So what kind of King will Charles be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

Harry and William were right. He shouldn’t have married her.

Many would say the same about Harry's wife.

+1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

So what? She could have said no and the BRF would have moved on to the next eligible blue blood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

If Diana wanted to be Queen, she would have stayed married. The reason I respect her is that she chose to live the life that was right for her, and walked away from the monarchy. Unlike her son and wife, who chose their lives but didn't walk away -- instead choosing to do Netflix specials and sell books trashing their family.

[Anonymous]

If she had just bothered to wear a seatbelt, she would be living an amazing life with Dodi (or the like), her sons, and grandchildren.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

If Diana wanted to be Queen, she would have stayed married. The reason I respect her is that she chose to live the life that was right for her, and walked away from the monarchy. Unlike her son and wife, who chose their lives but didn't walk away -- instead choosing to do Netflix specials and sell books trashing their family.

Both Charles and Diana wrote or participating in the writing of books that trashed their family. Netflix wasn't around, but Diana did a tell-all BBC interview. You're obviously no fan of history or the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

So what? She could have said no and the BRF would have moved on to the next eligible blue blood.

She was 19 and very innocent. Perhaps she thought she was in love?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Dp Either way to you whatever Charles does is "wrong" Invite them or not you would always blame him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Dp Either way to you whatever Charles does is "wrong" Invite them or not you would always blame him.

Remember when Charles asked Harry to vacate the lease on Frogmore cottage so that his pedo brother could move in? Seems like a great father/son dynamic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she had just bothered to wear a seatbelt, she would be living an amazing life with Dodi (or the like), her sons, and grandchildren.

Wasn't he a coke head? So I don't think it would have ended happily. If the paps hadn't chased her and her driver not been drunk...see too many what ifs...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Dp Either way to you whatever Charles does is "wrong" Invite them or not you would always blame him.

Remember when Charles asked Harry to vacate the lease on Frogmore cottage so that his pedo brother could move in? Seems like a great father/son dynamic

So? Like it or not Prince Andrew has not been convicted and for him, the Frogmore cottage was a big step down.

But you hate Charles so you are very biased.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Dp Either way to you whatever Charles does is "wrong" Invite them or not you would always blame him.

Remember when Charles asked Harry to vacate the lease on Frogmore cottage so that his pedo brother could move in? Seems like a great father/son dynamic

Forgot to add, Harry wanted to be out. You can't be half in and half out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Could say the same about his son.