Queen Elizabeth II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

Well I do follow the royals and Anne works rather than keeping busy.
Your arrogance reminds me of Anne’s famous remark about Meghan Markel’s whining: “She’s an American, isn’t she.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay for the MM haters, what do you think about this interview? I can see why people would think the Oprah interview contained a lot of misunderstandings that made the royal family look bad or even fabrications, but this seems like Harry and MM were really screwed. More by the press, but some by the royal family.

https://twitter.com/nadinebh_/status/1569310145468923904

This has all been public. Some people say she's lying and going the mental he as both route so she can't be criticized. Some people believe her.
I believe her stress but I'm kind of over it and tired of Harry's whining.

Sure it has been public but I am just wondering what people think of it. I know she can be criticized for other things, sure, but I just think it's really odd that people can see British tabloids attacking her relentlessly for her race, for years, and then say she is making up the mental health issues. And then say that Harry should't have complained about the press so much? I don't understand that reaction. We don't have proof of Meghan's mental state but we do have proof of how terrible the tabloids were, and we have proof that Diana died because of how tabloids acted.

She was not attacked relentlessly for her race. She was attacked because she was perceived as someone who didn't care to learn about the rules and traditions of a very old, very conservative institution she entered voluntarily, and for whining when things didn't go her way.

Dig you head out of your own ass and read the multitude of articles saying negative comments about her race or referring to her race in a derogatory way. You just make yourself look really stupid.

Bonus points though for calling the person with suicidal thoughts a liar. That's exactly what they tell you to say to them.

I don't believe she was having suicidal thoughts, and I don't believe "most" criticism of Meghan had to do with race.

+1. A lot of Meghan's perceived "slights" towards her and her children were not slights at all but standard, pre-established protocol that has been around longer than she has been alive. She did understand, nor care to understand this, and instead decided it was directed AT HER, when it wasn't. Harry did her no favors by agreeing with her rather than explaining how titles/security/order of prededence works. Catherine was always going to be seated ahead of her by official Order of Precedence, and the same is true of Catherine's children. This has nothing to do with race, but simple birth order.

+2. The press was awful to Camilla and Kate for years too. It’s not like Meghan is special in this regard.

Camilla had bread rolls thrown at her. The public was vicious towards her. I think at this point they have a grudging respect for her for sticking it out despite the abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

That is their entire job. None of the royals are sitting on the bench curing cancer. They don’t care if it displease you.

I'm American, so I am sure they DGAF. But at the point that you have to describe attending ribbon-cuttings as "a job," you've pretty much made it clear that the royals are a waste of resources. Older Britons may not be ready to give up the monarchy, but when Charles pops his clogs? Or William? Buh-bye.

I'm sure that's what you said before Queen Elizabeth died. So many on here were just so sure King Charles was never going to happen. Face it, you don't understand how any of this works or what the British people want. They don't care what you want as an American, either.

100% agree. If I read one more idiot remark whining about they were so sure Charles would pass the throne over to William…

That was never, ever going to happen. No matter what some whiny American dope thinks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

Genuinely curious how you are privy to Queen Elizabeth’s will and know what her heirs will receive.

Centuries of precedence and reading lots and lots of articles on the matter. And even though we don't ever see the royal wills, it becomes pretty obvious in the subsquent years what happened. Here's just one of countless articles about it.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/13/business/prince-william-1-billion-inheritance/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

That is their entire job. None of the royals are sitting on the bench curing cancer. They don’t care if it displease you.

I'm American, so I am sure they DGAF. But at the point that you have to describe attending ribbon-cuttings as "a job," you've pretty much made it clear that the royals are a waste of resources. Older Britons may not be ready to give up the monarchy, but when Charles pops his clogs? Or William? Buh-bye.

I'm sure that's what you said before Queen Elizabeth died. So many on here were just so sure King Charles was never going to happen. Face it, you don't understand how any of this works or what the British people want. They don't care what you want as an American, either.

100% agree. If I read one more idiot remark whining about they were so sure Charles would pass the throne over to William…

That was never, ever going to happen. No matter what some whiny American dope thinks.

+1. Just like the poster who thinks Anne, Andrew, and Edward are about to get rich off their mother. Not going to happen either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

That is their entire job. None of the royals are sitting on the bench curing cancer. They don’t care if it displease you.

I'm American, so I am sure they DGAF. But at the point that you have to describe attending ribbon-cuttings as "a job," you've pretty much made it clear that the royals are a waste of resources. Older Britons may not be ready to give up the monarchy, but when Charles pops his clogs? Or William? Buh-bye.

I'm sure that's what you said before Queen Elizabeth died. So many on here were just so sure King Charles was never going to happen. Face it, you don't understand how any of this works or what the British people want. They don't care what you want as an American, either.

All the poster who claim the the royal family is aa irrelevant waste are too thick to understand that 75 pages prove them wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

That is their entire job. None of the royals are sitting on the bench curing cancer. They don’t care if it displease you.

