Boundary Review Meetings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I literally can not wait to sit on tonight's meeting and hear how they are going to explain themselves.

I was thinking the same thing but the most important thing for tonight is that the Robinson and Centreville parents get to focus on whatever Scenario 4 means for them. The rest of us will see the maps before our meetings. The first group up got totally screwed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally can not wait to sit on tonight's meeting and hear how they are going to explain themselves.

I was thinking the same thing but the most important thing for tonight is that the Robinson and Centreville parents get to focus on whatever Scenario 4 means for them. The rest of us will see the maps before our meetings. The first group up got totally screwed.

Are you sure about that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just got a non-answer to my email to my SB member. “Technical issues”, link to map page when they’re available, blah, blah, blah.

Why are they unable to post a
pdf file with maps if they are incompetent technically?

Right? At least for today's pyramid. Anything, pdf, screenshot, verbal summary.

[Anonymous]

Hold onto those feelings of frustration when it comes time for the next School Board elections in 2027. Reid may have hired Thru, but the School Board hired Reid. The incompetence and disregard for families starts with the School Board and flows downhill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally can not wait to sit on tonight's meeting and hear how they are going to explain themselves.

I was thinking the same thing but the most important thing for tonight is that the Robinson and Centreville parents get to focus on whatever Scenario 4 means for them. The rest of us will see the maps before our meetings. The first group up got totally screwed.

Are you sure about that?

I’m not sure FCPS will get their act together. I’m more sure that whatever shows up at tonight’s meeting will get distributed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally can not wait to sit on tonight's meeting and hear how they are going to explain themselves.

I was thinking the same thing but the most important thing for tonight is that the Robinson and Centreville parents get to focus on whatever Scenario 4 means for them. The rest of us will see the maps before our meetings. The first group up got totally screwed.

Are you sure about that?

I’m not sure FCPS will get their act together. I’m more sure that whatever shows up at tonight’s meeting will get distributed.

I have no confidence the maps will be released today. Something must be very wrong with them. I could see them canceling that meeting with very little notice.

[Anonymous]

Have the FairFacts BRAC people spilled any tea on the new maps. They’re usually good at vague posting within the constraints of the NDA while also highlighting major issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally can not wait to sit on tonight's meeting and hear how they are going to explain themselves.

I was thinking the same thing but the most important thing for tonight is that the Robinson and Centreville parents get to focus on whatever Scenario 4 means for them. The rest of us will see the maps before our meetings. The first group up got totally screwed.

Are you sure about that?

I’m not sure FCPS will get their act together. I’m more sure that whatever shows up at tonight’s meeting will get distributed.

I have no confidence the maps will be released today. Something must be very wrong with them. I could see them canceling that meeting with very little notice.

Just read Reid's October 13 Weekly Reflections. Usual stuff. Nothing about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have the FairFacts BRAC people spilled any tea on the new maps. They’re usually good at vague posting within the constraints of the NDA while also highlighting major issues.

This should be exempt from the NDA. It is well past the scheduled Oct 10 release date.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have the FairFacts BRAC people spilled any tea on the new maps. They’re usually good at vague posting within the constraints of the NDA while also highlighting major issues.

Nope. Nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the FairFacts BRAC people spilled any tea on the new maps. They’re usually good at vague posting within the constraints of the NDA while also highlighting major issues.

Nope. Nothing.

Are we sure they saw the maps? Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see any remarks on the FB page indicating as such.

[Anonymous]

Going on T-minus 6 hours here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the FairFacts BRAC people spilled any tea on the new maps. They’re usually good at vague posting within the constraints of the NDA while also highlighting major issues.

Nope. Nothing.

Are we sure they saw the maps? Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see any remarks on the FB page indicating as such.

They have seen the maps. Confirmed on NextDoor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the FairFacts BRAC people spilled any tea on the new maps. They’re usually good at vague posting within the constraints of the NDA while also highlighting major issues.

Nope. Nothing.

Are we sure they saw the maps? Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see any remarks on the FB page indicating as such.

They saw the maps on Sat night...not the boundary tool. Apparently they were confusing to read.

[Anonymous]

Ok, so we at least know the maps exist then. That rules out someone at THRU deleting the master file type of technical glitch.