Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The people who were shot are indirectly on trial. The whole trial is about one simple question: “was Rittenhouse in reasonable fear of serious bodily harm from a situation he didn’t directly cause”

And no, simply being there with a rifle was not causing the situation. You may not like him. You may hate his ideology and politics. You may think he’s a trouble maker. But none of that matters because in this country the law is supposed to apply with equal force to all. And the law especially applies to the people society hates most. A lot of lawyers saw much of the video footage and thought it was a text book self defense claim. A lot thought it was worthy of trying him for murder. But I’d encourage everyone to be more open minded about this because there is a really decent chance that Rittenhouse is going to walk out if they court room a free man who exercised his self defense rights.




No, no he wasn't. HE caused it. He was there illegally, crossing state lines essentially with an illegal weapon in the state of Wisconsin.


Can you stop lying?

FBI aerial surveillance video shows never-before-seen actions before Kyle Rittenhouse shot unarmed man
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/11/03/us/kyle-rittenhouse-trial/index.html

CNN) New FBI infrared aerial surveillance video played in Kyle Rittenouse's homicide trial Wednesday provides a unique angle into the final moments before the teenager fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum during the unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last August.

The infrared video, grainy and shot from 8,500 feet overhead, shows Rittenhouse hustling along a sidewalk and passing Rosenbaum, who is positioned next to a cluster of parked cars.

The video shows the two stop and interact, and Rosenbaum, who was unarmed, then begins to run toward Rittenhouse, who is armed with a rifle. Rittenhouse, then 17, runs away from Rosenbaum before the teenager ultimately turns and shoots him four times, the video shows.

In the video, Rittenhouse is moving rapidly along a sidewalk by himself. The sidewalk leads to a parking lot, where Rosenbaum is positioned next to a cluster of parked cars.

Rittenhouse slows down in the video, and there appears to be some kind of exchange, but there is no audio of the moment.

Other videos from witnesses on the ground show that Rittenhouse could be heard yelling "friendly, friendly, friendly" at this point.

"And it does not dissuade Mr. Rosenbaum, correct?" Richards said.

"Correct," Howard responded.

Rittenhouse continued to move in the same direction he was moving previously, and Rosenbaum starts to chase Rittenhouse. Videos taken of the scene from other witnesses show Rosenbaum threw a plastic bag at Rittenhouse but he was otherwise unarmed.

These other videos also show that a different person fired a gunshot in the air seconds before Rittenhouse fatally shot Rosenbaum.



He was yelling friendly, friendly, friendly because he hoping the police or one of his militia buddies would stumble upon the predicament he created and bail him out by intervening and killing Rosenbaum. Not sure why everyone keeps saying he was saying friendly, friendly, if you've never been a soldier in the army how would you even know what he meant by that. That isn't common jargon. He's not holding a barking poodle and trying to let someone know it's not going to bite, he's holding a lethal weapon. That wasn't for Rosenbaum's ears it was for the calvary he was hoping would show up to save him, and not shoot him in the process.

Because he was out of control and brandishing a cop-killing, lethal mass shooting, semi-automatic rifle, and he looks like every other insane psychopathic white kid who goes into an elementary school kindergarten classroom to shoot a bunch of toddlers. He was a threat to everyone in the vicinity that night.

He set out on this mission thinking he had a part to play in keeping people in order, he needs to sue Trump, being an idiot isn't a defense. He has no formal military or professional protection training, he was in shock and stupid, which doesn't matter, shock isn't the same thing as self-defense.

He wigged out, plain and simple, and was hoping someone would help him out of the jam he got himself into and not shoot him in the process.

The dumb thing is Rosenbaum saw an opportunity, suicide by the teen shooter, and now this dummy is on trial for murder and attempted murder, this is why kids and crazy people shouldn't be allowed to play with guns. Also why you just shouldn't try to police other people's actions, people have lost their minds, bad things happen when you don't mind your own business.
,

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Let's face facts, if anyone except a white rightwinger did what Rittenhouse did, conservatives would be screaming that he should be hanged. But because it's a member of their team who did the killing they're cool with it.

