Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Clinton is a pig, too. They're all guilty! This isn't right-left thing.

For reasonable people this isn't a right left thing. For Trump's addled supporters, it certainly is.

I am a liberal but this thread has shown me it isn't just Trumpers that are turning this partisan. Plenty of Clinton defenders on here too, they all disgust me. I don't understand how 'get rid of all pedophiles and the people that protect them' can be twisted partisan.

I'm a former Republican and conservative and I really don't see anyone defending Clinton. The facts are that Clinton has made a statement and has locked himself into a timeline of which times he flew on Epstein's plane and the destination of the flights. This can easily be corroborated by the FBI via Secret Service duty records. The popular statement of "26 visits to Epstein's island" seems to originate with Breitbart . There are no legitimate sources reporting this. If it did happen I think the truth will come out. Saying that the statement is not proven true is not defending Clinton. We owe it to the victims to be accurate. If Clinton molested teen girls he should face consequences. I don't know how you sleep at night turning this into a political issue. I guess these girls are just props to you. They are real humans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Clinton is your "LOOK SQUIRREL" thing here. Got it.

Trump and Epstein go back decades. Trump is the one who told NY Mag that he and Epstein share taste in young women, and that Epstein is a great guy.

SQUIRREL

Clinton is a pig, too. They're all guilty! This isn't right-left thing.

For reasonable people this isn't a right left thing. For Trump's addled supporters, it certainly is.

I am a liberal but this thread has shown me it isn't just Trumpers that are turning this partisan. Plenty of Clinton defenders on here too, they all disgust me. I don't understand how 'get rid of all pedophiles and the people that protect them' can be twisted partisan.

I'm a former Republican and conservative and I really don't see anyone defending Clinton. The facts are that Clinton has made a statement and has locked himself into a timeline of which times he flew on Epstein's plane and the destination of the flights. This can easily be corroborated by the FBI via Secret Service duty records. The popular statement of "26 visits to Epstein's island" seems to originate with Breitbart . There are no legitimate sources reporting this. If it did happen I think the truth will come out. Saying that the statement is not proven true is not defending Clinton. We owe it to the victims to be accurate. If Clinton molested teen girls he should face consequences. I don't know how you sleep at night turning this into a political issue. I guess these girls are just props to you. They are real humans.

I was taking you seriously until the last three sentences. I'm trying to say its NOT a political issue. I literally said basically the exact same thing you did, that people turning this into partisan games are disgusting. I have a lot more skepticism about Clinton than you do, and I'm a liberal who voted for HRC FWIW. And I see a lot of people trying to cast doubt on his tenuous ties while saying Trump's make him guilty. My position is they're both guilty and both should face consequences, along with everyone else in the black book on whatever side of the aisle they stand on.

[Anonymous]

Question: If someone is found to be blackmailed, does the person being blackmailed automatically lose their security clearance if in government?

[Anonymous]

Bill Clinton 'not telling the truth' about Jeffrey Epstein, says investigative journalist who first revealed allegations in 2010

Investigative journalist Conchita Sarnoff said Monday that former President Bill Clinton isn’t telling the truth when he says he "knows nothing" of the alleged crimes of Jeffrey Epstein.

Sarnoff, who’s the executive director of Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking and the author of her book “TrafficKing,” appeared on Fox News @ Night after an indictment alleging sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy was unsealed Monday morning against Epstein, while Clinton's spokesman issued a statement denying knowledge of Epstein's alleged behavior.

Clinton, meanwhile, said in a statement that he “knows nothing” about the “terrible crimes,” insisting that he took “a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane” in 2002 and 2003 – while his Secret Service detail traveled with him at all times – and that he had only brief meetings with Epstein.

“I know from the pilot logs and these are pilot logs that you know were written by different pilots and at different times that Clinton went, he was a guest of Epstein's 27 times,” she said, adding that “many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him and many times he did not.”

http://www.conchitasarnoff.com/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Question: If someone is found to be blackmailed, does the person being blackmailed automatically lose their security clearance if in government?

Not anymore.

[Anonymous]

I think we can all agree that the following are tainted by their relationship with Epstein: trump, Bill Clinton, Dershowitz, Acosta

You know who isn’t- Hillary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

You aren’t reading me right. It’s not liberal partisan bs to note that the rumor that Clinton rose on Epstein’s 20+ times started at Breitbart - so not at a place known for facts. Trump lives next to two of Epstein’s homes, is a self admitted sexual assault we with 20+ claims against him, raped his wife, raped a journalist, slept with two porn stars while married...

If either of these two is guilty, lock them up and throw away the key. If Prince Andrew is guilty, lock him up and throw away the key. But I want all the rapists’ names to come out and I want them all to face justice no matter who they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

Ask yourself why you care more now that a Republican is in the WH. Ask yourself why this was a Fusion GPS Project during the election but, was never, ever mentioned until now. Ask yourself how come some blame the Feds for the process of separating children to make sure they are actually related to the person who brought them over a border but, don't seem concerned that human trafficking and convictions are on the rise.

You are correct: it isn't a political issue however, this administration is trying to crack down on sex trafficking, human trafficking etc. I apologize because I know what I am saying offends you. Let me know when you talk to a person who took care of a rented baby separated from "their family".

Makes me sick to my stomach what has been A-Ok. It's like the E. LA Banditos has spread to government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

Ask yourself why you care more now that a Republican is in the WH. Ask yourself why this was a Fusion GPS Project during the election but, was never, ever mentioned until now. Ask yourself how come some blame the Feds for the process of separating children to make sure they are actually related to the person who brought them over a border but, don't seem concerned that human trafficking and convictions are on the rise.

