Trump is unsophisticated but shrewd enough to understand power and what motivates people. Trump would not be my first choice to run my company, but I would choose him over Harris in most cases. Yes I would trust him to be around women and children. Any person who manages to be elected President twice has some positive traits. |
I know what the studies say. They're not scientific. I know you trust the authority because the authors have credentials, but the truth is unless one is smart enough, she has a hard time seeing the systemic issues affecting social sciences today. University degrees for folks with 115 IQs has been an abject disaster. But I'll give you a study: Look at the WHO study that says 1/4 women and says sex where the woman has been "manipulated" counts. Uh huh, that's not sexual assault. That's regret. |
That is because you aren’t a woman or a child and you are more than willing to allow women and children to get trampled on to save yourself and your company. I bet you see yourself as a “protector” all the while not understanding that protecting your money and power isn’t anything but self serving. Trump isn’t really shrewd and you will hate my post because it IS shrewd. |
Love how no one explains why Christine Ford's allegations were likely bogus and instead shriek at the poster for noticing. And I do not support your view of women that women will lie to men if the men do not agree with them. Maybe you do that, but not all women are like that. In my experience, however, women lie when they want to distract from their own misconduct. If you start pulling at that thread, you end up with Christine Ford-like stories, which is probably why you are attacking me instead of engaging in debate. |
Np here. Wow. Why exactly would you choose him over Harris? |
I really really really hope you do not have a daughter. |
NP. I absolutely chose him over Harris and would do so again. Multiple reasons, the border and immigration being number one. But right up there is his halting of the madness of "gender care" for minors, and his support for keeping men out of women's sports and spaces. |
You are proving my point over and over again.
I’m not saying the women in your life are always lying to you. I’m saying if you ask directly about the topic of sexual assault, a woman in your life will not answer you that they have experienced that even if you have. You are saying “women lie when they want to distract from their own misconduct”. Which is just like saying “she was assaulted because her skirt was too short and a man saw her breasts and was unable to control himself because of misconduct” Bye now- we are just going to continue to disagree and this conversation can only devolve from here. |
I mean, there are always going to be the worst of people. Congrats, you are one of them. We can’t make you better. *shrug* |
Do men need all of society to support them in their ability to manage themselves around women? Your argument is predicated on the idea that men are infantile beings who need physical barriers to keep themselves from attacking women. Maybe instead of just enabling your fellow men to be snowflakes and melt all reason away to impulses around women, you could also try telling men they should control themselves. |
Or a son. We don’t need another abuser. |
Gender care for minors and men in women’s sports? Such small numbers. Your post smacks of no empathy for anyone different than yourself. How sad. |
This is a troll. |
PP was referring the the original question about choosing Trump to run your company, not choosing him in an election scenario. |
A large number of the Venezuelan immigrants recently released from maximum security prison in El Salvador were LEGAL immigrants, not illegal, and have never been accused of any crime. They came to the US legally and were following the rules diligently, without doing anything wrong, and the Trump administration gathered them up and deported them to a concentration camp, where they were abused on a daily basis. Why don't you object to these atrocities? |