So what kind of King will Charles be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.

Amen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.

With all due respect to Diana, she’s been dead for 25 years and even if she hadn’t died in the car accident she wouldn’t be Queen because she and Charles were divorced.

We will never know what could have happened if Camilla wasn’t in the picture.

I think it’s obvious that she and Charles were quite mismatched. If it hadn’t been Camilla, it would have been something or someone else (for both of them). I am a Diana fan but can admit she suffered from mental illness as a result of an unstable childhood, which would have made a stable marriage with Charles, or anyone, impossible.

Both Charles and Diana had unhappy childhood and personality issues AND they were decades apart in age with little in common. It was an arranged marriage of necessity for both, not a love connection. She was just into it for princess fantasy and he was a prisoner of crown. I don't have sympathy for either as they were adults, could've said no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.

Why? They were divorced, if not Camilla, it would be someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.

With all due respect to Diana, she’s been dead for 25 years and even if she hadn’t died in the car accident she wouldn’t be Queen because she and Charles were divorced.

We will never know what could have happened if Camilla wasn’t in the picture.

Like if she wasn’t born? Come on, Charles and Diana weren’t in love with each other, it was an arranged marriage. They each deserved better and it’s tragic that Diana didn’t get her chance to grow old with someone she loved and loved her for her. Camilla certainly earned people’s distaste for her, but it seems pretty obvious that she and Charles are the loves of each other’s lives.

Wasn't she crazy for some Indian physician who didn't want to get sucked into her life's drama.

[Anonymous]

Most people doesn't like Camilla because she is the other woman and not 1/8th as charming as Diana.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people doesn't like Camilla because she is the other woman and not 1/8th as charming as Diana.

Diana is long dead. You are using present tense like they are currently rivals.

[Anonymous]

who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

Harry and William were right. He shouldn’t have married her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

[Anonymous]

A queen is someone who is married to a king at the time of coronation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

Diana’s been gone for a quarter century. An entire generation knows her only by name. And history is usually written by the living.

[Anonymous]

Obvious she was employed and living on her own so could've said no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

Harry and William were right. He shouldn’t have married her.

Many would say the same about Harry's wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obvious she was employed and living on her own so could've said no.

Nobody put a gun to her head. She could have lived a quiet life married to someone else.