Cops in TX tackle & block desperate parents, while they let shooter rampage thru the school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

I don’t think 18 year olds should be able to buy a gun period but if you clicked on the link you’d see you have to be 21 to apply for financing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

I don’t think 18 year olds should be able to buy a gun period but if you clicked on the link you’d see you have to be 21 to apply for financing.

Ain't that America? It's easier to get an assault weapon than a loan. A banker might lose money on an irresponsible kid, and that would be a travesty.

/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

As someone who lives in one of those communities, we have moral outrage, we are organizing, we are volunteering, we are pressing our local leaders, and we are praying. But people in power and people with money including the media DNGAF. There are many solutions and we've got money for none of them. There are so many guns. There are so many guns that you don't need money to get a gun. It's easier to have a gun than a phone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

I don’t think 18 year olds should be able to buy a gun period but if you clicked on the link you’d see you have to be 21 to apply for financing.

The 21+ thing was to be eligible for the $15k raffle. It doesn't say anything about an age limit on financing.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

I don’t think 18 year olds should be able to buy a gun period but if you clicked on the link you’d see you have to be 21 to apply for financing.

Ain't that America? It's easier to get an assault weapon than a loan. A banker might lose money on an irresponsible kid, and that would be a travesty.

/s

"Ain't that America.. Home o' the shot." Republicans United for More Mass Shootings - Join Us!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They do not care. Republicans only care about the people who have the same beliefs as themselves. So the mayor and school police guy are above reproach. Teachers, kids…F them. These republicans will do anything to undermine the investigation and find someone to blame. This is a reflection of their values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I have to say the Republicans aren't offering a whole lot for our kids at this point.

Look on the bright side. As we were recently reminded in Uvalde and Buffalo, once they turn 18, they're able to walk into a gun store, fill out a few forms, and buy the assault rifle of their dreams.

“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Assault weapons are legal and widely available for legal purchase in gun stores, as was the one used to kill 19 children and two adults in Texas last week, and the one used to kill people in a Buffalo grocery store the week before.

That's the case with many/most mass shooters. They just buy it (their trusty assault weapon) in a gun store. What's the problem?

Buy now pay later financing and targeted advertising
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/the-gunmaker-whose-rifle-was-used-in-uvalde-shooting-reportedly-runs-direct-to-consumer-ads-to-aimed-at-younger-buyers/ar-AAXShae

Do we know he financed it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

I don't think it has been reported in the media anywhere that someone gave the kid $9,000. Stop spreading false rumors. Anyway, the 18 year old had a job. He could have saved up several thousand from that. I don't think he was expected to contribute rent to either his mom or his grandparents. He didn't have a driver's license, so he didn't have a car to spend money on. Plus, the gun company offers generous financing.

You still have to qualify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

Cite please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose

I bet you are rich. If you were not, you would know that nobody is free.

Tell that to the North Koreans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

I don’t think 18 year olds should be able to buy a gun period but if you clicked on the link you’d see you have to be 21 to apply for financing.

Ain't that America? It's easier to get an assault weapon than a loan. A banker might lose money on an irresponsible kid, and that would be a travesty.

/s

So he didn’t finance it idiot. He didn’t qualify

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose

I bet you are rich. If you were not, you would know that nobody is free.

Tell that to the North Koreans.

North Korea is why we have to sacrifice children at the altar of guns?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Kicks the rock out…..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I bet now the lock is going to be determined defective.