|
New ATL rankings have Duke, UVA & Cornell 1-3. Yale 15, Harvard 16 and Stanford 27. đł
There is an analysis of why, but even ATL seems a bit mystified, since Yale and Harvard have always topped these rankings. The results are based on outcomes â jobs and employment (and before someone makes this argument, yes, they do account for low-paying prestige jobs like clerkships). In any case, it provides an interesting data point for those arguing that professional outcomes are better from the Ivies. https://abovethelaw.com/2022/06/5-takeaways-from-the-2022-law-school-rankings/?utm_campaign=Above%20the%20Law%20Daily&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=216133768&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_VR5Dt2naFSpoRtaHW60JUaFvT_kkPR5ZlsVYth5jfcr4ZV_Cr1H3aV9LVzpHhv7uGY34PCUVWLr7rRyslChej0jFqCA&utm_content=216133768&utm_source=hs_email |
| Lol! I donât think so. |
| So much for the ATL rankings.. |
This is the kind of reasoned, logical argument weâve come to expect from Ivy law grads. I think we can see why they arenât doing well in the job market. |
|
This is an interesting analysis:
The ATL Top 50 ranking isnât trying to emulate other rankings out there. As opposed to privileging a law schoolâs âinputsâ â GPAs and LSAT scores â we put our thumb on the schoolâs outputs and reward schools offering students the best return on investment. So Yale might be a better law school in the abstract, but that doesnât mean itâs giving you the best bang for your educational buck compared to another traditional âT14â school like Duke. But hereâs the thing⌠Yale and Harvard and Stanford used to top our ranking too. The initial ATL Top 50 ranking placed the HYS triad in the top three places. The methodology hasnât really changed over that run, so how did we get here? It appears to be a combination of schools upping their job placement game and the vagaries of cost of living. Taking an isolated comparison, Dukeâs all-in cost of attendance is $337,238 per Law School Transparency, Stanford is going to run someone $383,937. Meanwhile, Duke has a 93.6 percent employment score and a 2.4 percent underemployment score while Stanford has an 82.6 percent employment score and a 12 percent underemployment score. This trend is more interesting to me than the 2022 snapshot. The ATL methodology isnât intentionally detrimental to the HYS schools⌠but from the start of the rankings until today those schools have made choices that dragged them from the podium. That says something about the philosophy guiding the schools right now. |
| Maybe HYS grads are just turning away from soul-crushing stints in Big Law and going on to get PhDs (needed to become a professor at top law schools - most of whom have JDs from HYS) or going in house right away at tech start ups that offered greater deferred compensation. In any event, COVID-times make the job numbers everywhere wonky. |
I think that's more like it. A Harvard Law grad will either be much pickier about their jobs, and/or want a career in research or education that does not come with a large salary. I don't think Obama made that much money before becoming President
|
| Can someone post the rankings? |
No. His wife also worked briefly, dipped feet in healthcare and U Chicagoâs programs and then stayed home to support his career. They werenât in it for money but worked out well in the end and they made lots of money after young retirement |
| Everyone is figuring out that Ivies and their professional schools are good but no super special compared to other schools in same tier. |
+1 AND cost |
| Considering the recent idiocy of YLS students, I'm not particularly surprised. Who would want to hire these twits? |
Which explains why the non-Ivy suffered the most precipitous fall? |
| Can someone post the top 10- I do not have an ATL account and do not want to do so and get sucked into its vortex đ. |
| I didnât even know Duke had a law schoolâŚbut ok. |