Which would be very relevant to a thread about FAANG share price but not terribly relevant to a thread about if recent past tech salaries will predict future entry level tech salaries. |
“All” engineers? I am quite sure you’re wrong about that. I’d rather be a liberal arts major on track to be an MD at a major Wall Street bank (like my BIL now making 7 figures) than a CS major working on AI at a tech company. |
| I wouldn't hang my hat on the hope that the market for CS will be better in 4-5 years. The fact that it's so hard to get into schools right now for CS is because there are too many seeking to get into the field. That same thing is going to happen when those students graduate and all try to get hired by the same places. |
I just hope they have a functional planet and economy. |
Yup totally agree with this. Bankers are rainmakers even at middle market and boutique banks, MDs can make several million a year. With some notable exceptions, no engineer will do that on current income. On options and RSUs, perhaps - but then that’s the lottery ticket aspect. Pick the right momentum stage startup and it becomes a winner. I know plenty for him it happened but many more for whom it didn’t Prob for bankers - burnout is high. Your 20s are lost to making pitch books on overnight and weekend wild goose chases. And so those who make it through that, many become insufferable in their 40s |
Exactly - yes let’s index to capex $$ that colleges allocated 5 years ago. The lost lagging indicator even is buildings on campus. Second most lagging is jobs HBS grads take immediately after MBA. Was consulting and banking. Now mostly tech. |
I agree with this. But that’s probably not the bulk of the CS grads. Also many 22 year olds who start at one salary level and progress in tech roles will get accustomed to that and be in for a surprised when we are oversupplied with engineers and CS majors. Less graduating debt helps but deep into 20s and 30s when people start to settle down, downward salary trajectory usually is associated with family and life instability. Let’s hope not but it’s a major factor to watch. Having kids who have dual degrees or are cross functionally trained is going to be far more important. |
IB is a miserable life. You sell your soul for $. With tech, not as much. |
+100000 Lots of tech jobs are 9-5 with WFH |
+1 I posted up thread.. my very smart DC wants work/life balance. DC sees our lives (we are in tech) - pays well, very flexible, lower stress, never travel for work. We are always there for the kids. DC told us recently that they hope to be able to have this kind of life when they have a family. We could've gone up in the corporate world and make way more, but neither my spouse nor I are interested in that. We life our flexible, work/life balance. Some people live to work, while others work to live. Tech isn't going anywhere. It will just morph. |
+1 but ITA that having $100K+ debt for a CS degree is not worth it, which is why DC is going in state flagship with merit. |
|
Comments like this show a lack of understanding of investment banks.
1. For every liberal arts humanities banker (call it history or english) there are at least 5 bankers with a STEM, finance/business or "hard" liberal arts background (economics, math, etc.). If a CS major wants to pursue investment banking, they are welcomed with open arms 2. A CS major is also heavily recruited as a trader, a quant supporting traders, a quant working within an IBank hedge fund (or of course directly for a hedge fund), someone working in the IT department of say GS where they are paying some crazy salaries to develop their own systems and consumer products, etc. So, while a liberal arts major has some limited opportunities in an investment bank...a CS major opting for this route has many 3. Even at an investment bank in trading or IT roles, the CS major is usually doing work in their field of study...while the liberal arts major is nothing to do with their field of study. I mean, a junior banker doesn't have to write in complete sentences, nor use Math above Algebra I (that even may be generous). Honestly, most billion $$ deals are done with PPT presentations and bullet points 4. Like BigLaw, many senior bankers and lawyers discourage their own kids from this path...these are careers where life isn't bad when you reach the top, but it is soul-sucking and painful to get there. At the very least, they make sure their kids go into them with eyes open I guess you also have ignored the headlines coming out of Wall Street...GS and others have started significant layoffs due to rising interest rates which has significantly reduced deal flow. You realize Tech is a significant driver of finance too, right? No IPOs or M&A or VC funding...no banker fees. |
| My understanding of the tech contraction is that while tech companies are laying off people, these employees are getting absorbed by other companies because these skills are becoming mainstream across all companies. |
That was 10 years ago. Much better chance of being selected as an analyst/associate if CS/engineering major in the first place compared to History/English majors even in IBD. You will see many STEM majors in IBD and almost all STEM majors in the Securities Division. |
But not at the eye-popping salaries reflected in recent historical data. |