lies about the bridesmaid dresses? I can't keep up.

Kate threw a hissy fit over Charlotte not wearing tights with her dress to the point that she made Kate cry, the media reported it as Meghan made Kate cry, Kate acknowledged privately that she was in the wrong (per Meghan) but never publicly said Meghan didn't make her cry.

Oh I thought you had something new. Who cares? Apparently she apologized to Meagan and brought her flowers. The RF never makes comments on their personal lives. Meagan got to go on Oprah and say her piece, and Harry got to write about it in a book.

You asked what the lies were and I was telling you. That poster never said it was new gossip and I never did either.

Except they do make comments on their personal lives. Remember when Kate felt the need to issue a correction that she wasn't wearing extensions but had had surgery as a kid? But she couldn't issue a correction that her sister-in-law hadn't made her cry?

Did Meghan ever clear the air about why the Kardashians had to take down the pics of her? What's the difference? and Kate talking about her own hair is completely different than commenting on a feud with another person.

Meghan didn't because Kim Kardashian did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

Too little, too late. The British equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." Do you live in Britain or have access to their media including comments? The British public is MAD.

You need a subscription for BBC. What other outlets would have this reporting? Depending on whether they knew anything, I would agree their statements aren't sufficient. Maybe I'm not informed enough of the Andrew angle, it's a lot just keeping up with the Epstein stuff at home.

They stripped his title. They removed him from the royal website. They took away his security and put him in the smallest little house they own. They famously don't wax on and on about anything but their actions speak pretty loudly

They sent Andrew to a four-bedroom house at Sandringham (miss me with the "smallest little house") that Charles is now refurbishing for him. Charles continues to pay for his expenses and security. Just last week Andrew was photographed laughing uproariously at something while on one of the horses from the royal stables. Oh yes, Charles and William have really made Andrew pay.

I don't understand why Americans feel they need to defend these foreign royals for what is objectively weak and/or reprehensible behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Oh yes the moral compass that has you in a tizzy about a foreign former prince while you do nothing to get justice for the pervs we have here.

And I'm sure William has his own tales to tell about the prodigal son but he knows snitches get stitches.

Ladies and gentleman, I present an American royal bootlicker. Insults and vague aspersions, come and get them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are they do trashy and why they marry trashier people?

You mean Trump right? He's done the same and worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Oh yes the moral compass that has you in a tizzy about a foreign former prince while you do nothing to get justice for the pervs we have here.

And I'm sure William has his own tales to tell about the prodigal son but he knows snitches get stitches.

Ladies and gentleman, I present an American royal bootlicker. Insults and vague aspersions, come and get them!

Gentleman? Who is the lone man hanging out here? If you don't like it see yourself out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

Too little, too late. The British equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." Do you live in Britain or have access to their media including comments? The British public is MAD.

You need a subscription for BBC. What other outlets would have this reporting? Depending on whether they knew anything, I would agree their statements aren't sufficient. Maybe I'm not informed enough of the Andrew angle, it's a lot just keeping up with the Epstein stuff at home.

They stripped his title. They removed him from the royal website. They took away his security and put him in the smallest little house they own. They famously don't wax on and on about anything but their actions speak pretty loudly

They sent Andrew to a four-bedroom house at Sandringham (miss me with the "smallest little house") that Charles is now refurbishing for him. Charles continues to pay for his expenses and security. Just last week Andrew was photographed laughing uproariously at something while on one of the horses from the royal stables. Oh yes, Charles and William have really made Andrew pay.

I don't understand why Americans feel they need to defend these foreign royals for what is objectively weak and/or reprehensible behavior.

Nobody is defending. We just don't care because we have our own problems. Should I write my MP a stern letter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Wait what were the lies about the bridesmaid dresses? I can't keep up.

Kate threw a hissy fit over Charlotte not wearing tights with her dress to the point that she made Kate cry, the media reported it as Meghan made Kate cry, Kate acknowledged privately that she was in the wrong (per Meghan) but never publicly said Meghan didn't make her cry.

Oh I thought you had something new. Who cares? Apparently she apologized to Meagan and brought her flowers. The RF never makes comments on their personal lives. Meagan got to go on Oprah and say her piece, and Harry got to write about it in a book.

You asked what the lies were and I was telling you. That poster never said it was new gossip and I never did either.

Except they do make comments on their personal lives. Remember when Kate felt the need to issue a correction that she wasn't wearing extensions but had had surgery as a kid? But she couldn't issue a correction that her sister-in-law hadn't made her cry?

+1. Kate has also had her people deny she uses botox, but it's obvious. I mean, lots of people do botox and wear wigs, so why even bother denying? But here we are.

