Deportation impact

[Anonymous]

hello all please note that fairfax county is designated a sanctuary city. this is going to stop and needs to stop. so be it.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/fairness-justice/3149034/fairfax-county-politicians-dont-want-us-know-sanctuary-policy-danger/

[Anonymous]

Fairfax County may be a sanctuary city but I'm curious how impactful that will be given the Republican governor.

[Anonymous]

It stands that with both a Republican President and a Republican Governor people at the national and state levels are going to try and pull whatever levers they can to cut off funding to Fairfax unless Fairfax cooperates fully with immigration officials. Fairfax likes to flaunt Republican policies whenever it can and now some folks are going to look to reciprocate.

[Anonymous]

Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fear for these poor children and their families. They have already endured so much and the vast majority are law abiding. There’s been so much fear mongering about our immigrant communities.

Yup and the majority of their kids are respectful and want to learn unlike a lot of the entitled rich kids who whine and complain about everything. Their entitled parents who run to the principal any time a teacher tells their child no or that their behavior is inappropriate because you know they are "involved" in the PTA

Huh? What are you drinking on about? The reason this happens is because the schools are over run by esol undocumented that the school doesn't focus on the standard middle of the road kids. The fact that undocumented don't contribute to the community by PTA volunteering is also a tell tale sign.

LOL sure are you trying to convince us or yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

Great, then let's send back every immigrant and their children with family who did not flee war or genocide. That's everyone with family from Poland, Italy, Ireland, Germany, and more. 99% of us would have to leave. Or are these rules only applicable to everyone but YOU?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

Great, then let's send back every immigrant and their children with family who did not flee war or genocide. That's everyone with family from Poland, Italy, Ireland, Germany, and more. 99% of us would have to leave. Or are these rules only applicable to everyone but YOU?

Did you miss the question? It says assulym seekers those European countries are not phoney assulym seekers, idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

By definition, TPS has an expiration date. If a future administration doesn't want to renew the TPS criteria for El Salvador in March 2025, they are within their rights. However, the conversation is about whether folks who have TPS are "documented." They are. By definition, they are documented and therefore not the business of ICE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

By definition, TPS has an expiration date. If a future administration doesn't want to renew the TPS criteria for El Salvador in March 2025, they are within their rights. However, the conversation is about whether folks who have TPS are "documented." They are. By definition, they are documented and therefore not the business of ICE.

Wrong. The current administration fraudulently classified them as documented they should be deported immediately

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

If they are here without permission they are by definition not law abiding. Everyone here without permission is eligible for deportation. That's what people voted for two weeks ago without any doubt. Fairfax county can't do anything to stop someone from being deported.

DP
I agree with you. As another poster said though, they can’t stop deportation but it doesn’t mean that Fairfax County has to use its resources to assist.

Fairfax county is so close to the nations capital that it is required to report status and it's not a far distance for ice to come get the criminals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin hasn't done squat on this issue so don't expect him to start now.

Fairfax may be a sanctuary jurisdiction but there is nothing they can do to stop students from being deported.

Again, most of the school-aged kids are either US citizens or hold asylum visas. Moreover, being a sanctuary city means that Fairfax won't use municipal/county resources to aid and abet ICE in rounding up law-abiding residents. So either ICE has to get big enough to take care of this themselves, or they can do what they are supposed to be doing and focus on criminals.

These asylum visas are phony, plain and simple. The majority of South American countries are not in crisis, and the criteria under which migrants from these countries are claiming asylum have largely been fabricated by the Biden administration. True asylum cases involve individuals fleeing active wars or genocides, not generalized violence or economic instability. For example, asylum seekers from war zones like Gaza, Sudan, or countries experiencing severe crises like the Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar are legitimate cases under international law. These populations face imminent danger and persecution, qualifying them for asylum. However, these are not the populations filling communities like Fairfax County.

The migrants in Fairfax County primarily come from South American countries such as Venezuela, Honduras, or El Salvador. While these nations face challenges, they are not engulfed in wars or genocides. The Biden administration’s policies have significantly broadened asylum criteria to include situations like economic hardship, gang violence, or domestic issues, which do not meet the traditional standards for asylum. These standards were originally designed to protect individuals facing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a specific social group—not individuals fleeing poverty or crime.

This shift in policy is no accident. Biden’s political appointees at DHS and the State expanded Temporary Protected Status and asylum eligibility to countries that do not meet the strict definitions required under the law. By labeling countries as "in crisis" without clear justification, they’ve created a loophole allowing mass entry of migrants who would otherwise not qualify. This influx stretches resources in places like Fairfax County, where migrants under these questionable asylum claims are now part of the community.

True asylum should be reserved for those fleeing genuine crises like active wars and genocides—not for migrants from countries where no such conditions exist. A future administration would be well within its rights to revoke these expanded criteria and restore integrity to the asylum system by focusing on legitimate cases of persecution and humanitarian need.

By definition, TPS has an expiration date. If a future administration doesn't want to renew the TPS criteria for El Salvador in March 2025, they are within their rights. However, the conversation is about whether folks who have TPS are "documented." They are. By definition, they are documented and therefore not the business of ICE.

Wrong. The current administration fraudulently classified them as documented they should be deported immediately

DP
Is this opinion or is there a definitive classification you can cite?