Agreed. That said, many parents who are looking at TJ have kids who are interested in STEM and who are ahead in Math. There is a reason that parents are looking at TJ. I am following the TJ threads because my child might be interested in TJ in a few years. It is helpful for me to understand how the application process is working so I can guide my child as needed. I will admit that I used to think that the kids in RSM and AoPS and other programs were mainly pushy parents but I have a kid who asks for these programs and enjoys them. It wasn't on my radar because I never had that interest as a child and none of my siblings did these types of programs until they were in high school. I can understand parents who have kids who are into STEM and who are ahead in math feeling frustrated with changes to the admissions process given that they changed so drastically so quickly and were not done in a smooth fashion. The meals questions is a great example. It was meant to be a proxy for families who were eligible for FARMs but was written in a way that allowed anyone to check yes. I have no problem with people discussing getting the balance of scoring evened out. I think that the discussion can be good. The level of frustration with how the changes were made and how poorly the transition has been handled. Kids who have worked hard in school and did everything they needed to do to be seen as a strong candidate 2 years ago had the rug pulled out from under their feet. The disappointment is real and understandable. I do think that the criteria needs to include Geometry and that the essays need to be written in person and not at home. I like the idea of the math solution problem but it sounds like it needs to be a more challenging problem and that it needs to be better balanced. |
Do you really think parents on this board don't know how the world works? are you serious? |
If you read bios of various historical figures from the one-room-schoolhouse era, it was common to accelerate kids to whatever level was the best fit. The gifted kids were moving on to college at age 14 because they had already completed all of the high school materials by that point, and because no one was holding them back from learning based on their age. Binding a specific curriculum to specific age and grade levels rather than current achievement level is a much more recent and much more odd way of educating kids. Most people who do AoPS and RSM are not taking these classes to get ahead. They're taking them because their kids were already bored with the public school math curriculum. Most people who do Kumon aren't doing it to get ahead, but rather to correct a deficiency their kids are having. If a kid truly has mastered all of pre-algebra, nothing is gained by having the kid sit around learning nothing in school. |
I won’t believe this until multiple people say it AND it isn’t about a friend; it’s about Their own children. |
PP who mentioned knowing the kid who took BC Calc—if it helps, he went to Basis for a year, then his father moved him back to our base school because he thought it would improve his chances of getting into TJ. |
Yes I think many do. I know personally If I knew networking is the key to getting a job and success I would have done things very differently in high school and college. Again many folks think high test scores and acceleration are the keys to success. There is nothing that is further from the truth. To the posters still pushing back, I hate to break it to you but as a high IQ person myself (and really regardless of that) many things are going to be boring and drudgery. That's life. |
It’s true. I also heard from my child that a kid in her school was changed from accepted to waitlisted. The admission office began to re-evaluate the admission. |
+1000. I think ppl here are just afraid to say it because they are either embarrassed or worried that ppl would start bashing them. |
Which school? |
Try being high IQ and having ADHD! Things are so boring. My husband, whose IQ is lower than mine, is an amazing networker. He makes 5x what I do (and I make a decent amount). He is fantastic as a leader. I’m smarter but I can’t lead and understand people like he does. I was in my school’s version on AAP, got great grades, etc. and it has not meant more financial success than my networker husband. I’d rather be smart than not, but having people skills is worth so much more. |
Thank you for the wisdom from a high IQ person! Yes, let's cancel math/English/science/social studies classes and just have networking school. None of those things matter anyway. And let's not try to overcome boredom, but just accept it as an inevitable part of life. |
Clearly you’re not IQ based on your mischaracterization of my response, but it’s ok, your kids can make up for their lack of innate intelligence with extra work. |
^^ high IQ |
People would say it on an a private forum. Is there anyone on this forum whose own child lost a spot? I’m guessing it’s not. No one did. And don’t troll and lie. |
Boredom is necessary. It is where creativity thrives. |