She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

if she had chosen Shapiro, she would have been criticized for being a corporate democrat.

Lose Lose.

Honestly, this doesn't feel like losing. Anything can happen and it's going to be a close race no matter what. But I think this was a really smart pick and I just adore this guy - the more I learn about him the more I like him.

[Anonymous]

Tim Walz took some damage In his 20 years as an artilleryman. Multiple ear surgeries. To be fair, JD Vance took some damage as well in his four years as a correspondent. Multiple paper cuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic nominee is married to a Jewish man, the Democratic Senate Majority leader is a Jewish man, and the Republican nominee is making a point of hanging out with Nick Fuentes and Kanye West; but, sure, the Democrats are antisemitic.

The democrats who were making a huge stink about Shapiro and Israel ARE anti semitic. He is just as moderate as every other candidate but he was singled out because he’s Jewish. That is the textbook definition of anti semitism.

And Kamala’s husband being Jewish doesn’t count for anything and you know it. All it means is that Kamala is not an anti semite.

OMG enough with the whining! Start your own Sour Grapes thread if you're so upset Shapiro didn't make the cut!

You had to know Kamala would never pick a Jew.

If you wanted to pick a Jew, you should’ve picked Bernie Sanders. That’s your fault. The progressives were all here for a Jewish president back in 2016, and the party was ready but ironically thanks to Jews it didn’t happen.

He was ahead of his time for his party but at least even Bernie was an independent who wasn’t crazy about taking guns away or importing illegal immigrants to take jobs and tax payer resources from Americans so he was more right leaning in some respects.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic nominee is married to a Jewish man, the Democratic Senate Majority leader is a Jewish man, and the Republican nominee is making a point of hanging out with Nick Fuentes and Kanye West; but, sure, the Democrats are antisemitic.

The democrats who were making a huge stink about Shapiro and Israel ARE anti semitic. He is just as moderate as every other candidate but he was singled out because he’s Jewish. That is the textbook definition of anti semitism.

And Kamala’s husband being Jewish doesn’t count for anything and you know it. All it means is that Kamala is not an anti semite.

OMG enough with the whining! Start your own Sour Grapes thread if you're so upset Shapiro didn't make the cut!

You had to know Kamala would never pick a Jew.

No I didn't. I did know Shapiro was problematic for a variety of reasons, not just his hard line about Gaza, but also his positions on vouchers, fracking, etc. that put him out of step with the mainstream of the Democratic Party, as well as the sexual harassment allegations against one of his staff and his office's handling of Ellen Greenberg's death when he was AG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now what?

backed up by AIPAC
totally left leaning folks will not like this . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biggest question: Does Tim Walz move the needle for independents/moderates?

yes, he does. In a good way.

Absolutely not. This is a truly progressive ticket. I probably would have voted for Harris had she chosen Shapiro.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We found the editor, and only reader, of Teen Vogue right here on DCUM.

Teen Vogue has had solid political reporting for years, and its audience has been primarily but not exclusively young female voters. Dismiss it if you like, but decrying it publicly makes it clear how out of touch you are.

Vance, I told you to scram. #mascara

Your schtick is that you think JD Vance would read and defend Teen Vogue? And that as a Dem voter, you are making fun of men who wear makeup during television appearances (which is, hint, all of them)?

You’re as weird as they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic nominee is married to a Jewish man, the Democratic Senate Majority leader is a Jewish man, and the Republican nominee is making a point of hanging out with Nick Fuentes and Kanye West; but, sure, the Democrats are antisemitic.

The democrats who were making a huge stink about Shapiro and Israel ARE anti semitic. He is just as moderate as every other candidate but he was singled out because he’s Jewish. That is the textbook definition of anti semitism.

And Kamala’s husband being Jewish doesn’t count for anything and you know it. All it means is that Kamala is not an anti semite.

Now do Islamaphobes. Are we as concerned about their presence among voters for either party?

Not trying to "whatabout" you here. But I'm trying to figure out why the anti-[Name Your Religion] sentiment is more important with respect to Shapiro than in any other context.

Presumably Muslims *are* concerned about Islamaphobes and don’t vote for Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biggest question: Does Tim Walz move the needle for independents/moderates?

yes, he does. In a good way.

Absolutely not. This is a truly progressive ticket. I probably would have voted for Harris had she chosen Shapiro.
DP

Sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Walz did suffer health consequences from all those howitzer cannon booms. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs records supplied by Walz after MPR News inquired about the scope and timing of the damage show he filed a claim for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus with the agency in 2013.

In a benefits application, Walz spoke of blasts that "would knock us down and after firing I had ringing in my ears" and hearing loss that progressively worsened during his 21 years in the field artillery unit.

What are you talking about? He never saw combat!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I live in SEC country (getting the Georgia TV commercials from both campaigns).

Walz is seen as open border, sanctuary city far left radical.

there was not going to be any democrat who wouldn't read that way, if this is your take

[Anonymous]

The way this race is shaping up, one ticket is about hope, joy, and the future; and the other is about grievance, anger, and the past. Walz reinforces Harris's message better than the other options.

My personal favorite was Buttigieg. (I suppose we'll see trolls saying that not choosing him was a sign of homophobia.) But at the end of the day, Walz does a great job of reinforcing the themes Harris will need to sell in order to get elected; and he seems to be a well-liked Governor, winning by 8% during the "red wave" year of 2022.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

He is charming. Trump sucks all the charm out of the universe.

+1 that is exactly right. he's the guy who you hope you get to talk to at the party. trump is the guy you avoid with all your might.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So them Trump fans should agree with him.

Mayor Bowser requested National Guard support on January 6, 2021. Trump ignored her. So, in that respect, they are clearly of the same mold. They did not think that the situations they were faced with required the national guard to address.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Very interesting. I can’t wait to hear what the ahole who couldn’t stop criticizing Vance’s military service has to say about this. If I recall, that troll insisted that Vance only served as a resume builder and never saw combat. Looks like that describes Walz exactly. So we’re applying those same “standards” to Walz, right?

Sure. If someone says that Walz served "nobly," I'm going to want evidence that he did something noble. Merely doing your time in the military doesn't rise to that level. No shame - often enough, your period or mode of service doesn't give you much of an opportunity to do much more than your job. But people shouldn't oversell military service as more than what it is.

Then you agree with Walz himself. He has said precisely that about his own service.

Excellent!