Harry wrote bitterly that the palaces were fighting tooth and nail against rumors that William was having an affair, but they refused to help defend Meghan against racist lies like "straight outta Compton" or accusations about her relationship with her father. In fact, Harry writes that the palaces decided to throw the tabloids bones about Harry and Meghan to get them to back off about William's affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Oh yes the moral compass that has you in a tizzy about a foreign former prince while you do nothing to get justice for the pervs we have here.

And I'm sure William has his own tales to tell about the prodigal son but he knows snitches get stitches.

Ladies and gentleman, I present an American royal bootlicker. Insults and vague aspersions, come and get them!

Gentleman? Who is the lone man hanging out here? If you don't like it see yourself out.

It's more fun to poke holes in your sycophancy, so I'll stay. But thanks!

[Anonymous]

Trump is by far the evil one here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

Too little, too late. The British equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." Do you live in Britain or have access to their media including comments? The British public is MAD.

You need a subscription for BBC. What other outlets would have this reporting? Depending on whether they knew anything, I would agree their statements aren't sufficient. Maybe I'm not informed enough of the Andrew angle, it's a lot just keeping up with the Epstein stuff at home.

They stripped his title. They removed him from the royal website. They took away his security and put him in the smallest little house they own. They famously don't wax on and on about anything but their actions speak pretty loudly

They sent Andrew to a four-bedroom house at Sandringham (miss me with the "smallest little house") that Charles is now refurbishing for him. Charles continues to pay for his expenses and security. Just last week Andrew was photographed laughing uproariously at something while on one of the horses from the royal stables. Oh yes, Charles and William have really made Andrew pay.

I don't understand why Americans feel they need to defend these foreign royals for what is objectively weak and/or reprehensible behavior.

Nobody is defending. We just don't care because we have our own problems. Should I write my MP a stern letter?

You never have responses to the substance of posts, do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is by far the evil one here

For sure, but also not a British Royal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Oh yes the moral compass that has you in a tizzy about a foreign former prince while you do nothing to get justice for the pervs we have here.

And I'm sure William has his own tales to tell about the prodigal son but he knows snitches get stitches.

Ladies and gentleman, I present an American royal bootlicker. Insults and vague aspersions, come and get them!

Gentleman? Who is the lone man hanging out here? If you don't like it see yourself out.

It's more fun to poke holes in your sycophancy, so I'll stay. But thanks!

You should use words you know the meaning of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Wait what were the lies about the bridesmaid dresses? I can't keep up.

Kate threw a hissy fit over Charlotte not wearing tights with her dress to the point that she made Kate cry, the media reported it as Meghan made Kate cry, Kate acknowledged privately that she was in the wrong (per Meghan) but never publicly said Meghan didn't make her cry.

Oh I thought you had something new. Who cares? Apparently she apologized to Meagan and brought her flowers. The RF never makes comments on their personal lives. Meagan got to go on Oprah and say her piece, and Harry got to write about it in a book.

You asked what the lies were and I was telling you. That poster never said it was new gossip and I never did either.

Except they do make comments on their personal lives. Remember when Kate felt the need to issue a correction that she wasn't wearing extensions but had had surgery as a kid? But she couldn't issue a correction that her sister-in-law hadn't made her cry?

Did Meghan ever clear the air about why the Kardashians had to take down the pics of her? What's the difference? and Kate talking about her own hair is completely different than commenting on a feud with another person.

Meghan didn't because Kim Kardashian did.

Meagan apparently isn't happy about Kim's explanation, but she is keeping her mouth shut. Which is smart bc the whole thing will go away, as it should. You don't comment about other people in the press. No good comes of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate has a very carefully curated public image so it's hard to find fault with her. She's milquetoast. I think people forget how she was raked through the press as Waity Katie and for her "common" roots, before she was married. I'm old enough to remember the stories of William's school friends saying "doors to manual" when Kate entered a room bc her mom used to be a flight attendant. Who knows if that's true, but that's what Kate got picked on for.

Now you don't really see anything but a thin, polished, restrained middle aged woman. There's just not that much material there people!

There's lots of complaining in Britain about how Kate's lazy and doesn't use her platform to champion serious causes. Instead she comes out once every other week and did that insipid "Seasons" video series with her voiceover reminding us there are four seasons and that connecting with people is good, or something something. If Kate could go on international ski vacations twice last year (at least) and once this year (so far), she's healthy enough to get back to work.

Diana worked hard, snuck into hospices before dawn without publicity, and used the same platform to touch AIDS patients and walk through landmine zones.

Kate has done what is most important in that she produced three heirs. Don't underestimate how important this to royalty.

For example, the Japanese royal family has a succession crisis. The Emperor and his wife only had one daughter and girls can't inherit the throne. So the crown is being passed down to a nephew.