Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems as if the liberals here are desperately looking for something. You see that all the ridiculous allegations of sexual assault are falling apart.
So, you go for another “nail in the coffin.”
“He has a drinking problem!!” Sure, and the FBI missed it in 6 background investigations.
“He has a temper!” Sure. He was defending himself from heinous accusations, and you want him to be calm like this was a job interview.
“He committed perjury!“ Good luck with that. So far, nothing you have thrown out as “perjury” holds water.

Face it - you are desperate to derail his nomination. When Schumer says, “We will do whatever it takes,” he’s not kidding. I never thought you’d sink this low.

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a23511160/brett-kavanaugh-lies-about-everything/

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-lies_us_5bb26190e4b027da00d61fcd

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/kavanaugh-lied-senate-judiciary-committee.html

and most of all

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying

Meh. They don’t care if he is lying - at all. They obviously don’t care when Trump does it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh should take a polygraph, just like Ford did.

Is it okay if it's privately administered, and then he provides those results to the FBI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He testified under oath that he became aware of the Ramirez allegation when the New Yorker story came out on September 23. Text messages show he was preparing a defense to those allegations in July.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/mutual-friend-ramirez-kavanaugh-anxious-come-forward-evidence-n915566

This plus the lie of not being sure about the wedding when he had a photo of it... Wow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh should take a polygraph, just like Ford did.

Is it okay if it's privately administered, and then he provides those results to the FBI?

Yes. And he should be able to know what the two questions will be ahead of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Swetnick's boyfriend of 7 years delivered a scary profile of Swetnick's emotional, psychological challenges...history of false accusations

You mean the guy who sued her and was thrown out of court?

Did anyone else notice the Fox News article said she threatened his wife, his family and to kill ’his’ unborn baby all in one breath? Meaning he was cheating on his wife with her? Their writing was all over the place I couldn't make the timeline. I want the answer to be yes because it would be hilarious /so telling if Fox would take the statement of a cheater to discredit his AP. Family Values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh should take a polygraph, just like Ford did.

Is it okay if it's privately administered, and then he provides those results to the FBI?

Yes. And he should be able to know what the two questions will be ahead of time.

She told her entire story at the polygraph! The "two questions" were asking if any part of it was false or made up. Why don't you actually learn the facts before you spout this nonsense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Swetnick's boyfriend of 7 years delivered a scary profile of Swetnick's emotional, psychological challenges...history of false accusations

You mean the guy who sued her and was thrown out of court?

Did anyone else notice the Fox News article said she threatened his wife, his family and to kill ’his’ unborn baby all in one breath? Meaning he was cheating on his wife with her? Their writing was all over the place I couldn't make the timeline. I want the answer to be yes because it would be hilarious /so telling if Fox would take the statement of a cheater to discredit his AP. Family Values.

You didn’t see his interview....
She was essentially stalking him after he broke up with her. She is a loon. She would have to be slightly “off” considering who she hired for her attorney.

[Anonymous]

First Kavanaugh was an attempted rapist; didn't step down
Then he because a mass rapist; didn't step down
Then the pivot was that he lied under oath; hasn't stepped down

And there are still people who don't see through the playbook.

[Anonymous]

^^ became a mass rapist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First Kavanaugh was an attempted rapist; didn't step down
Then he because a mass rapist; didn't step down
Then the pivot was that he lied under oath; hasn't stepped down

And there are still people who don't see through the playbook.

One of those is not like the other.

Intelligence like this helps me understand how Republicans can support people like Trump and kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

With the possible exception of Ford, the "alleged" victims don't have my sympathies because I think they're completely unbelievable and seem to have conveniently come out of the woodwork at an opportune time.

Ramierez has contemporaries backing her story.
The third accuser claims she filed a complaint at the time, Montgomery County said it would take a month to find it. Conveniently, the Judge's mother was the lead prosecutor for teen delinquency in Montgomery County at the time.

I withhold full judgement on these until the facts are borne out.

And that doesn't even raise suspicions in your mind, that a third accuser says she filed a complaint but can't prove it right away (surprise - way to try and extend investigation) and in a weird twist of fate for the accuser, Kavanaugh's mother happened to be lead prosecutor.

I swear, screenwriters and helping with this crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First Kavanaugh was an attempted rapist; didn't step down
Then he because a mass rapist; didn't step down
Then the pivot was that he lied under oath; hasn't stepped down

And there are still people who don't see through the playbook.

One of those is not like the other.

Intelligence like this helps me understand how Republicans can support people like Trump and kavanaugh

Democrats are pivoting so much, I'm surprised there aren't dents in the Senate floor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Swetnick's boyfriend of 7 years delivered a scary profile of Swetnick's emotional, psychological challenges...history of false accusations

You mean the guy who sued her and was thrown out of court?

Did anyone else notice the Fox News article said she threatened his wife, his family and to kill ’his’ unborn baby all in one breath? Meaning he was cheating on his wife with her? Their writing was all over the place I couldn't make the timeline. I want the answer to be yes because it would be hilarious /so telling if Fox would take the statement of a cheater to discredit his AP. Family Values.

You didn’t see his interview....
She was essentially stalking him after he broke up with her. She is a loon. She would have to be slightly “off” considering who she hired for her attorney.

Has it been discussed on this forum , that Swetnick's former employer says she falsified having a degree from John Hopkins on her resume and she brought false sexual harassment claims against four of her co-workers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First Kavanaugh was an attempted rapist; didn't step down
Then he because a mass rapist; didn't step down
Then the pivot was that he lied under oath; hasn't stepped down

And there are still people who don't see through the playbook.

One of those is not like the other.

Intelligence like this helps me understand how Republicans can support people like Trump and kavanaugh

Democrats are pivoting so much, I'm surprised there aren't dents in the Senate floor.

Even if you don't believe the allegations, no one forced kavanaugh to perjure himself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.