I'm American, so I am sure they DGAF. But at the point that you have to describe attending ribbon-cuttings as "a job," you've pretty much made it clear that the royals are a waste of resources. Older Britons may not be ready to give up the monarchy, but when Charles pops his clogs? Or William? Buh-bye.

I'm sure that's what you said before Queen Elizabeth died. So many on here were just so sure King Charles was never going to happen. Face it, you don't understand how any of this works or what the British people want. They don't care what you want as an American, either.

All the poster who claim the the royal family is aa irrelevant waste are too thick to understand that 75 pages prove them wrong.

Some of these people get all their news from Twitter and TikTok and have never read an actual history book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

That is their entire job. None of the royals are sitting on the bench curing cancer. They don’t care if it displease you.

I'm American, so I am sure they DGAF. But at the point that you have to describe attending ribbon-cuttings as "a job," you've pretty much made it clear that the royals are a waste of resources. Older Britons may not be ready to give up the monarchy, but when Charles pops his clogs? Or William? Buh-bye.

I'm sure that's what you said before Queen Elizabeth died. So many on here were just so sure King Charles was never going to happen. Face it, you don't understand how any of this works or what the British people want. They don't care what you want as an American, either.

All the poster who claim the the royal family is aa irrelevant waste are too thick to understand that 75 pages prove them wrong.

There's over three times as many posts about the divorce of some random Christian "influencer" that most people (myself included) have never heard of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

That's not really working. And if you really think about it, the royals don't really work. And then there is wills and Kate who hardly do anything at all. Esp Kate.

No. That really is work on behalf of the United Kingdom

More than intelligence, Anne has the character, grace and work ethic of her mother. She is the one who will fill the Queen’s role as the heart of Britain as she quietly goes about her extensive duties with no complaint or fanfare. She was the first woman to stand at the Prince’s Vigil for her mother and accorded the Queen a deep curtsey as her body arrived in Edinburgh’s cathedral

Look for Anne to take a larger tile in support if Charles with her legendary competence and humility.

The Sussexes can return to their American celebrity while the true riyals soldier on.

Oh, come on. People like to tout Anne as "the hardest-working royal," but she isn't really working. She's keeping busy. She may deserve the title of "busiest royal" (I don't follow the royals enough to know the schedules), but appearing at ribbon-cuttings isn't work in the sense that she produces anything of value.

That is their entire job. None of the royals are sitting on the bench curing cancer. They don’t care if it displease you.

I'm American, so I am sure they DGAF. But at the point that you have to describe attending ribbon-cuttings as "a job," you've pretty much made it clear that the royals are a waste of resources. Older Britons may not be ready to give up the monarchy, but when Charles pops his clogs? Or William? Buh-bye.

I'm sure that's what you said before Queen Elizabeth died. So many on here were just so sure King Charles was never going to happen. Face it, you don't understand how any of this works or what the British people want. They don't care what you want as an American, either.

All the poster who claim the the royal family is aa irrelevant waste are too thick to understand that 75 pages prove them wrong.

There's over three times as many posts about the divorce of some random Christian "influencer" that most people (myself included) have never heard of.

That post is 2 years old. This one is 5 days old. Give this one a few more days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay for the MM haters, what do you think about this interview? I can see why people would think the Oprah interview contained a lot of misunderstandings that made the royal family look bad or even fabrications, but this seems like Harry and MM were really screwed. More by the press, but some by the royal family.

https://twitter.com/nadinebh_/status/1569310145468923904

This has all been public. Some people say she's lying and going the mental he as both route so she can't be criticized. Some people believe her.
I believe her stress but I'm kind of over it and tired of Harry's whining.

Sure it has been public but I am just wondering what people think of it. I know she can be criticized for other things, sure, but I just think it's really odd that people can see British tabloids attacking her relentlessly for her race, for years, and then say she is making up the mental health issues. And then say that Harry should't have complained about the press so much? I don't understand that reaction. We don't have proof of Meghan's mental state but we do have proof of how terrible the tabloids were, and we have proof that Diana died because of how tabloids acted.

She was not attacked relentlessly for her race. She was attacked because she was perceived as someone who didn't care to learn about the rules and traditions of a very old, very conservative institution she entered voluntarily, and for whining when things didn't go her way.

Dig you head out of your own ass and read the multitude of articles saying negative comments about her race or referring to her race in a derogatory way. You just make yourself look really stupid.

Bonus points though for calling the person with suicidal thoughts a liar. That's exactly what they tell you to say to them.

I don't believe she was having suicidal thoughts, and I don't believe "most" criticism of Meghan had to do with race.

+1. A lot of Meghan's perceived "slights" towards her and her children were not slights at all but standard, pre-established protocol that has been around longer than she has been alive. She did understand, nor care to understand this, and instead decided it was directed AT HER, when it wasn't. Harry did her no favors by agreeing with her rather than explaining how titles/security/order of prededence works. Catherine was always going to be seated ahead of her by official Order of Precedence, and the same is true of Catherine's children. This has nothing to do with race, but simple birth order.