You are correct: it isn't a political issue however, this administration is trying to crack down on sex trafficking, human trafficking etc. I apologize because I know what I am saying offends you. Let me know when you talk to a person who took care of a rented baby separated from "their family".

Makes me sick to my stomach what has been A-Ok. It's like the E. LA Banditos has spread to government.

DP. Have you seen this? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/09/labor-secretary-alexander-acosta-sex-trafficking-budget-cut

Yes, you should apologize. For lying. And this should males us all sick to our stomachs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

Ask yourself why you care more now that a Republican is in the WH. Ask yourself why this was a Fusion GPS Project during the election but, was never, ever mentioned until now. Ask yourself how come some blame the Feds for the process of separating children to make sure they are actually related to the person who brought them over a border but, don't seem concerned that human trafficking and convictions are on the rise.

You are correct: it isn't a political issue however, this administration is trying to crack down on sex trafficking, human trafficking etc. I apologize because I know what I am saying offends you. Let me know when you talk to a person who took care of a rented baby separated from "their family".

Makes me sick to my stomach what has been A-Ok. It's like the E. LA Banditos has spread to government.

DP. Have you seen this? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/09/labor-secretary-alexander-acosta-sex-trafficking-budget-cut

Yes, you should apologize. For lying. And this should males us all sick to our stomachs.

Interesting Freudian slip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bill Clinton 'not telling the truth' about Jeffrey Epstein, says investigative journalist who first revealed allegations in 2010

Investigative journalist Conchita Sarnoff said Monday that former President Bill Clinton isn’t telling the truth when he says he "knows nothing" of the alleged crimes of Jeffrey Epstein.

Sarnoff, who’s the executive director of Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking and the author of her book “TrafficKing,” appeared on Fox News @ Night after an indictment alleging sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy was unsealed Monday morning against Epstein, while Clinton's spokesman issued a statement denying knowledge of Epstein's alleged behavior.

Clinton, meanwhile, said in a statement that he “knows nothing” about the “terrible crimes,” insisting that he took “a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane” in 2002 and 2003 – while his Secret Service detail traveled with him at all times – and that he had only brief meetings with Epstein.

“I know from the pilot logs and these are pilot logs that you know were written by different pilots and at different times that Clinton went, he was a guest of Epstein's 27 times,” she said, adding that “many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him and many times he did not.”

http://www.conchitasarnoff.com/

It's nice to see that Fox News finally has a new reason to talk about the Clintons. Ratings must have been suffering without them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

Ask yourself why you care more now that a Republican is in the WH. Ask yourself why this was a Fusion GPS Project during the election but, was never, ever mentioned until now. Ask yourself how come some blame the Feds for the process of separating children to make sure they are actually related to the person who brought them over a border but, don't seem concerned that human trafficking and convictions are on the rise.

You are correct: it isn't a political issue however, this administration is trying to crack down on sex trafficking, human trafficking etc. I apologize because I know what I am saying offends you. Let me know when you talk to a person who took care of a rented baby separated from "their family".

Makes me sick to my stomach what has been A-Ok. It's like the E. LA Banditos has spread to government.

I don't care more now that a Republican is in office. I have cared about this for years. I actually caught a lot of flack up thread for defending Barr saying, well at least this DOJ is doing something Obama's just sat around and let it lie. The Epstein story has been reported on pretty frequently on and off since 2008. Sorry if you weren't paying attention but the Epstein story was not generated from a 2015 fusion story. Search on google news if you don't believe me.

I am also appalled and disgusted and very outspoken about the completely unrelated but revolting family separation politcy this administration has begun enforcing. AND was mad when the Obama admin was housing children inappropriately (albeit under far less egregious circumstances and conditions than what is happening today).

You can't really offend me because I'm unclear on what point your incoherent post is trying to make.

Bottom line, sex trafficking is bad. Child imprisonment under inhumane conditions is bad. Everyone associated with either should face severe legal repercussions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even removing flight logs (posted by Gawker btw not brietbart) he still was associated with the guy and flew on his plane 4 times. As much a connection as trump. And that's without all the skeevy sh%$ we know for sure about Clinton (just like with trump).

Clinton = Trump. Hes just less of a racist blowhard. But when it comes to mistreating women and being misogynists they are cut from the same cloth.

Then why are the Republicans on here insisting Clinton is guilty of pedophilia and Trump is innocent as the driven snow?

Yeah like I said the liberal partisan bs on this grosses me out just as much as the republican partisan bs.

I think they're both guilty as sin, if not of pedophilia than of benefitting from it while assaulting plenty of women above the age of 18. And anyone making excuses for either of them OR acting like one can only be guilty if they bother is is disgusting.

Lol. I believe you’re the one of the people making this into partisan nonsense. Your response doesn’t answer what the pp said.

How did it not? I am someone who has posted numerous times on this thread that I hope they all go down and that this isn't an R/L issue but a human compassion issue. If you can't say the same that is on your own conscience.

You aren’t reading me right. It’s not liberal partisan bs to note that the rumor that Clinton rose on Epstein’s 20+ times started at Breitbart - so not at a place known for facts. Trump lives next to two of Epstein’s homes, is a self admitted sexual assault we with 20+ claims against him, raped his wife, raped a journalist, slept with two porn stars while married...

If either of these two is guilty, lock them up and throw away the key. If Prince Andrew is guilty, lock him up and throw away the key. But I want all the rapists’ names to come out and I want them all to face justice no matter who they are.

I'm the former Republican above and I completely support your statement. We agree. There may be many names in this that are painful to see. If Jesus Christ himself molested young girls I support a lengthy prison sentence for him and all those who aided and abetted the rapes.