Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]wow. Vance is good.[/quote] +1 Things I can’t believe Walz said: he’s a knucklehead, he has bad grammar, he’s friends with school shooters, and the whole panic ramble about Tiananmen square. He had wild eyes and a very uncomfortable vibe about him. [/quote] DP. So was Walz at Tiananmen Square? I'm confused by his answer.[/quote] No, he went to China about a month or two after the actual Tianamen Square massacre. But my memory (I'm about his age) is that the protest movement and the ensuing crackdown was larger than just that one day. So he may have been remembering the general vibe and not the specific day. Or he may have meant to say he was there "in the wake of" Tianemen Square and short-handed that. It was a dumb unforced error on his part, but I don't think it was a malicious lie. [/quote] Meanwhile, Trump and Vance spread malicious lies about 40 times a day, but that's okay. Let's focus on one time Tim Walz mis-spoke about his trips to China. Good Lord. The GOP is so desperate.[/quote] The problem with Walz that it is not just one time. He continues correcting himself as "misspoke" on so many instances when he got caught. I don't give a f about Trump or Vance, but picking Tim was a huge mistake for democrats. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics