How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like her.

Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.

An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*

Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like her.

I don't like her.

Oh well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like her.

Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.

An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*

Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.

John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.

This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I understand being concerned for the future of Roe v. Wade and for those in other states but Scalia, an originalist, said that abortion was a matter to be left to the states. Terrifying women who live in Blue states that they should be transferring embryos to Canada or stockpiling birth control pills puts you in the category of the hysterical. Unless you think that the governments of DC, Virginia or Maryland are likely to be a very conservative red sometime soon, outlawing IVF, contraception, or abortion are not likely around here. But ymmv.

Oh please we all know she wants to do away with Roe vs Wade that is what her job is period. Well beside pardoning Trump and giving him the election.

Two things.
1. Clearly she is not qualified today she could not answer simple questions about the constitution. Yet her white notebook was empty.
2. Her non disclosures are not mistakes. She claims she is fastidious at work well then why didn't she turn in the appropriate paperwork???

We "libs" know exactly who she is. And for a job interview lifetime appointment she isn't a good fit. And I personally would be ok with a conservative just not her! She is Typhoid Mary. If she can not stand up for her children and wear a simple mask in public ie Rose Garden then no she's not qualified! She spread the virus to her kids school. She's a great human as well. NO!

ACB to you:

Apparently your fundie cult doesn’t let you see movies! This character was an immoral bitch....Freudian slip?

Why am I not surprised at your complete lack of any sense of humor? You must be fun at parties.
DP

[Anonymous]

I am an educator, and the Constitution is written at an elementary school level. If a 5th grader can understand it, a lawyer must be able to do so.

The U.S. Constitution is written at a 17.8 grade level according to the Flesch-Kincaid test.

You either have not read the constitution recently or are not much of an educator. Or you teach a group of fifth graders who are on the verge of earning master's degrees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I understand being concerned for the future of Roe v. Wade and for those in other states but Scalia, an originalist, said that abortion was a matter to be left to the states. Terrifying women who live in Blue states that they should be transferring embryos to Canada or stockpiling birth control pills puts you in the category of the hysterical. Unless you think that the governments of DC, Virginia or Maryland are likely to be a very conservative red sometime soon, outlawing IVF, contraception, or abortion are not likely around here. But ymmv.

Oh please we all know she wants to do away with Roe vs Wade that is what her job is period. Well beside pardoning Trump and giving him the election.

Two things.
1. Clearly she is not qualified today she could not answer simple questions about the constitution. Yet her white notebook was empty.
2. Her non disclosures are not mistakes. She claims she is fastidious at work well then why didn't she turn in the appropriate paperwork???

We "libs" know exactly who she is. And for a job interview lifetime appointment she isn't a good fit. And I personally would be ok with a conservative just not her! She is Typhoid Mary. If she can not stand up for her children and wear a simple mask in public ie Rose Garden then no she's not qualified! She spread the virus to her kids school. She's a great human as well. NO!

ACB to you:

Apparently your fundie cult doesn’t let you see movies! This character was an immoral bitch....Freudian slip?

Why am I not surprised at your complete lack of any sense of humor? You must be fun at parties.

I’m sure you are going to a lot of COVID super-spreader parties....
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are going to see her get bi-partisan support. Slam dunk.

Which Democrat is going to vote for her?

She will get about 20 Dems. Feinstein has given them a lot of cover. It just goes to show the Democrats talk a good game but the only action they take is to ask for more money. As soon as they win the senate they will run away from anything progressive while asking for more money to fight the republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are going to see her get bi-partisan support. Slam dunk.

Which Democrat is going to vote for her?

She will get about 20 Dems. Feinstein has given them a lot of cover. It just goes to show the Democrats talk a good game but the only action they take is to ask for more money. As soon as they win the senate they will run away from anything progressive while asking for more money to fight the republicans.

Even Manchin said he would not vote for her. Nice try, tho.

[Anonymous]

TWENTY DEMS!!!!!

So 20 out of 47. Okay.

🙄

[Anonymous]

Not that she cares about the law, but...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Not that she cares about the law, but...

The only reason she is there is to help trump. Trump does not like his people recusing themselves...Former AG sessions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not that she cares about the law, but...

The only reason she is there is to help trump. Trump does not like his people recusing themselves...Former AG sessions.

Once she’s on, she’s on.

[Anonymous]

And...this is what happens when you rush a confirmation.

Any ACB supporters want to defend this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And...this is what happens when you rush a confirmation.

Any ACB supporters want to defend this?

Well before I even read further, let’s just note the source:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternet/
LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternet/

Controversies

AlterNet has been given a mixed rating by Snopes.com fact checks, and was included in an initial index of "unreliable" news websites crafted by numerous media scientists and fact-checking groups.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/alternet-media-bias

[Anonymous]

So, no, the cult 45ists won’t defend it, b/c they don’t care about any life except the unborn, preferably white ones. Black women being abuse while pregnant in prison, and then giving birth in shackles, is their favorite torture porn.