Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

Wow, you’re weird.

Wow, my post touched a nerve. Meghan the narc.

How is calling someone a narc not also a vile insult?

It is an assessment of her personality.

Vile insults are more like trashy, gold digger, social climber, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

It actually gives a lot of balanced insights on how the attitudes toward Harry and Meghan changed.

Just in case anyone else is thinking of clicking this. It’s not worth giving them the traffic poorly written quasi fan fiction with nary a source cited.

[Anonymous]

My guess is MM gave Harry an ultimatum.

"Harry, you've hated these last 40 yrs of life under a microscope, the Paps in every direction, and now scrutiny from social media. I dont know how you can endure it much longer. I've put up it with it for a year and it is driving me mad inside. And what about Archie? Our dream, yes? And W&K are beyond smug. It is a wonder you two are only now just drifting apart. You should've spoken up to him years ago. We can't do this anymore. You're tired. I'm tired. We're done here, hon"

"Look, MM, I love you to pieces and I am thrilled to have found you in my life. You and archie mean the world to me, but i can't leave Palace life. It is who i am whether i want it or not. I have a duty. My whole family is here. My whole life".

"No, harry! Your life is with me and Archie now. It is either us or them!! Which one will it be??!!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My guess is MM gave Harry an ultimatum.

"Harry, you've hated these last 40 yrs of life under a microscope, the Paps in every direction, and now scrutiny from social media. I dont know how you can endure it much longer. I've put up it with it for a year and it is driving me mad inside. And what about Archie? Our dream, yes? And W&K are beyond smug. It is a wonder you two are only now just drifting apart. You should've spoken up to him years ago. We can't do this anymore. You're tired. I'm tired. We're done here, hon"

"Look, MM, I love you to pieces and I am thrilled to have found you in my life. You and archie mean the world to me, but i can't leave Palace life. It is who i am whether i want it or not. I have a duty. My whole family is here. My whole life".

"No, harry! Your life is with me and Archie now. It is either us or them!! Which one will it be??!!"

LOL, that’s some good fanfic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Again, you MM stans have no arguments except bringing in William, Charles or Andrew. So lame.

What is a stan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

Wow, you’re weird.

Wow, my post touched a nerve. Meghan the narc.

How is calling someone a narc not also a vile insult?

+100

[Anonymous]

Some of you are reading narc like NARK, drug related.

The person meant narcissist. Any of us who have the sad experience with narcissists could see it in MM a mile away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

It actually gives a lot of balanced insights on how the attitudes toward Harry and Meghan changed.

I could argue for hours about this article but I won't. Suffice it to say its neutralish in some senses and it also glosses over a lot of crap that was directed at Meghan Markle to put mostly Kate and William into a good light. Makes Harry just look lost.

This paragraph for instance is a flat out lie -

and the brothers’ relationship soured when words were exchanged between Kate and bride-to-be Meghan over the dress Princess Charlotte, now four, would wear as a bridesmaid.

At one stage Kate was said to have been reduced to tears. But no one attached too much significance to the kind of small family tiff hardly unknown during nuptial preparations.

I find it interesting that the British media don't realize that online articles are forever. They spent WEEKS lambasting Meghan for 'making Kate cry' in article after article. Only months later did they try to attribute it to 'post-partum stress' on Kate's part.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7839296/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-cry-princess-charlotte-royal-wedding-dress/
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/11/kate-middleton-princess-charlotte-fitting-tears-meghan-harry-wedding
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fractured-royal-relationship-how-meghan-markle-made-kate-middleton-cry
https://www.independent.ie/style/celebrity/celebrity-news/revealed-why-kate-middleton-was-left-in-tears-during-bridesmaid-dress-fitting-with-meghan-markle-37644051.html
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/strict-demands-of-bride-meghan-markle-led-to-kate-middletons-tears/news-story/2d6a2d52269812551c466e17610b8925



For something they say was attached not much significance, they sure made a big deal out of it. And that was just one example. Piling on to Meghan was a form of emotional abuse and they're all guilty.

But I don't blame this one writer. All the British media are hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Again, you MM stans have no arguments except bringing in William, Charles or Andrew. So lame.

What is a stan?

A psycho, desperate fan. See the Eminem/Dido music video by the same name. I think that video was big in 2000...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are reading narc like NARK, drug related.

The person meant narcissist. Any of us who have the sad experience with narcissists could see it in MM a mile away.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are reading narc like NARK, drug related.

The person meant narcissist. Any of us who have the sad experience with narcissists could see it in MM a mile away.

Not any of us. I know someone actually diagnosed with NPD. But, I don't have any interaction with Meghan and therefore am unable to draw any conclusions about her mental stability. I also have a healthy amount of doubt about my ability to size up someone from press articles. You might want to employ some od this skepticism. Thinking you're able to make a diagnosis of someone you've never met is an awfully inflated sense of your own capabilities. A bit arrogant really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

Wow, you’re weird.

Wow, my post touched a nerve. Meghan the narc.

How is calling someone a narc not also a vile insult?

+100

Narcissistic personality disorder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

Wow, you’re weird.

Wow, my post touched a nerve. Meghan the narc.

How is calling someone a narc not also a vile insult?

It is an assessment of her personality.

And weirdness is an assessment of your personality...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Again, you MM stans have no arguments except bringing in William, Charles or Andrew. So lame.

What is a stan?

A psycho, desperate fan. See the Eminem/Dido music video by the same name. I think that video was big in 2000...

What do you call psycho, desperate haters? See most of this thread. Big in 2020.

[Anonymous]

So the basis for calling Megan a narc is that she broke away from her manipulative dad/sister & they decided to raise their kid outside of the spotlight? Really?