The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Ivanka is too costume. But I like Melania’s ball dress.

It must really burn the sons to have Ivanka on the stage.

They looked like they were cosplaying film noir actresses. It was like a costume party. Hideous group

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love Melania's dress, sorry, I should stay off this forum.

She looked beautiful and the gown was custom. It was daring (for American fashion tbh, Americans are less daring, esp first ladies) and unusual for an inaugural gown. It’s hard to pull off a choker and Melania did. She trended less colonial and more continental today, and it’s disconcerting to some of the hayseeds.

Ivanka followed suit. They both looked fantastic.

Ivanka knocked it out of the park.

(Her earlier green outfit though…. Totally cosplaying Kate Middleton. I think wearing her camel coat inside was also following Kate Middleton’s penchant for coat dresses).

Ivanka looks like a human mannequin. Her proportions are all off. Her plastic surgery is a travesty. Just so unnatural looking, so bad. Ugh

I think the black gloves are a lot with the dress. Also, Audrey Hepburn was tiny, so the embroidery covered more of her dress. Ivanka's dress looks relatively plain, though I think it has exactly the same amount of embroidery. In addition, Ivanka has a slight hunch, a lot of tall women do especially if their partners are not much taller, and that really doesn't help when trying to carry a dress like this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we have a discussion about why the Trump women who are literal billionaires and grew up with access to the finest ateliers since birth are so...tacky? How can you even make a famous gown Audrey Hepburn wore tacky?

They are relatively new money. They are gaudy, lack any real substance or charisma. They are on the same level as the Kardashians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love Melania's dress, sorry, I should stay off this forum.

She looked beautiful and the gown was custom. It was daring (for American fashion tbh, Americans are less daring, esp first ladies) and unusual for an inaugural gown. It’s hard to pull off a choker and Melania did. She trended less colonial and more continental today, and it’s disconcerting to some of the hayseeds.

Ivanka followed suit. They both looked fantastic.

Ivanka knocked it out of the park.

(Her earlier green outfit though…. Totally cosplaying Kate Middleton. I think wearing her camel coat inside was also following Kate Middleton’s penchant for coat dresses).

Ivanka looks like a human mannequin. Her proportions are all off. Her plastic surgery is a travesty. Just so unnatural looking, so bad. Ugh

I think the black gloves are a lot with the dress. Also, Audrey Hepburn was tiny, so the embroidery covered more of her dress. Ivanka's dress looks relatively plain, though I think it has exactly the same amount of embroidery. In addition, Ivanka has a slight hunch, a lot of tall women do especially if their partners are not much taller, and that really doesn't help when trying to carry a dress like this.

The black gloves, the bleach blonde hair, the heavy makeup, the obvious plastic surgery and the diamond accessories cheapen the otherwise beautiful dress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Take off the flower and it even looks like her hat.

The flower would have been an improvement.
Also, one of my favorite books ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we have a discussion about why the Trump women who are literal billionaires and grew up with access to the finest ateliers since birth are so...tacky? How can you even make a famous gown Audrey Hepburn wore tacky?

Because Ivanka is not Audrey Hepburn not even close. And Kim Kardashian is not Marilyn Monroe. Money doesn’t equal class. These people are so delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love Melania's dress, sorry, I should stay off this forum.

She looked beautiful and the gown was custom. It was daring (for American fashion tbh, Americans are less daring, esp first ladies) and unusual for an inaugural gown. It’s hard to pull off a choker and Melania did. She trended less colonial and more continental today, and it’s disconcerting to some of the hayseeds.

Ivanka followed suit. They both looked fantastic.

Ivanka knocked it out of the park.

(Her earlier green outfit though…. Totally cosplaying Kate Middleton. I think wearing her camel coat inside was also following Kate Middleton’s penchant for coat dresses).

Ivanka looks like a human mannequin. Her proportions are all off. Her plastic surgery is a travesty. Just so unnatural looking, so bad. Ugh

I think the black gloves are a lot with the dress. Also, Audrey Hepburn was tiny, so the embroidery covered more of her dress. Ivanka's dress looks relatively plain, though I think it has exactly the same amount of embroidery. In addition, Ivanka has a slight hunch, a lot of tall women do especially if their partners are not much taller, and that really doesn't help when trying to carry a dress like this.

The level of embroidery per blank space on the dress bothered me too, and it's a solvable problem -- they should have made the embroidery on Ivanka's dress larger. Even if using an existing fabric, you can cut it so the embroidery comes higher on the bust and covers more of the skirt. I also just think the construction is off and makes it look like a cheap replica -- what you'd get if you sent a photo of the Audrey dress to one of those Chinese replica-makers. But like look at this other angle on the original below below -- it's not just that the embroidery covers more of the dress, it's also the construction of the overskirt and the way it seems to wrap around more and have more volume, and little details like the bow at the waistline. It looks like a very finished, complete look. Ivanka's lacks that level of finish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her hair looks like a wig to me in this pic and her plastic surgery also seems off.

https://x.com/ivankatrump/status/1881103544083788162

Her dad photobombed a perfectly nice family photo. Shame.

Ivanka’s coat and her look cheap as sht. The button and lapel are whack, along with that twee dumbassed appliqué. Her hair color is really bad, and why does it look so damn wiggy?

It’s looks wiggy because it’s a wig! Her hair is very thin and shouldn’t be worn that long at all.

She has converted to Orthodox Judaism (when she married Jared), which among other things suggests married women wear wigs when out in public. Only their husbands getting to see their natural hair.

