Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wow. Vance is good.

+1

Things I can’t believe Walz said: he’s a knucklehead, he has bad grammar, he’s friends with school shooters, and the whole panic ramble about Tiananmen square. He had wild eyes and a very uncomfortable vibe about him.

DP. So was Walz at Tiananmen Square? I'm confused by his answer.

No, he went to China about a month or two after the actual Tianamen Square massacre. But my memory (I'm about his age) is that the protest movement and the ensuing crackdown was larger than just that one day. So he may have been remembering the general vibe and not the specific day. Or he may have meant to say he was there "in the wake of" Tianemen Square and short-handed that. It was a dumb unforced error on his part, but I don't think it was a malicious lie.

Meanwhile, Trump and Vance spread malicious lies about 40 times a day, but that's okay. Let's focus on one time Tim Walz mis-spoke about his trips to China. Good Lord. The GOP is so desperate.

The problem with Walz that it is not just one time. He continues correcting himself as "misspoke" on so many instances when he got caught. I don't give a f about Trump or Vance, but picking Tim was a huge mistake for democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What were the actual policy points that JD laid out last night.... Like what is his position on who won the 2020 election on affordable child care on affordable healthcare??

Go replay it or read the transcript, he was very clear and articulate.

[Anonymous]

Anyone wondering why the debate moderators didn’t talk about:

-the military service records of either candidate?

-the two assassination attempts on Trump’s life?

Why were those topics not covered?

[Anonymous]

To the poster who does not know what a Kamala lighthouse will offer... For starter, she will offer my daughter the ability to make decisions over her own body and Get the healthcare that she and her doctors know she needs not bleed out in the parking lot of a hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wow. Vance is good.

+1

Things I can’t believe Walz said: he’s a knucklehead, he has bad grammar, he’s friends with school shooters, and the whole panic ramble about Tiananmen square. He had wild eyes and a very uncomfortable vibe about him.

DP. So was Walz at Tiananmen Square? I'm confused by his answer.

No, he went to China about a month or two after the actual Tianamen Square massacre. But my memory (I'm about his age) is that the protest movement and the ensuing crackdown was larger than just that one day. So he may have been remembering the general vibe and not the specific day. Or he may have meant to say he was there "in the wake of" Tianemen Square and short-handed that. It was a dumb unforced error on his part, but I don't think it was a malicious lie.

Meanwhile, Trump and Vance spread malicious lies about 40 times a day, but that's okay. Let's focus on one time Tim Walz mis-spoke about his trips to China. Good Lord. The GOP is so desperate.

The problem with Walz that it is not just one time. He continues correcting himself as "misspoke" on so many instances when he got caught. I don't give a f about Trump or Vance, but picking Tim was a huge mistake for democrats.

The false equivalence is breathtaking. He misspoke about when he was in China. Vance called Trump "America's Hitler". These two are not the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone wondering why the debate moderators didn’t talk about:

-the military service records of either candidate?

-the two assassination attempts on Trump’s life?

Why were those topics not covered?

Because what do either of those have to do with policy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What were the actual policy points that JD laid out last night.... Like what is his position on who won the 2020 election on affordable child care on affordable healthcare??

Go replay it or read the transcript, he was very clear and articulate.

All I got was he is married to A nice looking woman and child care is a young woman issue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vance came off as very likeable.

I thought he came off very slick, his facial expressions just a tad smug, bordering on know-it-all, with a whiff of condescension. It was totally apparent this is a guy who knows how to do PR on the fly. Rewriting Trump's actions in the telling, with such easy-breezy confidence was infuriating. Maybe that's the benefit of Yale law school training.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone wondering why the debate moderators didn’t talk about:

-the military service records of either candidate?

-the two assassination attempts on Trump’s life?

Why were those topics not covered?

Because what do either of those have to do with policy?

So the candidate’s background and current events are irrelevant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Walz, the governor of Minnesota, seemed to get off on the wrong foot right from the start when he mixed up Iran and Israel when asked about how he would advise the president on a preemptive strike by Israel against Iran.

“Iran, or I, uh, Israel’s ability to be able to defend itself is fundamental,” he said initially. Moments later he said “the expansion of Israel and its proxies” is a fundamental necessity for the United States to steady leadership there.


Other times, Walz seemed nervous and unsure of himself. He spoke so rapidly at times that he stumbled over his words.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/01/who-won-vp-debate/75351338007/

USA Today is correct; Walz looked and sounded extremely nervous and made verbal stumbles throughout the night.

Vance was calm, cool, and collected. He never responded in anger or frustration, or took the bait and made the debate contentious. He gave a master class in political debate.

Every politician has rich friends, takes money from their rich friends.


Case in point:

Walz looked like the weirdo…apparently the whole “Vance is weird” thing was a deflection and projection on the part of democrats, who
have an old looking man who lies about everything running as their VP.

Anyone fact check Walz’s claim that his son witnessed a shooting? Any evidence that actually happened?

Yep

One side is Soros, other side is Thiel. Same same

Vance looks like he could deal with world leaders

Voting for Vance cos anything could happen to Trump in 4 years

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Walz looks so angry?

If you had to pretend you loved Donald Trump wouldn't you be angry, too?

No. But Walz has deep wrinkles of angry man, he is not angry because of today's debate, he has been angry for years.

Life gives people the face they deserve.

This is not how the wrinkle formed. He probably was angry most of his life and never developed smiling wrinkles around his mouth and around his eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance came off as very likeable.

I thought he came off very slick, his facial expressions just a tad smug, bordering on know-it-all, with a whiff of condescension. It was totally apparent this is a guy who knows how to do PR on the fly. Rewriting Trump's actions in the telling, with such easy-breezy confidence was infuriating. Maybe that's the benefit of Yale law school training.

Usha was heavily involved in preparing him to debate. It is refreshing to hear highly educated people speaking in public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance came off as very likeable.

I thought he came off very slick, his facial expressions just a tad smug, bordering on know-it-all, with a whiff of condescension. It was totally apparent this is a guy who knows how to do PR on the fly. Rewriting Trump's actions in the telling, with such easy-breezy confidence was infuriating. Maybe that's the benefit of Yale law school training.

Usha was heavily involved in preparing him to debate. It is refreshing to hear highly educated people speaking in public.

So I bet you love hearing Obama talk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish Tim would have worn his glasses

"I'm a knucklehead at times... I misspoke on this," Walz admitted when addressing discrepancies in his reported travel history to Hong Kong in 1989, as reported by several news outlets.

Does he and his wife have a same medical condition? They both look a little bit crazy with bulging eyes. I am not saying it is a mental condition, could be just a thyroid issues.

Walz actually looked scared at times last night.

At times? He looks like that an entire debate. He did not smile once, only negativity.

Now that you mention it…that really is true. Did Walz smile at all? It was a debate, of course time to be serious and dignified, but also show some warmth for the American people. Walz showed negative warmth.

There was no warmth, just negative vibes and fears. Look at his posture at Soros' place. He looks like a servant to Soros there, very timid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance came off as very likeable.

I thought he came off very slick, his facial expressions just a tad smug, bordering on know-it-all, with a whiff of condescension. It was totally apparent this is a guy who knows how to do PR on the fly. Rewriting Trump's actions in the telling, with such easy-breezy confidence was infuriating. Maybe that's the benefit of Yale law school training.

Usha was heavily involved in preparing him to debate. It is refreshing to hear highly educated people speaking in public.

So I bet you love hearing Obama talk

I LOVE Obama! Vance speech and presentation was at his level. Walz was not.