Deportation impact

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

With so many federal connected jobs in Fairfax county it should be a requirement by your security clearance to report suspicious undocumented or risk losing your job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

Right. ICE. Not a county resource.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

Great, then let's send back every immigrant and their children with family who did not flee war or genocide. That's everyone with family from Poland, Italy, Ireland, Germany, and more. 99% of us would have to leave. Or are these rules only applicable to everyone but YOU?

Did you miss the question? It says assulym seekers those European countries are not phoney assulym seekers, idiot

Yes, European country immigrants were not asylum seekers. But they didn't come from war or genocide and in fact, contributed to the genocide or benefitted from the genocide of the rightful owners of the land we currently all live on. Send everyone back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

By definition, TPS has an expiration date. If a future administration doesn't want to renew the TPS criteria for El Salvador in March 2025, they are within their rights. However, the conversation is about whether folks who have TPS are "documented." They are. By definition, they are documented and therefore not the business of ICE.

Wrong. The current administration fraudulently classified them as documented they should be deported immediately

They literally received documents from the US government. You may disagree with the decision, but that doesn't make it fraud. The word of the United States needs to actually mean something, both for moral reasons but also for legal ones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

With so many federal connected jobs in Fairfax county it should be a requirement by your security clearance to report suspicious undocumented or risk losing your job.

What makes someone a "suspicious undocumented" to your mind? What makes someone suspicious, exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

Right. ICE. Not a county resource.

Reporting today suggests he's going to declare a national emergency and get the military involved in mass deportations so it won't just be ICE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

Right. ICE. Not a county resource.

Reporting today suggests he's going to declare a national emergency and get the military involved in mass deportations so it won't just be ICE.

Link to an exact quote, please? Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

Right. ICE. Not a county resource.

Reporting today suggests he's going to declare a national emergency and get the military involved in mass deportations so it won't just be ICE.

Link to an exact quote, please? Thank you.

https://wapo.st/48RwQLH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

By definition, TPS has an expiration date. If a future administration doesn't want to renew the TPS criteria for El Salvador in March 2025, they are within their rights. However, the conversation is about whether folks who have TPS are "documented." They are. By definition, they are documented and therefore not the business of ICE.

TPS can be removed at any time by the president. Biden is only here until January.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

so if someone has an asylum visa and they are from El Salvador, are they still eligible for asylum given that the President of the country has rounded up significant number of gang members and criminals and put them in jail? Weren't they at one point bragging their murder rate was lower in the US? What is the basis for the asylum claim? That the person is a gang member and fears they will be imprisoned upon return??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

Right. ICE. Not a county resource.

No one has said the county would use resources. But they also can't stop it from happening. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

so if someone has an asylum visa and they are from El Salvador, are they still eligible for asylum given that the President of the country has rounded up significant number of gang members and criminals and put them in jail? Weren't they at one point bragging their murder rate was lower in the US? What is the basis for the asylum claim? That the person is a gang member and fears they will be imprisoned upon return??[/quote]



But seriously El Salvador has really cleaned up in the last few years and it is now considered one of the safer places in the world. Their TPS shouldn't even be valid anymore but look like it runs out in March.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

so if someone has an asylum visa and they are from El Salvador, are they still eligible for asylum given that the President of the country has rounded up significant number of gang members and criminals and put them in jail? Weren't they at one point bragging their murder rate was lower in the US? What is the basis for the asylum claim? That the person is a gang member and fears they will be imprisoned upon return??

One of the provisions of the bipartisan immigration bill was to fund more asylum officers to start to move through the backlog and either approve or deny these applications. Yes, asylum can (and sometimes should) be denied, and TPS can (and should) be ended. We had a bill that would have allowed that process to move along and get folks back to their homes of origin if their claim was not warranted. But Trump et al torpedoed the bipartisan bill because it would have denied them a campaign talking point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is the likely impact of Trump deportations on Falls Church and Justice high schools?

I don't think deportations will really happen like he is saying. I think it will be more similar to those under the Obama administration and focus mostly on criminals.

I am more concerned with what will happen when they get rid of the Dept of Education and cut Title 1 and Head start funding. That will have a huge impact on the elementary school that feed into these HS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

With so many federal connected jobs in Fairfax county it should be a requirement by your security clearance to report suspicious undocumented or risk losing your job.

What makes someone a "suspicious undocumented" to your mind? What makes someone suspicious, exactly?

The men standing outside the library.