Ah Texas, you never disappoint - private citizen shoots suspect

[Anonymous]

TX man has apple airtag in his car. Tracks down thief. SHOOTs and KILLs person.

TX police haven't yet decided if the shooter will be charged.!!!

https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-man-uses-apple-airtag-track-person-stole-truck-kills-police

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:TX man has apple airtag in his car. Tracks down thief. SHOOTs and KILLs person.

TX police haven't yet decided if the shooter will be charged.!!!

https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-man-uses-apple-airtag-track-person-stole-truck-kills-police

Did he sneak up on the man in his car and kill him? Or was there an altercation of some kind?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TX man has apple airtag in his car. Tracks down thief. SHOOTs and KILLs person.

TX police haven't yet decided if the shooter will be charged.!!!

https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-man-uses-apple-airtag-track-person-stole-truck-kills-police

Did he sneak up on the man in his car and kill him? Or was there an altercation of some kind?

Article says suspect was unaware he was being tracked.
Windows had been shot out at the scene.

[Anonymous]

Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TX man has apple airtag in his car. Tracks down thief. SHOOTs and KILLs person.

TX police haven't yet decided if the shooter will be charged.!!!

https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-man-uses-apple-airtag-track-person-stole-truck-kills-police

Did he sneak up on the man in his car and kill him? Or was there an altercation of some kind?

Police said the man saw his truck in the parking lot, walked up to the stolen vehicle in an attempt to confront the person inside, and some sort of disagreement ensued. Soliz said he could not confirm if the man and the suspected thief argued, but said the car theft victim told police he believed the suspected thief pulled out a gun which prompted "a firefight."

Police said that, at this time, they believe the car thief victim is the only person to have fired shots and could not confirm if there was more than one weapon found at the crime scene.

The suspected thief, another man, was shot and pronounced dead, Soliz said. His identity has not been released. The car theft victim reportedly stayed at the scene of the shooting, complied with police, and was taken into custody for questioning. The shooter is not expected to face charges, Soliz said, but noted an investigation is ongoing.

https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/san-antonio-airtag-shooting-17871230.php

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

Name on progressive DA who is soft on car jackers. Go ahead I’ll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

I'm not saying it is right.... I am telling you what to expect when citizens sense that law is not being enforced.
We really need more information. According to one article, the man thought the suspect had a gun. We will have to see if more info is forthcoming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

Cops don't care. He called, they said that they'd get to it when they get to it. Texas use of force law is more generous than just about any other state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

I'm not saying it is right.... I am telling you what to expect when citizens sense that law is not being enforced.
We really need more information. According to one article, the man thought the suspect had a gun. We will have to see if more info is forthcoming.

It doesn't really matter in Texas. Deadly force is justified to prevent robbery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

Name on progressive DA who is soft on car jackers. Go ahead I’ll wait.

This was not a car jacking. It was a stolen vehicle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

I'm not saying it is right.... I am telling you what to expect when citizens sense that law is not being enforced.
We really need more information. According to one article, the man thought the suspect had a gun. We will have to see if more info is forthcoming.

It doesn't really matter in Texas. Deadly force is justified to prevent robbery

Not sure this was a robbery. If the thief was in the act of stealing the car from him at that moment, most people would say the shooting was justified. I don’t think this situation is the same.

[Anonymous]

Good thing it wasn’t the suspect’s teenage kid driving the car. Or his wife. Or it hadn’t been sold to an unsuspecting third party. SMH

Guilty until proven innocent, with the death penalty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

I'm not saying it is right.... I am telling you what to expect when citizens sense that law is not being enforced.
We really need more information. According to one article, the man thought the suspect had a gun. We will have to see if more info is forthcoming.

It doesn't really matter in Texas. Deadly force is justified to prevent robbery

Not sure this was a robbery. If the thief was in the act of stealing the car from him at that moment, most people would say the shooting was justified. I don’t think this situation is the same.

Once the owner was there, if the guy does exit the car, it's a robbery. They've already announced that no charges are expected

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vigilante justice.

And, we will be seeing more of it - particularly in areas that have progressive DAs who are soft on crime. When citizens don't trust that the law will be enforced, they take matters into their own hands.

So “taking the law into your own hands” means killing someone without giving them the benefit of due process?

Also, if the car had an air tag, it would have been easy for cops to track it without the need for the car owner to do it himself.

I'm not saying it is right.... I am telling you what to expect when citizens sense that law is not being enforced.
We really need more information. According to one article, the man thought the suspect had a gun. We will have to see if more info is forthcoming.

It doesn't really matter in Texas. Deadly force is justified to prevent robbery

Not sure this was a robbery. If the thief was in the act of stealing the car from him at that moment, most people would say the shooting was justified. I don’t think this situation is the same.

Once the owner was there, if the guy does exit the car, it's a robbery. They've already announced that no charges are expected

Yeah that’s crap.
The robbery had already occurred. This was retaliation.