Neighbor has pit bull

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A large survey of vets put pitt bulls in the middle when it comes to dog bite risk, so that Dalmatian also might need a muzzle.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861953/

Thank you pp!

Jesus Christ. No one has ever said other dogs don’t bite. People are saying that pit bulls are the dogs that will kill you when they decide to bite you.

The problem which you and everyone else ignores is the fact that "pit bull mixes" have a lot of different dog breeds in them. Why is it the American pit bull terrier dna and not the German Shepherd or Husky that you blame?

Also, why do you blame the owners of the other dogs that attack but when it come to pit bulls you solely blame the dna of the dog? Is a dog that is 75 lab and 25 percent American pit bull terrier a pit bull mix or a lab mix?

Why is that no one will answer these questions? Instead you will come back with an insult on me or the dogs. But just more evasive answers.

Because in dogs, function follows form. If it looks like a pit bull, it’s going to have more pit bull behavioral attributes.

So if it doesnt look like a pit bull but is than by your logic it won't bite?

Your logic is really flawed. You should watch a dog's behavior rather than what it looks like!

Why do pit bull advocates have to lie about what people say? Is it that you can’t read for meaning or you just don’t want to?

Any dog can bite. Literally no one argues otherwise. Pit bulls don’t let go till they want to. They go for the neck and face, the way their ancestors successfully brought down bears and bulls in the pit. They shake smaller prey from side to side.

No, if it doesn’t look like a pit bull, its that it won’t bite like it is its job. That big blocky head and stocky neck are the strength to keep biting and the resistance to blows and bites that might get it to stop, while the “Glasgow smile” is another feature that allows pit bulls to keep getting oxygen while still biting.

But not all attacks have been done by pure bred American pit bull terriers so hence those "mixed" dogs do not have the character traits that you mention and yet they still bite.

[Anonymous]

The amount of pits that turn on their owners is all we should be looking at. Clearly those animals can’t be controlled. Since their bites are deadly, they shouldn’t be legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The amount of pits that turn on their owners is all we should be looking at. Clearly those animals can’t be controlled. Since their bites are deadly, they shouldn’t be legal.

Hmmm clearly you are off your rocker. Let's talk about kids. Your neighbor's kids rob a store and so therefore ALL kids are bad and if your kids haven't robbed anything that doesn't matter because all kids are bad and should be banned.

I am not responsible for another person who owns a pit bull that attacks when my dog is perfectly fine and hasn't done anything! I'm actually embarrassed at you anti-pit lack of logic

[Anonymous]

I found this interesting article about the history of 'dangerous' dogs and the reason for the banning of some in the UK

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23919628/dog-breed-bans-american-bully-xl-pit-bulls-rishi-sunak

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of pits that turn on their owners is all we should be looking at. Clearly those animals can’t be controlled. Since their bites are deadly, they shouldn’t be legal.

Hmmm clearly you are off your rocker. Let's talk about kids. Your neighbor's kids rob a store and so therefore ALL kids are bad and if your kids haven't robbed anything that doesn't matter because all kids are bad and should be banned.

I am not responsible for another person who owns a pit bull that attacks when my dog is perfectly fine and hasn't done anything! I'm actually embarrassed at you anti-pit lack of logic

Dear pit bull owners. Do you really want to be associated with this PP those intelligence level compares owning a pet with having children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The amount of pits that turn on their owners is all we should be looking at. Clearly those animals can’t be controlled. Since their bites are deadly, they shouldn’t be legal.

^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of pits that turn on their owners is all we should be looking at. Clearly those animals can’t be controlled. Since their bites are deadly, they shouldn’t be legal.

Hmmm clearly you are off your rocker. Let's talk about kids. Your neighbor's kids rob a store and so therefore ALL kids are bad and if your kids haven't robbed anything that doesn't matter because all kids are bad and should be banned.

I am not responsible for another person who owns a pit bull that attacks when my dog is perfectly fine and hasn't done anything! I'm actually embarrassed at you anti-pit lack of logic

Dear pit bull owners. Do you really want to be associated with this PP those intelligence level compares owning a pet with having children.

So when you have no argument it is common for people like pp to verbally attack those who they disagree with but can't actually form a counter argument.

So who is really the dumb one...hmmm?

[Anonymous]

Don't be a NIMBY

[Anonymous]

Op, has it hurt anyone yet