Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Walz. That's all. I'm nervous and anxious about tomorrow. I was also crazy nervous and anxious before the Harris-Trump debate. I hope it goes well for Walz.

I don't expect Walz to out-debate the smooth, law school graduate Vance. But I know that Walz is right in terms of substance so I'm going to vote Harris-Walz regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Vance may be the most despicable politician in recent memory. He's so misogynist and casually cruel and I'll never forgive him for his comments about women, against Haitian immigrants or his obsession with women as breeders and post-menopausal women as purposeless.

A decade or two of keeping children in line is more debate preparation than a DEI law school admit.

Harris went to a law school with an average LSAT score of 152. Clearly she would have attended somewhere other than UC SF if she were even remotely capable. The fact that she couldn’t get in anywhere else is a clear indication of her poor performance. Walz went to Chadron state for an education degree. Obviously, neither of them are high quality candidates.

LOL, DYK how many HLS grads I know who really are as unremarkable as the corporate lawyers in my hometown? They simply live in DC. Yeah, they may make more money, but they are as equally unimpressive.

And your criticism here obviously speaks volumes about the elite attitudes the GOP supposedly despises. My guess is you're also one of those bicoastal elites with disdain for the flyover folks. Kudos to Walz for serving his country and attending a public university on his benefits, following in his then recently deceased father's foot steps.

PP, guessing there is envy here that the ROI in your elite education background pales in comparison to what Harris and Walz have accomplished with theirs.

Lol, you are making a lot of assumptions about me. I just want someone comparable to Obama or Clinton, as a candidate. Not these low IQ midwits we currently have running for office.

That's deft. You are aware that Obama has been lampooned over and again about being an East Coast elite asking for Grey Poupon for his sandwich. So the elites are back in?

Neither Harris or Walz are low IQ midwits. You are stewing in your Fairfax townhouse while both of them have been elected to statewide offices multiple times.

Once again you resort to insulting me because I made a statement you dislike about a candidate. If this statement were not true then why bother responding to it? The quality of presidential candidates has decline precipitously over the past decade. Biden, Trump and Harris, are all low IQ or mentally unstable. They do not come close to intellect that Obama, Romney, McCain or Clinton have.

You clearly do not know folks who are genuinely low IQ though I will give you - as do many, many mental health professionals - that Trump is mentally unstable.

Bushes went to Yale and the son certainly didn't distinguish himself in the intellectual realm. What was the phrase used to describe him - ignorant by indifference and inclination.

Finally, Biden, Harris, and Walz all appear to have high emotional EQ and, to go with your reasoning, it clearly complements whatever "deficits" they may have in intellect.

I guess there's a finally finally: there are a lot of folks at their state universities. Some attend their flagships, others live at home and attend their regional university. Every year Ivy grads show up at Big Ten law schools, especially Michigan, and assume they are superior to all the other students. The honest ones admit, after the first exam, that the classmates who are public school uni grads are their peers, if not their superiors, in the classroom. Many attend Big Ten schools, etc as that is what their families can afford. As Frank Bruni says, "where you go is not who you'll be."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

Now do the party that refused to take up HR2.
Yes, the 2023 Border bill passed by the house that the senate never looked at. It was passed 1 year before the senate bill and was much better and tougher than the senate bill.

Buy you forgot about HR2? Or just don’t mention it as it does not fit your narrative.

HR2 is a performative bill that doesn't address most of the critical issues, but your right wing echo-chamber doesn't tell you that.

Oh yes, it addresses the most critical issues. It doesn't address your ideology of open borders and the redistribution of income in the name of social "justice".

LOL. No Dems have an open border bill. None. Nada. Zilch. And I can't help you if the rich paying their fair share of taxes, similar to their office manager, triggers you. Perhaps Russia would be more suitable for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz has lowered his own expectations, but that’s just a tactic. He’s not the clown/moron/zero his political opponents claim that he is. Far from it.

I expect Walz to focus on Trump and Vance to focus on Harris. That’s a win for Walz.

Walz will call Vance weird. The words “mind yer own business” will be spoken. So will “reproductive freedom.”

Vance will rattle off a list of what he sees as Walz’s biographical embellishments.

Have you seen Walz jump around on stage with the open hands, goofy grinning and mannerisms? He's the very definition of a clown.

I liked the campaign ad of him working on his auto engine with totally clean hands. Is there a single authentic thing about Walz?

Should he have first dirtied his hands?

The guy is out campaigning, he's not working on his car. That doesn't mean he never works on his car.

[Anonymous]

Walz will definitely not be as good as Harris was.

Vance seems very gleeful and excited to debate Walz. So I assume he is feeling very confident.

Walz has said multiple times he's not a great debater.

I just hope that the debate shows viewers some actual authenticity of both men's characters - and not just overly negative gotcha moments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Walz. That's all. I'm nervous and anxious about tomorrow. I was also crazy nervous and anxious before the Harris-Trump debate. I hope it goes well for Walz.

I don't expect Walz to out-debate the smooth, law school graduate Vance. But I know that Walz is right in terms of substance so I'm going to vote Harris-Walz regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Vance may be the most despicable politician in recent memory. He's so misogynist and casually cruel and I'll never forgive him for his comments about women, against Haitian immigrants or his obsession with women as breeders and post-menopausal women as purposeless.