+2. The press was awful to Camilla and Kate for years too. It’s not like Meghan is special in this regard.

I don’t think that the Meghan hate can be compared to Camilla
I also do not think that Kate ever had to go through what Meghan is experiencing

The Brittish are just strange. If it was any other person they would very much admit that obviously one person cannot be all fault, and no one person can be no fault

So they hate her because she is not Brittish, not one of them, a grown woman who also wants to keep some of her independence, still has dreams.
A woman like Kate who was in college to find a husband and whose only interest is to be a wife would never suit Harry

perhaps if you had gone to college like Kate (who has the highest level of education out of all 4 of them) you would know how to spell British

Both William and Catherine have a Master of Arts degree (in different majors) under the British system.

[Anonymous]

I'm sure I'm older than the rest of you but the negative press any of the women associated with the monarchy receive has been horrible for so long it would stun you. The women, including the queen, have been scutinized and insulted for such petty things. It's is shocking to me that most people who post her believe most of the things the trash tabloids make up about the women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

Genuinely curious how you are privy to Queen Elizabeth’s will and know what her heirs will receive.

Centuries of precedence and reading lots and lots of articles on the matter. And even though we don't ever see the royal wills, it becomes pretty obvious in the subsquent years what happened. Here's just one of countless articles about it.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/13/business/prince-william-1-billion-inheritance/index.html

It’s also how the entire system of inheritance amongst British aristocrats works, not just for the Royal family. Primogeniture is a thing. The eldest son inherits the title and the estates and the vast majority of the assets to keep them running. It’s how the British have kept their family estates going all these years. If they had diluted their fortunes by distributing assets equally among all the children, the fortunes would have disappeared very quickly. Look at the Vanderbilts in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

He seems happy.

Not a particular fan of Charles, or of continuing the monarchy, but that’s a crass thing to say. The royal family’s job is to help the country mourn their sovereign. It must be incredibly challenging to go out with a smile on one’s face and comfort the public over the death of someone who was symbolic to them, while the family privately mourns someone who meant so much more to them.

She was also 96. I am Jewish and when someone dies, friends and family make shiva calls. When the deceased is an elderly person with a life well lived- a sad and inevitable, but not shocking or tragic death- the shiva calls are not as morbid. There are smiles, there is conversation. Charles and the family have always known this day would come, and surely that level of preparation has helped them fulfill their roles here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

That’s why Anne’s kids have always worked. And Edward and Sophie have said they are raising their children with the expectation that they will need to work. Or marry well.

Anne was intelligent enough to give her kids the freedom to do what they chose with their lives. Everyone has to work, 73 year old King Charles has been flying around the country and attending engagements non stop for the past 4 days with little time to mourn his parent. That’s brutal.

He seems happy.

Not a particular fan of Charles, or of continuing the monarchy, but that’s a crass thing to say. The royal family’s job is to help the country mourn their sovereign. It must be incredibly challenging to go out with a smile on one’s face and comfort the public over the death of someone who was symbolic to them, while the family privately mourns someone who meant so much more to them.

She was also 96. I am Jewish and when someone dies, friends and family make shiva calls. When the deceased is an elderly person with a life well lived- a sad and inevitable, but not shocking or tragic death- the shiva calls are not as morbid. There are smiles, there is conversation. Charles and the family have always known this day would come, and surely that level of preparation has helped them fulfill their roles here.

He has broken out in tears on multiple occasions over the past few days, all caught on camera. So yes, while she lived a long life and they knew the end was coming, the loss of such a long personal relationship is very painful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gets what from the Queen in terms of inheritance? That’s what I’m dying to know!

Bulk goes to the heir. But she’ll probably have her will sealed for 100 years like Philipp did.

This. Most of the monarch’s wealth comes from the Duchy of Lancaster, which is now under Charles. And yes the details will not be released.

This is incorrect. There is monarchy’s/crown wealth and personal wealth. She has made a fortune just by breeding horses, that was just one of her side gigs. Andrew and her other kids will be well taken care of without needing to rely on Charles. That’s why Harry is hanging around too.

I didn’t say all, I said bulk and that is 100% true. The others will get peanuts in comparison to Charles. Not saying they will be destitute. The adult kids will be fine for their remaining days - they are already 70’s and 60’s. The grandkids (apart from William) will get something, but not enough to set then up for life with no need for additional income.

Genuinely curious how you are privy to Queen Elizabeth’s will and know what her heirs will receive.

Centuries of precedence and reading lots and lots of articles on the matter. And even though we don't ever see the royal wills, it becomes pretty obvious in the subsquent years what happened. Here's just one of countless articles about it.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/13/business/prince-william-1-billion-inheritance/index.html

Thank you. That is interesting