U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/042522zor_k536.pdf

Nothing from SCOTUS today. Starting to open up the possibility that the Class of 2025 could be seated prior to Roberts ruling on the stay order, which would render the motion irrelevant and would leave the matter to the Fourth Circuit as concerns the Class of 2027.

Wholly reasonable that decisions could be released this Friday.

Really? Oh. I was hoping for an order, or something. To put this thread to rest, at least. So we could start a new one that would hopefully go better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/042522zor_k536.pdf

Nothing from SCOTUS today. Starting to open up the possibility that the Class of 2025 could be seated prior to Roberts ruling on the stay order, which would render the motion irrelevant and would leave the matter to the Fourth Circuit as concerns the Class of 2027.

Wholly reasonable that decisions could be released this Friday.

It’s not unheard of for the Supreme Court to allow deadlines to expire on orders like this that they simply don’t want to deal with. With the far more salient cases of Harvard and UNC on the docket for October, the relatively minimal impact of the process (complainant YM has gotten kids into the school both under the old AND new process, for example), and the weakness of the facts at hand, Roberts may decide that this isn’t the right case to use to attack affirmative action.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/042522zor_k536.pdf

Nothing from SCOTUS today. Starting to open up the possibility that the Class of 2025 could be seated prior to Roberts ruling on the stay order, which would render the motion irrelevant and would leave the matter to the Fourth Circuit as concerns the Class of 2027.

Wholly reasonable that decisions could be released this Friday.

It’s not unheard of for the Supreme Court to allow deadlines to expire on orders like this that they simply don’t want to deal with. With the far more salient cases of Harvard and UNC on the docket for October, the relatively minimal impact of the process (complainant YM has gotten kids into the school both under the old AND new process, for example), and the weakness of the facts at hand, Roberts may decide that this isn’t the right case to use to attack affirmative action.

Genuinely wonder what the Coalition will do if the class gets seated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/042522zor_k536.pdf

Nothing from SCOTUS today. Starting to open up the possibility that the Class of 2025 could be seated prior to Roberts ruling on the stay order, which would render the motion irrelevant and would leave the matter to the Fourth Circuit as concerns the Class of 2027.

Wholly reasonable that decisions could be released this Friday.

It’s not unheard of for the Supreme Court to allow deadlines to expire on orders like this that they simply don’t want to deal with. With the far more salient cases of Harvard and UNC on the docket for October, the relatively minimal impact of the process (complainant YM has gotten kids into the school both under the old AND new process, for example), and the weakness of the facts at hand, Roberts may decide that this isn’t the right case to use to attack affirmative action.

Genuinely wonder what the Coalition will do if the class gets seated.

They can go choke on their tears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/042522zor_k536.pdf

Nothing from SCOTUS today. Starting to open up the possibility that the Class of 2025 could be seated prior to Roberts ruling on the stay order, which would render the motion irrelevant and would leave the matter to the Fourth Circuit as concerns the Class of 2027.

Wholly reasonable that decisions could be released this Friday.

It’s not unheard of for the Supreme Court to allow deadlines to expire on orders like this that they simply don’t want to deal with. With the far more salient cases of Harvard and UNC on the docket for October, the relatively minimal impact of the process (complainant YM has gotten kids into the school both under the old AND new process, for example), and the weakness of the facts at hand, Roberts may decide that this isn’t the right case to use to attack affirmative action.

Genuinely wonder what the Coalition will do if the class gets seated.

They can go choke on their tears.

+1

[Anonymous]

The folks I know in the Coalition are really upset that no statement was made today. They were ready to celebrate and now they are seriously worried that the game may be over on Friday. They know that they don't have another option if offers go out with respect to the class of 2026.

[Anonymous]

Yea, it would be sad if racists get to push through one last round of racist admissions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yea, it would be sad if racists get to push through one last round of racist admissions.

Why hello, C4TJ, there you are! Go ruin someone else's lives. No one wants you here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yea, it would be sad if racists get to push through one last round of racist admissions.

Lol, have you seen Asra's rants? Pot calling the kettle black.

[Anonymous]

For those interested, the application was denied by SCOTUS.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/21A590.html

Sad day. I guess we'll see how the Harvard case turns out before this one makes its way to the supreme court.

[Anonymous]

Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those interested, the application was denied by SCOTUS.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/21A590.html

Sad day. I guess we'll see how the Harvard case turns out before this one makes its way to the supreme court.

Harvard’s policy will be upheld 5-4 or 6-3. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Yea, racists rejoice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested, the application was denied by SCOTUS.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/21A590.html

Sad day. I guess we'll see how the Harvard case turns out before this one makes its way to the supreme court.

Harvard’s policy will be upheld 5-4 or 6-3. Sorry.

I guess in the end, anything is possible. I'm just sad that in this day and age, people still think that practicing racist discrimination by a government entity or publicly funded entity is a good idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Yea, racists rejoice.

Huh?