2025 High School Boys DMV Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?

It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.

You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?

1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.

I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.

Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse

The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.

It will be interesting to watch the Yorktown v. Heights game when the two attack 27's go head to head.

[Anonymous]

How many midyear transfers did St. John’s bring in?

[Anonymous]

Prep brought in more

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many midyear transfers did St. John’s bring in?

Zero like always

[Anonymous]

All this talk about SJC aggressively recruiting when Prep is equally aggressive.

Mid Year Transfers, and re-classifying boarding recruits are the norm now at the Rockville Pike school.

[Anonymous]

DC private school pumpers whining about recruiting is peak irony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All this talk about SJC aggressively recruiting when Prep is equally aggressive.

Mid Year Transfers, and re-classifying boarding recruits are the norm now at the Rockville Pike school.

r

IAC always pointing fingers to try to hide what they do.

[Anonymous]

Not the IAC, just one school. Landon has zero boarding, same with SSSA, Bullis and StA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not the IAC, just one school. Landon has zero boarding, same with SSSA, Bullis and StA.

So 2 schools. 6 - 4 = 2.

On brand needing the math help, tho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?

It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.

You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?

1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.

I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.

Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse

The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.

Nobody cares Margaret. Heights is an irrelevant lax program

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All this talk about SJC aggressively recruiting when Prep is equally aggressive.

Mid Year Transfers, and re-classifying boarding recruits are the norm now at the Rockville Pike school.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?

It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.

You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?

1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.

I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.

Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse

The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.

Nobody cares Margaret. Heights is an irrelevant lax program

??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?

It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.

You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?

1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.

I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.

Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse

The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.

Nobody cares Margaret. Heights is an irrelevant lax program

??

Is Margaret the name that you project as a typical Heights Mom? (I might have said Mary Catherine or Regina, but I get your point). The Heights is only irrelevant if your definition of "relevant" is the very top private schools. Perhaps someone should start a Big Five thread for the "relevant" schools, i.e., Landon, Bullis, St. Johns, Gonzaga, and Prep, so the Dads of the super studs (and Dads of all the bench warmers) at those schools can flex without having to hear about the "irrelevant" schools and players?

[Anonymous]

Pretty sure that episcopal isn’t doing any major recruiting based on their last 5 years records lol. Nice try though WCAC daddy

[Anonymous]

The Heights 2027 attack will be the player of the year next year or his senior year.