|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's crazy because they deferred many 4.0/1580s and admitted a lot of 3.7/1450s. this makes no sense because they could have locked down those high stats kids and now they'll lose many of them. They always end up taking the 3.7/1450s off the waitlist but why take them now?
it's going to have a ricochet effect of chaos because some of the 4.0/1580s would have Ed'd elsewhere in a prior year and would have been locked down and out of the admission pool but [b]now they're in the RD pool [/b]which always causes chaos for a high school they end up accumulating admissions they'll never take. [/quote] According to reports from elsewhere, some deferrals say their portal says decision by end of January (which means they're in the EA pool), and other deferrals are saying decision by April (RD pool).[/quote] My kid is a high-stats deferral with a January decision date. Even if he gets in then, he's staying in the RD pool for good other schools. Now wants to consider his options. [/quote] As he should. Michigan just lost him and many like him and took kids with much lower stats. So stupid. It's like no one told them what the definition of ED was. [/quote] I’m the PP, and here’s the thing: schools have priorities. Everyone assumed Michigan’s priority with ED was to get the highest stat kids. Turns out…we were all wrong! And that’s their call to make. My kid doesn’t regret EDing there. If he ends up getting in, it will definitely be a top option. But now he’ll have other options, too.[/quote] But what was the priority? DC is a high stats OOS kid, legacy, etc. that was deferred. Why institute ED if you are just going to postpone everyone? [/quote] They didn't postpone everyone. One theory is that the priority was undersubscribed majors. Who knows? Michigan isn't telling us right now. I'm disappointed my high stats kid got deferred. But I also understand that high stats are not the only thing worth prioritizing. |
T f it has to do with the comment is that one poster proffered other universities, suggesting that they should be as popular and on par with Michigan. They're not. |
There are probably about 3-4 posters from Detroit Metro with kids already at Michigan who pop in. And I think 2 from Grosse Pointe. I live in Woodward Dream Cruise Land, a few miles north of Eminem's favorite road. Of course I have no idea if the others are still here. But it's funny when people know that the governor went to MSU and where the best restaurants are in A2. Naviance looked pretty reliable for our public in-state high school for Class of 24. 3.8 unweighted is a bright line cutoff (most of these would be top 10-15% of class with APs and IB classes). We don't have reliably large numbers of AP classes and only 2 full year AP credits available to 9th & 10th graders. Also, although IB English, History and Language are popular, few students are pursuing the IB diploma. Most of our kids go LSA. A few Engineers. |
| It was your kids major. |
|
I think last cycle stats were about a
12% OOS Acceptance Rate 15.3 In-state Acceptance Rate |
Troll Georgia Tech last cycle 9% OOS acceptance rate 12.7 % Overall acceptance rate |
congrats!! |
Where are you getting those numbers? Umich has not yet published the IS/OOS acceptance breakdown for the last cycle (fall 2025). In fact, they haven't yet published those numbers for fall 2024. |
but why ED? for high stats kids, Michigan EA has never been a hard admit. From our private (in nyc), every single kid with a 1500 on the SAT has gotten in EA for last 5 years (as far back as our Naviance shows), no matter the GPA. And they're deferring these kids ED? Our high school counselor said she. felt confident about DS's chances at Michigan - I'm relieved he decided to ED elsewhere. |
I know of very high stats who were deferred in ED round while slightly above average were accepted. |
| Is the dirty little secret that very high stats kids break their ED commitments? That would explain the deferrals. |
Correct, but it’s not that. After the football coaching scandal, NO ONE will apply to U.Mich next year. |
As the parent of a deferred kid with a relatively popular major, I think this is the best explanation. Filling less-subscribed majors is the very definition of an institutional priority. I also think they took far fewer kids ED than we might have expected. I was guessing they would fill maybe 30% of the class, but what if it was only 15%? If half are in-state, that’s like 600 slots for the rest of the country. Or what if they prioritized Michigan kids in ED, and only 30% were out of state? Again, another understandable institutional priority. |
LOL you are an idiot Penn State would like a word UF would like a word ETC..... |
|
MCPS W school
3.4 GPA Full pay ACT 33 male |