Official Abortion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.

There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.

So you don’t believe children should have a right to parental support?

No.

So child neglect is okay? We should just do away with CPS/DFS since parents have no responsibilities regarding their children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.

There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.

That's a completely incoherent point of view. But go ahead and continue to try to use your HS debate tactics.

Why is it incoherent?

Why do you support one and not the other?

A woman shouldn’t be compelled to do something she doesn’t want to, and likewise a man shouldn’t either

So it’s not really about the rights of the child for you, it’s just about punishing women for not behaving the way men want. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.

There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.

That's a completely incoherent point of view. But go ahead and continue to try to use your HS debate tactics.

Why is it incoherent?

Why do you support one and not the other?

A woman shouldn’t be compelled to do something she doesn’t want to, and likewise a man shouldn’t either

So it’s not really about the rights of the child for you, it’s just about punishing women for not behaving the way men want. Got it.

Yep. The incels have decided to make this their next issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.

There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.

That's a completely incoherent point of view. But go ahead and continue to try to use your HS debate tactics.

Why is it incoherent?

Why do you support one and not the other?

A woman shouldn’t be compelled to do something she doesn’t want to, and likewise a man shouldn’t either

So it’s not really about the rights of the child for you, it’s just about punishing women for not behaving the way men want. Got it.

Yep. The incels have decided to make this their next issue.

Seems counterproductive, since the inability to have an abortion will only make women that much less likely to sleep with them. Who wants to risk being bound to someone like that for life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Someone here has to care about the children.
This more of us, the better...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

No, she didn’t. But idiot pro-birthed try to push that narrative - taking her comments out of context. She did more for “inferior” people than most others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

Not true. If you look in DC, many of the PP locations are in wealthy neighborhoods. There's one right near the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

Yeah as if we believe that you would have anything but a sneer to give poor minority women who give birth to children they need a social safety net to help raise. You hypocrite. I bet you’ve used the phrase “welfare queen” derisively against poor minority mothers and you think poor black children deserve the poverty that keeps them down. I bet you’ve voted against raising taxes to improve schools in poor neighborhoods and you think poor mothers of babies should be required to work to get food stamps and housing vouchers even if they have no affordable childcare options and never finished school because they had to drop out after giving birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

No, she didn’t. But idiot pro-birthed try to push that narrative - taking her comments out of context. She did more for “inferior” people than most others.

Spare me your false concern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.

It's interesting that I never hear anyone say they've been to PP for healthcare. They do mention going to "doc in a box," emergency room, primary care physician, internist, OB/GYN, or the health dept.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.

It's interesting that I never hear anyone say they've been to PP for healthcare. They do mention going to "doc in a box," emergency room, primary care physician, internist, OB/GYN, or the health dept.

Are you a man? Do you think women are going to discuss their annual exam with you?

I know a lot of women who went to PP for their annuals and for birth control when they were in college and just starting out in their career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.

And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.

I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.

PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.

It's interesting that I never hear anyone say they've been to PP for healthcare. They do mention going to "doc in a box," emergency room, primary care physician, internist, OB/GYN, or the health dept.

Huh? You must be a man. I got birth control all through grad school from PP, and got a mammogram and breast ultrasound there when I found a lump.