Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Clinton is a pig, too. They're all guilty! This isn't right-left thing.

For reasonable people this isn't a right left thing. For Trump's addled supporters, it certainly is.

I am a liberal but this thread has shown me it isn't just Trumpers that are turning this partisan. Plenty of Clinton defenders on here too, they all disgust me. I don't understand how 'get rid of all pedophiles and the people that protect them' can be twisted partisan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Clinton is a pig, too. They're all guilty! This isn't right-left thing.

For reasonable people this isn't a right left thing. For Trump's addled supporters, it certainly is.

I am a liberal but this thread has shown me it isn't just Trumpers that are turning this partisan. Plenty of Clinton defenders on here too, they all disgust me. I don't understand how 'get rid of all pedophiles and the people that protect them' can be twisted partisan.

Can you point to specific examples? Because I have yet to see anyone - here or anywhere - defending Clinton. I have heard plenty of people say that riding on the plane is not the same as participating in a child sex trafficking ring - and that we do not yet know the details of Clinton's relationship with Epstein, just as we don't know that Trump participated in a child sex trafficking ring with him. But unlike the Trump supporters who keep insisting that obviously Clinton is guilty and Trump innocent, I haven't seen anyone say it's cleat that Trump is guilty and Clinton is innocent.

Where are you seeing otherwise?

[Anonymous]

liberal here. Never voted for a Clinton. The 26 trips to Lolita Island disgusts me and I wish Bill, Donald and anyone else involved would be investigated further. I have a feeling everyone will get away with everything. And if anyone does go to jail, it'll probably be like Weinstein's lame ass sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Who was at Epstein ‘s “I’m outta jail’ party?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Clinton is a pig, too. They're all guilty! This isn't right-left thing.

For reasonable people this isn't a right left thing. For Trump's addled supporters, it certainly is.

I am a liberal but this thread has shown me it isn't just Trumpers that are turning this partisan. Plenty of Clinton defenders on here too, they all disgust me. I don't understand how 'get rid of all pedophiles and the people that protect them' can be twisted partisan.

Can you point to specific examples? Because I have yet to see anyone - here or anywhere - defending Clinton. I have heard plenty of people say that riding on the plane is not the same as participating in a child sex trafficking ring - and that we do not yet know the details of Clinton's relationship with Epstein, just as we don't know that Trump participated in a child sex trafficking ring with him. But unlike the Trump supporters who keep insisting that obviously Clinton is guilty and Trump innocent, I haven't seen anyone say it's cleat that Trump is guilty and Clinton is innocent.

Where are you seeing otherwise?

This thread is 74 pages long. I'm not searching the whole thing but posted an example of what I'm talking about from page 54. I have been following it from the beginning and it looks like Jeff has deleted a lot of off topic posts that I recall seeing. To me the gross liberal stuff comes in a couple of flavors:

1) A random one off unrelated to recent discussion partisan post that talks about how democrats are held accountable while Republicans get off (possibly true but not true here, clinton has gotten off just as cleanly as everyone else). IE, the world is so unfair we hold D's accountable but you just let those R's get away with anything. I find this repellent, two wrongs of course do not make a right.
2) Poster casting doubt over Clinton's skeevyness while sure of Trump's because of general republicans and Kenneth Starr's involvement with Epstein's legal team and the unlikely nature of Starr or any Republican protecting Clinton after coming across evidence of his being involved in a pedophile ring (while that same R/Starr is ALSO participating in the coverup and is bound by attorney client privilege)

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Trump kicked him out of Mar Lago, but Clinton got on the plane 26 times. Is this another pathetic attempt? Get Mueller on it!

2020 is gonna be a blow out

There’s no proof that Clinton flew 26 times.

Again, color me absolutely skeptical that anyone in the GOP would have quietly sat on evidence that Bill Clinton was guilty of child rape.

The only other explanation is that GOPers are implicated, as well.

It’s possible. And I’m definitely if the name them, prosecute them and punish them regardless of political affiliation party, but the GOP bloodlust for Bill Clinton is limitless. They would have used the media levers they controlled to use pinpoint accuracy in making his crimes public. There appear to be enough guilty in the media that they would happily assist as asked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Clinton is a pig, too. They're all guilty! This isn't right-left thing.

