Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2025 High School Boys DMV Lacrosse"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?[/quote]It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league. You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics? [/quote] 1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse. I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates. [/quote] Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse [/quote] The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year. [/quote] Nobody cares Margaret. Heights is an irrelevant lax program[/quote] ??[/quote] Is Margaret the name that you project as a typical Heights Mom? (I might have said Mary Catherine or Regina, but I get your point). The Heights is only irrelevant if your definition of "relevant" is the very top private schools. Perhaps someone should start a Big Five thread for the "relevant" schools, i.e., Landon, Bullis, St. Johns, Gonzaga, and Prep, so the Dads of the super studs (and Dads of all the bench warmers) at those schools can flex without having to hear about the "irrelevant" schools and players? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics