Metro United

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

U15 Metro United tied ECNL Richmond United 5-5
MU played within only 12 players but 2 were hurt
the last 15 min so they only played with 10! They still
Played beautifully ???? thanks for asking

why 3 question marks? that is very confusing.

Did Richmond move to 10 or did they continue with full numbers?

Full and they had more subs . MU had 2 and got hurt the last 15 so MU played a man down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did they U14 and U16s do?

Scroll up

I did. There is nothing posted on the U14 and U16.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did they U14 and U16s do?

Scroll up

I did. There is nothing posted on the U14 and U16.

I’m not sure U14 played but I know U16 did

[Anonymous]

Good job today Metro United

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good job today Metro United

Definitely a nice little opener to kick off the year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

Wrong. These players are permanent. Don’t think there’s a admin dad. If there was do t think his kid plays up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

Wrong. These players are permanent. Don’t think there’s a admin dad. If there was do t think his kid plays up

Wrong. These players are not. Games will start soon, and we will see. Last year there was one whose dad this year is involved in the administration. He even helped coin the name "Metro United" . Again, I know of several examples of players who were playing up and aren't now. I'm posting from first-hand knowledge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

I think there’s a 1-2 onU16 playing up.

[Anonymous]

Arlington is also keeping small rosters. They don't engage in playing up either. That makes 2 area DAs who I would say are running it right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

I think there’s a 1-2 onU16 playing up.

Could be. Like I said, there was one from last year. However, the difference is last year it was wild. Every team had some, and it was a disaster. No one is saying it should never ever happen. Only a fool would think it should chronically happen.

To be frank, almost every player I have ever seen play up for an extended period of time has come back down or finished out less of a player.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good job today Metro United

For what? I'm still not understanding. The only results posted were the U15s.

U14, U16, U17, U18 scores?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

Wrong. These players are permanent. Don’t think there’s a admin dad. If there was do t think his kid plays up

Wrong. These players are not. Games will start soon, and we will see. Last year there was one whose dad this year is involved in the administration. He even helped coin the name "Metro United" . Again, I know of several examples of players who were playing up and aren't now. I'm posting from first-hand knowledge.

MU parent here-
U16 - 1 playing up
U15-1 playing up 2 yrs
U14- 2 playing up

You’re an idiot - must be an FCV parent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

Wrong. These players are permanent. Don’t think there’s a admin dad. If there was do t think his kid plays up

Wrong. These players are not. Games will start soon, and we will see. Last year there was one whose dad this year is involved in the administration. He even helped coin the name "Metro United" . Again, I know of several examples of players who were playing up and aren't now. I'm posting from first-hand knowledge.

MU parent here-
U16 - 1 playing up
U15-1 playing up 2 yrs
U14- 2 playing up

You’re an idiot - must be an FCV parent

Soubds like the same amount of playups as last year except for the U17 playup that left the club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

They may have kept the one whose dad is one of the admins, but others were dropped back. I know of several examples. Today there was some playing up due to player shortages on some rosters, but that isn't the same as moving those players up permanently. The coaches themselves from last year say openly it was done too frequently and improperly.

Wrong. These players are permanent. Don’t think there’s a admin dad. If there was do t think his kid plays up

Wrong. These players are not. Games will start soon, and we will see. Last year there was one whose dad this year is involved in the administration. He even helped coin the name "Metro United" . Again, I know of several examples of players who were playing up and aren't now. I'm posting from first-hand knowledge.

MU parent here-
U16 - 1 playing up
U15-1 playing up 2 yrs
U14- 2 playing up

You’re an idiot - must be an FCV parent

I won't stoop to your level. I said I know of examples, and I do. One left MU because she wouldn't be offered a play up spot and is now gone. Two are back down in their own age group. One goalie who chronically played up last year is playing at age at Arlington.

As for the little 07, maybe she's good enough. Like I said, no one said never.