Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Emotionally vulnerable, he just admitted he had PTSD in latest Africa documentary with Meghan. He’s an alleged long-time substance abuser. Known for drinking heavily and having anger issues. Yeah, I’d call him vulnerable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Again, you MM stans have no arguments except bringing in William, Charles or Andrew. So lame.

[Anonymous]

Who’s the Daddy? Remember when Harry joked about that in Morocco?

The truth is coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

And they tried to once again steal the limelight from another royal by announcing it around Kate’s birthday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Again, you MM stans have no arguments except bringing in William, Charles or Andrew. So lame.

You mean his brother, father and uncle? Yes, how strange it is to bring them into the conversation.

[Anonymous]

How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Again, you MM stans have no arguments except bringing in William, Charles or Andrew. So lame.

You mean his brother, father and uncle? Yes, how strange it is to bring them into the conversation.

But WHY? They are not relevant to Meghan and Harry in this discussion. If you can’t understand that, I feel sorry for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

A better read that predicted this a year ago.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-royal-rift-j3cft5d3d

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

It actually gives a lot of balanced insights on how the attitudes toward Harry and Meghan changed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Stuff it, sister. Your fave has been exposed as the money grabbing gold digger many suspected from go. I feel sorry for the gullible sobs who believed in the humanitarian, Mother Theresa, greatest love story ever told, this must all be so terribly shocking. The jig is up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

A better read that predicted this a year ago.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-royal-rift-j3cft5d3d

Can not access full article

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

Wow, you’re weird.

Wow, my post touched a nerve. Meghan the narc.

How is calling someone a narc not also a vile insult?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This article puts a fair sympathetic spin on things and from someone credible and who likely had actual knowledge: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-feel-they-are-being-driven-out-says-friend-its-sad/.

If all of the products/trademarking end up going to benefit a charity or charities, I have no concerns.

Snort!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, some of us see Meghan as a malicious narc who preyed on a vulnerable Prince Harry. That’s how I see her. Her vicious followers have thrown vile insults at Kate, William and the Queen.

Wow, you’re weird.

Wow, my post touched a nerve. Meghan the narc.

How is calling someone a narc not also a vile insult?

It is an assessment of her personality.