A decade or two of keeping children in line is more debate preparation than a DEI law school admit.

Harris went to a law school with an average LSAT score of 152. Clearly she would have attended somewhere other than UC SF if she were even remotely capable. The fact that she couldn’t get in anywhere else is a clear indication of her poor performance. Walz went to Chadron state for an education degree. Obviously, neither of them are high quality candidates.

LOL, DYK how many HLS grads I know who really are as unremarkable as the corporate lawyers in my hometown? They simply live in DC. Yeah, they may make more money, but they are as equally unimpressive.

And your criticism here obviously speaks volumes about the elite attitudes the GOP supposedly despises. My guess is you're also one of those bicoastal elites with disdain for the flyover folks. Kudos to Walz for serving his country and attending a public university on his benefits, following in his then recently deceased father's foot steps.

PP, guessing there is envy here that the ROI in your elite education background pales in comparison to what Harris and Walz have accomplished with theirs.

Lol, you are making a lot of assumptions about me. I just want someone comparable to Obama or Clinton, as a candidate. Not these low IQ midwits we currently have running for office.

That's deft. You are aware that Obama has been lampooned over and again about being an East Coast elite asking for Grey Poupon for his sandwich. So the elites are back in?

Neither Harris or Walz are low IQ midwits. You are stewing in your Fairfax townhouse while both of them have been elected to statewide offices multiple times.

Once again you resort to insulting me because I made a statement you dislike about a candidate. If this statement were not true then why bother responding to it? The quality of presidential candidates has decline precipitously over the past decade. Biden, Trump and Harris, are all low IQ or mentally unstable. They do not come close to intellect that Obama, Romney, McCain or Clinton have.

You clearly do not know folks who are genuinely low IQ though I will give you - as do many, many mental health professionals - that Trump is mentally unstable.

Bushes went to Yale and the son certainly didn't distinguish himself in the intellectual realm. What was the phrase used to describe him - ignorant by indifference and inclination.

Finally, Biden, Harris, and Walz all appear to have high emotional EQ and, to go with your reasoning, it clearly complements whatever "deficits" they may have in intellect.

I guess there's a finally finally: there are a lot of folks at their state universities. Some attend their flagships, others live at home and attend their regional university. Every year Ivy grads show up at Big Ten law schools, especially Michigan, and assume they are superior to all the other students. The honest ones admit, after the first exam, that the classmates who are public school uni grads are their peers, if not their superiors, in the classroom. Many attend Big Ten schools, etc as that is what their families can afford. As Frank Bruni says, "where you go is not who you'll be."

George Bush also has high EQ.

[Anonymous]

Tim Walz will use JD's Ivy League and Silicon Valley pedigree against him tonight. Just watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Walz will definitely not be as good as Harris was.

Vance seems very gleeful and excited to debate Walz. So I assume he is feeling very confident.

Walz has said multiple times he's not a great debater.

I just hope that the debate shows viewers some actual authenticity of both men's characters - and not just overly negative gotcha moments.

yeah I agree with this take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz will use JD's Ivy League and Silicon Valley pedigree against him tonight. Just watch.

But it was an asset for the Obamas, Kennedys, Bushes, and Clintons, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz will use JD's Ivy League and Silicon Valley pedigree against him tonight. Just watch.

But it was an asset for the Obamas, Kennedys, Bushes, and Clintons, right?

With the exception of Obama and Bill Clinton, the rest got in on legacy and mediocrity.

[Anonymous]

People need to be fired and lose their retirement for doing this and that needs to happen swiftly and very publicly.

A Dozen VA Staffers Improperly Accessed Vance, Walz Medical Records

https://dailycaller.com/2024/09/30/bureaucrats-veterans-affairs-tim-walz-jd-vance-records/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz will use JD's Ivy League and Silicon Valley pedigree against him tonight. Just watch.

But it was an asset for the Obamas, Kennedys, Bushes, and Clintons, right?

With the exception of Obama and Bill Clinton, the rest got in on legacy and mediocrity.

But their Ivy educations are viewed as assets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People need to be fired and lose their retirement for doing this and that needs to happen swiftly and very publicly.

A Dozen VA Staffers Improperly Accessed Vance, Walz Medical Records

https://dailycaller.com/2024/09/30/bureaucrats-veterans-affairs-tim-walz-jd-vance-records/

+1 for sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People need to be fired and lose their retirement for doing this and that needs to happen swiftly and very publicly.

A Dozen VA Staffers Improperly Accessed Vance, Walz Medical Records

https://dailycaller.com/2024/09/30/bureaucrats-veterans-affairs-tim-walz-jd-vance-records/

Terminate and lose retirement.

[Anonymous]

Walz is going to say Democrats believe 'mind your damn business!"

Vance should reply with why did Democrats implement a kill switch for cars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People need to be fired and lose their retirement for doing this and that needs to happen swiftly and very publicly.

A Dozen VA Staffers Improperly Accessed Vance, Walz Medical Records

https://dailycaller.com/2024/09/30/bureaucrats-veterans-affairs-tim-walz-jd-vance-records/

Terminate and lose retirement.

When this happened with Obama, the person was given a top post(Clapper).