The person driving probably is as upset about it as one can be. But at the end of the day they were not responsible for this guys stupid and deadly mistake. |
No doubt that is a great comfort to them.
|
The stupid and deadly mistake in your eyes was riding a bike. |
Not PP but the stupid and deadly mistake in my eyes was running a stop sign. |
I prefer road designs where when I'm driving, I'm less at risk of killing people who do stupid things. |
There was nothing the driver could do. Gaylin pulled out in front of him. He wasn’t going that fast, and all indications were that Gaylin would survive when the ambulance took him to the hospital. I used to see Gaylin around on his bike and he never stopped. Luckily for him, all but one driver was able to stop and prevent a deadly collision. Unfortunately for him, one couldn’t. Redesigning the road was an overreaction. His death wasn’t a punishment. No one had any intent to punish. It was the outcome of his own recklessness. |
That is a lot of words to obscure these facts: 1. Ned Gaylin was killed 2. Someone who was driving killed him with their car 3. The design was dangerous (and was known to be dangerous) |
If pedestrians and cyclists don't stop before crossing a street, every single road design is dangerous. |
Speed bumps. Bike lanes. Taking away lanes for other reasons like creating a park on a road, actually next to a park. All part of the Mont. Cty road diet strategy. Build more everywhere, pack them all in, and then let them eat cake in traffic and wreck their alignments (and bad backs!) on bumps. |
4. Ned Gaylin’s own reckless conduct caused the collision and his death. If he did the same thing today he’d still die. Vision Zero is a folly unless people take responsibility for their own safety and follow the rules. People can make any design deadly. Ned Gaylin is proof of that. |
No, that's incorrect. The difference is speed. If you're going going 20 mph or less, it's very likely that the people will survive without major injury. The faster you're going, the more likely that the people will have a major injury or be killed. By the time you get to 40 mph, the chance of their major injury or death is over 80%. Also, the faster you're going, the less able you are to see and stop for people. Faster speeds produce more tunnel vision, and also the stopping distance is longer. |
More speed humps, bike lanes, and parks sounds good to me. I'd like more sidewalks too, please, and more kids able to walk and bike safely to school. |
I don't think you understand Vision Zero. Vision Zero says that roads should be safe for everyone EVEN WHEN people DON'T follow the rules. |
You are correct. There were plans to rip up the road, and then when no one was looking, they repaved and restriped it with a bike lane. Missed all the hearings and demand study on that. Drove it today. Zero bikers out. Again. |
| Np. I live in a kids school walk zone. We can’t afford to hire more buses frankly, and it’s better for kids to walk. Cars going ten miles faster only save 3-6 min on their trip. You really think 3-6 min is worth losing out in having pedestrians, bicyclists, and kids being able to walk to school safely. Your ‘need for speed’ is not in anyones interest. It means more cars on the road, more traffic jams, more obesity. You are only screwing yourself in the end by not encouraging sharing the roads and traveling at safe speeds. If everyone has to drive, you will be stuck behind them. |