Cops in TX tackle & block desperate parents, while they let shooter rampage thru the school

[Anonymous]

I don't understand how the Texas Governor and every from the dogcatcher to the U.S. Senator hasn't called for this idiot to resign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
“Someone” gave the kid $9,000. Go after that person.

Whut ?

Who gave the kid $9,000 ?

Where did he get that money ?

You don't need money when you plan to kill yourself or go to jail for the rest of your life.

"https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-financing
This is who he bought the guns from. Three months free financing. He only had to pay for the bullets."

Yeah, you can finance weapons of war now with no job and no employment and at 18. Great deal.

American exceptionalism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

Wow. Tell that to my 15 year old who somehow wasn't so comforted by statistics. You don't have to go into a school everyday though, so no biggie for you I guess.

Unbelievable how many people are such selfish POS's and they are raising their kids to be exactly the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

Since are are Prof Freedom, can i assume you are ProChoice as well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

Sorry, but isn't doing drugs Freedom of Choice? I don't understand your argument. You want the freedoms YOU want, but want others prosecuted for their freedoms? And are willing to sacrifice your kids to get it?

[Anonymous]

I wish those parents would quit grieving so we can tell them our new and improved timeline of events. #Uvalde police

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose

I bet you are rich. If you were not, you would know that nobody is free.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how the Texas Governor and every from the dogcatcher to the U.S. Senator hasn't called for this idiot to resign?

Don't worry about assault weapons and mass shooters. Our wonderful police agencies will deal with those doggone "criminals."

Back The Blue! These Colors Don't Run! (Except for When They Do.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

Funny, it seems the other 6 billion people in the world who don’t have the “freedom” to buy whatever gun they want whenever they want don’t seem to mind that “restriction.” I can’t believe you literally said you prefer the “freedom” to buy a certain type of gun over the safety of your own children. Sick. You realize we are talking about real people, right? Who died, who will die, who lost loved ones? This isn’t some college philosophy class.

[Anonymous]

I remember seeing a story of a biker who went to the huge bike rally ( Sturgis) during the first year of Covid. They begged people to stay home, but this guys was like, “ I’m ready to die. I will be at peace knowing I lived…” yada yada yada.
Then he got Covid and ended up in the ICU.
He took it all back. He suddenly saw the value of his health.
Pp values freedom over safely, right up until they pulled aside because their child wasn’t with the rest of the kids. They have to remember what their child was wearing that morning, so the body can be identified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I remember seeing a story of a biker who went to the huge bike rally ( Sturgis) during the first year of Covid. They begged people to stay home, but this guys was like, “ I’m ready to die. I will be at peace knowing I lived…” yada yada yada.
Then he got Covid and ended up in the ICU.
He took it all back. He suddenly saw the value of his health.
Pp values freedom over safely, right up until they pulled aside because their child wasn’t with the rest of the kids. They have to remember what their child was wearing that morning, so the body can be identified.

Then he got Covid and ended up in the ICU. He took it all back

Yeah... then he was all "Hep me, Lord Baby Jesus! Hep me, Sweet Lord Jesus!" #Snowflakes

[Anonymous]

When the largest Texas LEO Union is supporting the independent DOJ investigation, you know the Uvalde guys done effed up:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raging men will always find ways to torture and kill people. Hell, look at the countless serial killers. Odd how no one here seems to want to address root causes, like lack of respect for one another, or common sense authority figures like parents. Children are now commonly raised to hate others who don’t agree with them. Entitlement on steroids.

Tell me, do you think all of these causes you list are unique to the US?

Different poster, but no - they aren't common to the U.S., however gun ownership rates are also not consistently tied to higher murder rates. Russia has a very high violent crime rate, but little to no firearms. The root cause IS the issue, but gun availability (the tool used) does make it easier to commit murder.

The real question is freedom vs. safety. I vote for freedom and always will, even at the risk to my kids and myself. That is the price of freedom. Nothing in life that is worth something is risk-free. Amazing how many people still think the opposite. However, if you think the loss of freedom to carry for law-abiding citizens is less important than the safety of a low percentage of the overall population who are murdered randomly in a mass shooting (extremely low percentage) then that is your right to have that opinion and to try to convince others and politicians of that belief. I'd prefer to have government go after the root cause of most gun-related murders (drugs, gangs, crime) than ban or confiscate arms from the rest of us over a small percentage deaths due to glorified mass shootings, the glorification of which urges future acts of a similar nature. Meanwhile, in the rest of the US, a lot more black men were killed in gang/drug related shootings this week with no moral outrage.

There we have it, folks. This dad or mom would rather their 10-year old get his head blown off by an assault rifle, spending his last minutes in a nightmare, than give up their guns.
Our nation is fcked if parents like this one won’t do what it takes to save the lives of their own flesh and blood.