I don’t think she wore a wig every day since their wedding.

She just has hair extensions because she is fake and gaudy, as is her entire body. She had a complete reno of her body. Very classy chick indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why people always try to read into Melania. She has done a lot of public speaking and writing and she has never said anything not banal or petulant. Even when she was secretly taped complaining, what she said was pretty boring.

Her hat looks dumb but I do not think she is trying to send any kind of message except “look at my hat.”

Yes agree. I’m annoyed with people always saying, she’s sending a message too. She isn’t that deep. She a gold digging soft core porn model. Dumb. She also has zero respect for the First Lady role. She has to go babysit her college age son.

+1000 None of the Trumps, including Ivanka, Tiffany and the boys appear to be deep philosophical rational individuals. They are vain superficial attention seekers imo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we have a discussion about why the Trump women who are literal billionaires and grew up with access to the finest ateliers since birth are so...tacky? How can you even make a famous gown Audrey Hepburn wore tacky?

They are relatively new money. They are gaudy, lack any real substance or charisma. They are on the same level as the Kardashians.

It's not an excuse. You can be new money and have impeccable taste -- socialites have used great taste to get in with the old guard for generations. But it takes a very practiced eye and an a lot of restraint. Nancy Reagan was actually pretty successful at this. She found a way to fit right in with the old money Republican women even though she was a child actress from NYC who had spent years in Hollywood. She understood how to make that look authentic for her. After all, it's just costuming.

I'm not saying you have to do this -- I don't actually care if politicians or their families are "old money." I like it when people do their own thing. Michelle Obama never tried to look like old money. Neither did Betty Ford or Rosalynn Carter. They were just themselves and it worked for them. But Trump's family, but especially Ivanka, seems to desperately want to emulate that old money look and it always looks so fake and bad to me. I think she must have very low self esteem and not really know how to simply be herself. She takes after her dad in that way -- they are both always trying to play a role and not very well. Yet they fail up. I don't know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love Melania's dress, sorry, I should stay off this forum.

She looked beautiful and the gown was custom. It was daring (for American fashion tbh, Americans are less daring, esp first ladies) and unusual for an inaugural gown. It’s hard to pull off a choker and Melania did. She trended less colonial and more continental today, and it’s disconcerting to some of the hayseeds.

Ivanka followed suit. They both looked fantastic.

Why is Vanky doing these modeling poses?

Why is she even in the spotlight alone? She's daughter of the President. I don't remember any other family members celebrating their association with the inaugural person to this extent - of any presidency.

After her complete face and body demolition/renovation she believes she qualifies as a model.

[Anonymous]

Just stopping in to say that I loved Melania’s subtle nod to Al Capone with the hat!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we have a discussion about why the Trump women who are literal billionaires and grew up with access to the finest ateliers since birth are so...tacky? How can you even make a famous gown Audrey Hepburn wore tacky?

They are relatively new money. They are gaudy, lack any real substance or charisma. They are on the same level as the Kardashians.

It's not an excuse. You can be new money and have impeccable taste -- socialites have used great taste to get in with the old guard for generations. But it takes a very practiced eye and an a lot of restraint. Nancy Reagan was actually pretty successful at this. She found a way to fit right in with the old money Republican women even though she was a child actress from NYC who had spent years in Hollywood. She understood how to make that look authentic for her. After all, it's just costuming.

I'm not saying you have to do this -- I don't actually care if politicians or their families are "old money." I like it when people do their own thing. Michelle Obama never tried to look like old money. Neither did Betty Ford or Rosalynn Carter. They were just themselves and it worked for them. But Trump's family, but especially Ivanka, seems to desperately want to emulate that old money look and it always looks so fake and bad to me. I think she must have very low self esteem and not really know how to simply be herself. She takes after her dad in that way -- they are both always trying to play a role and not very well. Yet they fail up. I don't know.

Ivanka is cosplaying a film noir actress. She looks so costumey and fake. Her plastic surgery is so distracting. She would look more authentic and classy if she had natural features.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we have a discussion about why the Trump women who are literal billionaires and grew up with access to the finest ateliers since birth are so...tacky? How can you even make a famous gown Audrey Hepburn wore tacky?

They are relatively new money. They are gaudy, lack any real substance or charisma. They are on the same level as the Kardashians.

It's not an excuse. You can be new money and have impeccable taste -- socialites have used great taste to get in with the old guard for generations. But it takes a very practiced eye and an a lot of restraint. Nancy Reagan was actually pretty successful at this. She found a way to fit right in with the old money Republican women even though she was a child actress from NYC who had spent years in Hollywood. She understood how to make that look authentic for her. After all, it's just costuming.

I'm not saying you have to do this -- I don't actually care if politicians or their families are "old money." I like it when people do their own thing. Michelle Obama never tried to look like old money. Neither did Betty Ford or Rosalynn Carter. They were just themselves and it worked for them. But Trump's family, but especially Ivanka, seems to desperately want to emulate that old money look and it always looks so fake and bad to me. I think she must have very low self esteem and not really know how to simply be herself. She takes after her dad in that way -- they are both always trying to play a role and not very well. Yet they fail up. I don't know.

We are a society that worships people like the Kardashians unfortunately. Unsure how we ended up here?

[Anonymous]

^^. maybe Elon can build a time machine.

I imagine Ivanka at her home computer and reading the comments from this thread. LOL. That sassy grandma, russian stripper, toddler and tiara, monarch mimic!