Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This guy thinks journalists are speaking truths. They are not.

I’m paying the $8 because I’m a sucker.

Fixed that for you.

Always knew leftists were elites

Girl, you need to look up the definition of elite.

Rejecting a new cost for something is not it. You can’t complain about inflation and then suggest that rejecting an extra monthly charge is elitist. Unless you live in bizarro world.

They aren’t rejecting the cost. If you read their tweets, they are rejecting the loss of status

hese are “their” tweets I’m reading. You’re not to elitist to care are you?

It’s not $20

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Silverman changed her profile to Elon too and got banned 😂

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkoWCmBvBSI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

So did Kathy Griffin and another journalist for impersonating Andy Ngo

Serves these idiots right. I’m so here for this.

So free speech is bad now? I can’t keep up with you people.

You wanted him to moderate speech and he accommodated you. Smile!

They spoofed him to point out how ignorant he was about verification. He had to be shown that paying $7.99 for a blue check was not a substitute for the necessity of verifying that the person isn’t an imposter. He was so desperate for those $7.99 payments he was blind to the purpose and need for verification. Everybody told him but he was too stupid to listen, so they had to show him.

Then why are these people so hung up about their blue checks?

JFC. It’s not a status symbol. It’s verification. It means the identity of the person has been verified. It’s important to them because journalists and public figures are plagued by trolls and bots. Musk was planning to eliminate verification and sell blue checks. He’s a moron and didn’t understand why verification matters so they showed him as a joke. He can’t take a joke because he is crybaby.

They also become trolls apparently.

Elon bought Twitter to enable trolls. That’s his main purpose. He is a troll. He bought to so he and his fanboys can post disinformation.

Disinformation like a laptop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Silverman changed her profile to Elon too and got banned 😂

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkoWCmBvBSI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

So did Kathy Griffin and another journalist for impersonating Andy Ngo

Serves these idiots right. I’m so here for this.

So free speech is bad now? I can’t keep up with you people.

You wanted him to moderate speech and he accommodated you. Smile!

They spoofed him to point out how ignorant he was about verification. He had to be shown that paying $7.99 for a blue check was not a substitute for the necessity of verifying that the person isn’t an imposter. He was so desperate for those $7.99 payments he was blind to the purpose and need for verification. Everybody told him but he was too stupid to listen, so they had to show him.

Then why are these people so hung up about their blue checks?

JFC. It’s not a status symbol. It’s verification. It means the identity of the person has been verified. It’s important to them because journalists and public figures are plagued by trolls and bots. Musk was planning to eliminate verification and sell blue checks. He’s a moron and didn’t understand why verification matters so they showed him as a joke. He can’t take a joke because he is crybaby.

They also become trolls apparently.

Elon bought Twitter to enable trolls. That’s his main purpose. He is a troll. He bought to so he and his fanboys can post disinformation.

Disinformation like pretending you are someone else, then promoting politicians and posting nasty things? That kind of disinformation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This guy thinks journalists are speaking truths. They are not.

I’m paying the $8 because I’m a sucker.

Fixed that for you.

Always knew leftists were elites

Girl, you need to look up the definition of elite.

Rejecting a new cost for something is not it. You can’t complain about inflation and then suggest that rejecting an extra monthly charge is elitist. Unless you live in bizarro world.

They aren’t rejecting the cost. If you read their tweets, they are rejecting the loss of status

hese are “their” tweets I’m reading. You’re not to elitist to care are you?

Since you can impersonate anyone on Twitter despite a blue checkmark, I don't see how blue checkmarks help anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This guy thinks journalists are speaking truths. They are not.

I’m paying the $8 because I’m a sucker.

Fixed that for you.

Always knew leftists were elites

Girl, you need to look up the definition of elite.

Rejecting a new cost for something is not it. You can’t complain about inflation and then suggest that rejecting an extra monthly charge is elitist. Unless you live in bizarro world.

They aren’t rejecting the cost. If you read their tweets, they are rejecting the loss of status

hese are “their” tweets I’m reading. You’re not to elitist to care are you?

Since you can impersonate anyone on Twitter despite a blue checkmark, I don't see how blue checkmarks help anyone.

If you change your account name to a famous person’s but you don’t have the blue check verifying you’re that famous person, you’re not the famous person’s account. Get it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This guy thinks journalists are speaking truths. They are not.

I’m paying the $8 because I’m a sucker.

Fixed that for you.

Always knew leftists were elites

Girl, you need to look up the definition of elite.

Rejecting a new cost for something is not it. You can’t complain about inflation and then suggest that rejecting an extra monthly charge is elitist. Unless you live in bizarro world.

