Metro United

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

You mean an upward turning point. Right?

How’d it go in Richmond?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

You mean an upward turning point. Right?

How’d it go in Richmond?

Reminds me of Morris Day in Purple Rain asking Prince, How’s the family?” I suspect you know.

[Anonymous]

NP. I thought Metro looked good today. Far fewer subs than Richmond and that was a factor in the heat. Metro had smaller rosters and played well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

You mean an upward turning point. Right?

How’d it go in Richmond?

Reminds me of Morris Day in Purple Rain asking Prince, How’s the family?” I suspect you know.

I don’t. That’s why I asked. Not everyone is against you. Relax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

You mean an upward turning point. Right?

How’d it go in Richmond?

U15 Metro United tied ECNL Richmond United 5-5
MU played within only 12 players but 2 were hurt
the last 15 min so they only played with 10! They still
Played beautifully ???? thanks for asking

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. I thought Metro looked good today. Far fewer subs than Richmond and that was a factor in the heat. Metro had smaller rosters and played well.

I'd say that's fair. All in all the team's looked good for several age groups. With a lack of subs, some teams fell behind toward the end. Richmond from what I saw had a pretty big bench and sub'd regularly. No question that helped them weather the heat better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

U15 Metro United tied ECNL Richmond United 5-5
MU played within only 12 players but 2 were hurt
the last 15 min so they only played with 10! They still
Played beautifully ???? thanks for asking

why 3 question marks? that is very confusing.

Did Richmond move to 10 or did they continue with full numbers?

[Anonymous]

What were the other results?

And can you save the excuses. Just give the scores.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What were the other results?

And can you save the excuses. Just give the scores.

You can save the drama and demands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Believe whatever you like. I can't blame you given two years of mind boggling decisions that no other club in the country would have done and then justifying it with ludicrous explanations. Given all that Spirit did, it was hard for me to believe until I saw them cutting players, giving players PT offers, and losing players because they would no longer be played up. And the training environment has stepped up considerably, with coaches demanding intensity when they weren't empowered to before.

This year will be a turning point.

BTW - they kept the gals that play up. A few playing on U14 and
I believe a player on U15 playing up 2 yrs. They have much better coaching
which I think it plays a huge impact plus they are training 4-5 times a
week now not 3-5 like last 2 seasons. I’m sure there will be much improvement
as the seasons continue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What were the other results?

And can you save the excuses. Just give the scores.

There weren’t full teams for U17 MU - vacay

[Anonymous]

How did they U14 and U16s do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did they U14 and U16s do?

Scrillip

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did they U14 and U16s do?

Scroll up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

U15 Metro United tied ECNL Richmond United 5-5
MU played within only 12 players but 2 were hurt
the last 15 min so they only played with 10! They still
Played beautifully ???? thanks for asking

why 3 question marks? that is very confusing.

Did Richmond move to 10 or did they continue with full numbers?

Full and they had more subs . MU had 2 and bit hurt hurt the last 15 so MU played a man down