For reasonable people this isn't a right left thing. For Trump's addled supporters, it certainly is.

I am a liberal but this thread has shown me it isn't just Trumpers that are turning this partisan. Plenty of Clinton defenders on here too, they all disgust me. I don't understand how 'get rid of all pedophiles and the people that protect them' can be twisted partisan.

Can you point to specific examples? Because I have yet to see anyone - here or anywhere - defending Clinton. I have heard plenty of people say that riding on the plane is not the same as participating in a child sex trafficking ring - and that we do not yet know the details of Clinton's relationship with Epstein, just as we don't know that Trump participated in a child sex trafficking ring with him. But unlike the Trump supporters who keep insisting that obviously Clinton is guilty and Trump innocent, I haven't seen anyone say it's cleat that Trump is guilty and Clinton is innocent.

Where are you seeing otherwise?

This thread is 74 pages long. I'm not searching the whole thing but posted an example of what I'm talking about from page 54. I have been following it from the beginning and it looks like Jeff has deleted a lot of off topic posts that I recall seeing. To me the gross liberal stuff comes in a couple of flavors:

1) A random one off unrelated to recent discussion partisan post that talks about how democrats are held accountable while Republicans get off (possibly true but not true here, clinton has gotten off just as cleanly as everyone else). IE, the world is so unfair we hold D's accountable but you just let those R's get away with anything. I find this repellent, two wrongs of course do not make a right.
2) Poster casting doubt over Clinton's skeevyness while sure of Trump's because of general republicans and Kenneth Starr's involvement with Epstein's legal team and the unlikely nature of Starr or any Republican protecting Clinton after coming across evidence of his being involved in a pedophile ring (while that same R/Starr is ALSO participating in the coverup and is bound by attorney client privilege)

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Trump kicked him out of Mar Lago, but Clinton got on the plane 26 times. Is this another pathetic attempt? Get Mueller on it!

2020 is gonna be a blow out

There’s no proof that Clinton flew 26 times.

Again, color me absolutely skeptical that anyone in the GOP would have quietly sat on evidence that Bill Clinton was guilty of child rape.

The only other explanation is that GOPers are implicated, as well.

It’s possible. And I’m definitely if the name them, prosecute them and punish them regardless of political affiliation party, but the GOP bloodlust for Bill Clinton is limitless. They would have used the media levers they controlled to use pinpoint accuracy in making his crimes public. There appear to be enough guilty in the media that they would happily assist as asked.

Recognizing the Republican smear tactics for what they are isn't the same as excusing Democrats.

Is there proof Clinton went to that island 26 times? All I've seen are Republicans saying it, Clinton denying it, and Republicans saying Clinton is a liar. I'd be happy to see Clinton go to jail if he did actually do anything but so far it just sounds a lot like "BUT HER EMAILLLZZZZZZZ!"

[Anonymous]

There’s no proof that Clinton ever went to the island. There is proof of Clinton flying on Epstein‘s plane, to other places other than the island.

And, as one of the posters who was saying that there is no way that Ken Starr would cover something up if it involves Clinton, that’s not the same as defending Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Flight logs tell tales:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known

[Anonymous]

Ok OP asking for examples see the three posts that followed my examples!

[Anonymous]

Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile, why did the US Attorneys cave to these guerilla tactics?

“Acosta described a "year-long assault on the prosecution and prosecutors" in a 2011 letter that was cited in part in court filings and published in its entirety by the Daily Beast.
"I use the word assault intentionally, as the defense in this case was more aggressive than any which I, or the prosecutors in my office, had previously encountered," he wrote.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/07/12/us/jeffery-epstein-witness-intimidation/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fapple.news%2FAwmcc6mjFTn6kz3eYr_dgQA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:liberal here. Never voted for a Clinton. The 26 trips to Lolita Island disgusts me and I wish Bill, Donald and anyone else involved would be investigated further. I have a feeling everyone will get away with everything. And if anyone does go to jail, it'll probably be like Weinstein's lame ass sentence.

The “26 trips” is oft claimed, but never cited.

[Anonymous]

*acting if one can only be guilty if the other is

Typo in post above