They aren’t rejecting the cost. If you read their tweets, they are rejecting the loss of status

hese are “their” tweets I’m reading. You’re not to elitist to care are you?

It’s not $20

FFS. Elon arbitrarily changed the $20 to $8. But it's $8/month, and that adds up to $20 real quick. $8 USD /month is out of reach for a huge population of the world. Requiring $8USD/m is elitist AF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Silverman changed her profile to Elon too and got banned 😂

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkoWCmBvBSI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

So did Kathy Griffin and another journalist for impersonating Andy Ngo

Serves these idiots right. I’m so here for this.

So free speech is bad now? I can’t keep up with you people.

You wanted him to moderate speech and he accommodated you. Smile!

[Anonymous]

Hysterical.. Musk is like Trump when it comes to leadership. Chaotic and clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s kinda entertaining to see someone so revered for being a “genius” to be exposed as a hack. Musk is not a business genius, maybe good at marketing. And for those who don’t know, he doesn’t have an engineering degree.

The emperor has no clothes.

He is a business genius, but what that means is that he has hits and misses. Big hits and big misses.

Tesla was propped up by billions in subsidies. Without those subsidies, I don't think his business would've been successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Silverman changed her profile to Elon too and got banned 😂

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkoWCmBvBSI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

So did Kathy Griffin and another journalist for impersonating Andy Ngo

Serves these idiots right. I’m so here for this.

So free speech is bad now? I can’t keep up with you people.

You wanted him to moderate speech and he accommodated you. Smile!

They spoofed him to point out how ignorant he was about verification. He had to be shown that paying $7.99 for a blue check was not a substitute for the necessity of verifying that the person isn’t an imposter. He was so desperate for those $7.99 payments he was blind to the purpose and need for verification. Everybody told him but he was too stupid to listen, so they had to show him.

Then why are these people so hung up about their blue checks?

JFC. It’s not a status symbol. It’s verification. It means the identity of the person has been verified. It’s important to them because journalists and public figures are plagued by trolls and bots. Musk was planning to eliminate verification and sell blue checks. He’s a moron and didn’t understand why verification matters so they showed him as a joke. He can’t take a joke because he is crybaby.

They also become trolls apparently.

Elon bought Twitter to enable trolls. That’s his main purpose. He is a troll. He bought to so he and his fanboys can post disinformation.

Disinformation like pretending you are someone else, then promoting politicians and posting nasty things? That kind of disinformation?

It's not just "disinformation," it is literally slander / libel that could ruin someone's life. It's not a joke, it's not funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s kinda entertaining to see someone so revered for being a “genius” to be exposed as a hack. Musk is not a business genius, maybe good at marketing. And for those who don’t know, he doesn’t have an engineering degree.

The emperor has no clothes.

He is a business genius, but what that means is that he has hits and misses. Big hits and big misses.

Tesla was propped up by billions in subsidies. Without those subsidies, I don't think his business would've been successful.

So like, the same as... General Motors, NASA, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, on and on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s kinda entertaining to see someone so revered for being a “genius” to be exposed as a hack. Musk is not a business genius, maybe good at marketing. And for those who don’t know, he doesn’t have an engineering degree.

The emperor has no clothes.

He is a business genius, but what that means is that he has hits and misses. Big hits and big misses.

Tesla was propped up by billions in subsidies. Without those subsidies, I don't think his business would've been successful.

So like, the same as... General Motors, NASA, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, on and on?

DP. Exactly. Which is why it is so irritating when the CEOs of all these entities (and others) are such arrogant fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s kinda entertaining to see someone so revered for being a “genius” to be exposed as a hack. Musk is not a business genius, maybe good at marketing. And for those who don’t know, he doesn’t have an engineering degree.

The emperor has no clothes.

He is a business genius, but what that means is that he has hits and misses. Big hits and big misses.

Tesla was propped up by billions in subsidies. Without those subsidies, I don't think his business would've been successful.

So like, the same as... General Motors, NASA, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, on and on?

You think NASA is a business?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It’s kinda entertaining to see someone so revered for being a “genius” to be exposed as a hack. Musk is not a business genius, maybe good at marketing. And for those who don’t know, he doesn’t have an engineering degree.

The emperor has no clothes.

He is a business genius, but what that means is that he has hits and misses. Big hits and big misses.

Tesla was propped up by billions in subsidies. Without those subsidies, I don't think his business would've been successful.

So like, the same as... General Motors, NASA, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, on and on?

You think NASA is a business?

lol, yes. A massive grift.

[Anonymous]