Cool with it? They love it; they love the societal instability. They love the element of danger floating in the air.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:[…]
So Kyle went to the riot to kill people; these leftists went with concealed handguns to protect people?

We must have different definitions of what “concealed” means.

And if you don’t like everyday morons walking around with guns all day long, take it up with the illegitimate SC that appears to be close to expanding the right.
Anonymous
I haven't been following this trial, but if this clip is any indication at how things are going, then the prosecution seems to be flailing.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I haven't been following this trial, but if this clip is any indication at how things are going, then the prosecution seems to be flailing.


Did anyone ask for proof that the GOP supports white supremacy vigilantism? Because you very kindly just posted some.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I haven't been following this trial, but if this clip is any indication at how things are going, then the prosecution seems to be flailing.


Did anyone ask for proof that the GOP supports white supremacy vigilantism? Because you very kindly just posted some.


White supremacy vigilantism?

WTF are you talking about? I posted a clip that shows an ill-prepared prosecutor.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I haven't been following this trial, but if this clip is any indication at how things are going, then the prosecution seems to be flailing.


Did anyone ask for proof that the GOP supports white supremacy vigilantism? Because you very kindly just posted some.


White supremacy vigilantism?

WTF are you talking about? I posted a clip that shows an ill-prepared prosecutor.

“WTF” I am talking about is the Kyle Rittenhouse case? The thread you’re on? Are you familiar with this or did you think you were posting somewhere else?

Here, I’ll explain my post again s-l-o-w-e-r and with more detail so you don’t have to make any assumptions.

Kyle Rittenhouse is a rotten little white supremacist who mommy drove him and his gun across state lines so he could create mayhem. It has long been a contention of many Democratic posters on this board that violence and mayhem that Kyle caused is something that the Republican Party supports. You posted what you thought was some great demonstration that the prosecution isn’t doing well, but you posted it from the twitter account of a woman who works in the GOP, thus proving that the GOP supports white supremacist vigilantism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I haven't been following this trial, but if this clip is any indication at how things are going, then the prosecution seems to be flailing.


Did anyone ask for proof that the GOP supports white supremacy vigilantism? Because you very kindly just posted some.


White supremacy vigilantism?

WTF are you talking about? I posted a clip that shows an ill-prepared prosecutor.

“WTF” I am talking about is the Kyle Rittenhouse case? The thread you’re on? Are you familiar with this or did you think you were posting somewhere else?

Here, I’ll explain my post again s-l-o-w-e-r and with more detail so you don’t have to make any assumptions.

Kyle Rittenhouse is a rotten little white supremacist who mommy drove him and his gun across state lines so he could create mayhem. It has long been a contention of many Democratic posters on this board that violence and mayhem that Kyle caused is something that the Republican Party supports. You posted what you thought was some great demonstration that the prosecution isn’t doing well, but you posted it from the twitter account of a woman who works in the GOP, thus proving that the GOP supports white supremacist vigilantism.


OH, FFS. You, my friend, appear to have an anger problem and it is you who is making assumptions.

There is a trial going on. You have stated YOUR OPINION of who Rittenhouse is. There is no proof or even EVIDENCE that he is a white supremacist. NONE.

And, when a prosecutor f's up and does a poor job with a witness, someone posting it proves WHAT exactly?
Anonymous
If Kyle is a white supremacist why did he shoot white people?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If Kyle is a white supremacist why did he shoot white people?

They were politically black.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If Kyle is a white supremacist why did he shoot white people?

You are stupid, very stupid.
Anonymous
Why was he there? He doesn’t live in that state. He brought a gun. Clearly, he came to kill BLM protestors.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why was he there? He doesn’t live in that state. He brought a gun. Clearly, he came to kill BLM protestors.

Motives are questions of fact for the jury to decide. Do you think the prosecution is making the case that these are intentional murders. Or is this just your assumption because of politics. You should be more suspicious of your own thought processes when a criminal case fits your politics than when it doesn't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Kyle is a white supremacist why did he shoot white people?

They were politically black.


That’s racist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Kyle is a white supremacist why did he shoot white people?

They were politically black.


That’s racist.

Exactly.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: