It was on a summer reading list, so it was not unauthorized. |
It was unauthorized. A Texas middle school teacher has been fired after assigning an unapproved illustrated version of Anne Frank's Diary to her eighth grade reading class. While district officials claim the adaptation of Anne Frank's Diary was not approved, it was included on a reading list sent to parents at the start of the school year, KFDM reports. https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/texas-teacher-anne-frank-fired-18375331.php The controversy surrounding this incident is compounded by the fact that the illustrated and unabridged version of "Anne Frank's Diary" was included on a reading list distributed to parents at the beginning of the school year, even though it was never officially approved by district officials. This revelation has prompted the school district to launch an investigation into the oversight. https://www.outlookindia.com/international/us/texas-middle-school-teacher-fired-after-assigning-graphic-novel-adaptation-of-anne-frank-news-319306 So, how does a book appear on a reading list you might ask? Either a committee of teachers or some "curriculum specialist" added the book without the knowledge of administration. I know. I used to work in this field. Hopefully, the investigation will find how that happened. |
I assume they are? Not getting your point here. |
More concerned that the book has been banned. That’s the concern. |
No problem. Purchase it for your kid if that's your thing. You can still get it. Just not in the Charlotte-Mecklinburg classrooms. So, it's not really banned at all. |
I haven't read it but the reviews on Amazon seem to make it clear why the book was not approved. It is abridged, like most graphic novels are, and also includes new material that Anne's father had censored in the originally published diary, mostly pertaining to her sexual fantasies about girls, boys, and statues. Those were apparently a part of her diary that her father removed - they may be an appropriate part of a modern coming of age book but could easily be left out of the story as it has generally been told. |
That's your interpretation of it. Could also mean simply be yourself no matter how you are labeled. What is wrong with that? Do you also want to ban Dr. Seuss's Sneetches? Same idea. |
the greatest triumph the left has achieved in this debate is convincing people to use the word "ban"
schools and libraries do not ban, they CHOOSE - what to include and what not to GOVERNMENTS ban |
As opposed to your side trying to normalize hate and intolerance of difference. The good news is that most of the public doesn't approve of your nonsense. |
If you’d get arrested for showing the material to your subordinates at the office, it’s wrong to show children at public schools. How easy is that? |
Public schools and public libraries are part of the government. Did you miss that lesson in school? The right has always loved banning books and knowledge and information that it perceives as a threat to its extremism. Can't have the free circulation of ideas! |
Sadly that will continue to use the word "ban". They know they are being dishonest when they do it but they don't care. There are zero cases in this country of books being banned. Anywhere. |
I'd get arrested for showing a copy of the book about a crayon to subordinates in the office? |
Cool. So teachers everywhere are allowed to bring in the book about a crayon or the graphic version of Anne Frank's diary into their classroom? School libraries in every state can stock Toni Morrison's Beloved and Ta-Nahesi Coates' Between the World and Me? Great news! |
+1 We gave it to our eight year old to read. He was fine with it. |