"pulling the rape card," really??? and LOL at a pro-lifer claiming to be better informed and more honest about statistics. we talk about rape because it's one horrific scenario that happens repeatedly, requiring abortion -- and you want to force them to have the babies. and you think you're making some kind of great gotcha point that most abortions are not due to rape? god, you're dumb. and malevolent. what a horrible combo. |
Yes, sometimes's is other driver's fault. But you know this and accept it going in. But you can choose not to drive. You can make other arrangements. There are fatal and disabling car accidents. Those are the ones that matter. Getting a payout is a small consolation if you are dead or in wheelchair. Most cars are manufacturer tested under more rigorous circumstances than accidents. Only after they have passed rigorous tests cars (and other machines/tools) are released to market. Overwhelming majority of cars don't randomly combust or cause accidents. It is not manufacturer's fault that you haven't read the manual and test driven the car to know how to properly use breaks, signal, etc. It's people not taking personal responsibility that cause accidents (small percentages caused by natural disasters are exempt from this discussion). |
you keep on making this argument. "punish the irresponsible womem by making them have babies" is never going to be a winner for you. so go ahead, keep at it. |
so all men need to get mandatory vasectomies at 15 because their sperm causes accidental pregnancy. got it. ps your stupid-ass metaphor doesn't work. no-fault insurance exists for a reason. |
| I'm not going to skip work because I am afraid I might get in a car accident. I accept the risk and deal with the consequences. If my car is broken, I repair it. And like the pp said, no fault insurance exists for this reason. |
Right. But we are only debating fatal and disabling car accidents caused by the lack of personal responsibility. |
| Pro-lifers can carry on with their nonsense, but abortion will always be available to the rich and middle class. Just a fact. Deal with it. |
| It all really boils down to those religious fanatics who believe abortion is wrong in all or almost all circumstances and those who do not. Those opposed want to impose their beliefs on others through the legal system. These Catholics and Evangelicals are the new Puritans who want this country to be a theocracy. And, by the way, look at what happened in Ireland which had largely been a theocracy and voters overwhelmingly overturned the criminalization of abortion. |
I'm embarrassed for you sticking doggedly to that loser of a metaphor. Pro tip: people don't lose fundamental civil rights because a subset of people think their behavior is irresponsible. It's a bad argument, legally, ethically, and in the real-world context of how people live their lives. |
+1 Stupid argument |
| No female age 18 or under should ever be forced to have a baby. I know as I was raped and parents pulled "innocent baby" crap. What about their innocent daughter? I had the bastard, put it out for adoption, left home and never spoke to parents again. |
I agree with this. Recent elections have swung some state so far to the right, so that when RvW gets challenged again at the SCOTUS level it may devolve into a state level decision. States like Nevada, Vermont, California, New York etc. will codify women’s reproductive freedom into their state’s constitutions, and ending the argument; while states like Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri etc. will codify pro life language into their state constitutions, ending the right to abortion there. |
You “prolifers”are really in a bind because either you have to say that you view conceptions made via rape as less worthy human potential than conceptions made through consensual sex, so you’re okay with aborting them (without resorting to the language of murder and innocent babies) - in other words you only truly care about the mode of conception and whether it meets your moral standards. Or else you have to be rigid and say no exceptions at all, thus putting yourselves in the uncomfortable and hugely unpopular position of forcing a 12 year old baby to give birth. Which most people would say only a monster would do. Doesn’t matter how few 12 year olds get pregnant a year, forcing a single 12 year old baby to go through pregnancy is monstrous. |
|
Forcing any women to do something against her will is monsterous.
|
Those are stats from a very flawed, very limited, decades-old Guttmacher study. However if you insist on using it then how about including one of their other key findings from that study, that 46% of abortions were due to not having contraception. Now, correlate that with the 42% reduction in abortions in Colorado as a function of providing free contraceptives. How about getting on board with providing free contraceptives to anyone who needs them? That alone would have far better results where it comes to significantly reducing abortions than the idiocy and criminalization that the pro-lifers are trying to push. Plus, it's fiscally responsible. The Guttmacher study found that a large percentage of abortions were because the mother could not afford to have children. That means WIC, likely food stamps, rent subsidies and other supports at great taxpayer expense that would be avoided. Or the cost of giving the child up, which likely means putting the child into foster care because the reality of it is that there are nowhere near enough families adopting. The cost of providing contraceptives for free is significantly lower than all of those social safety net services that would have to be provided. Any fiscal conservative should be wholly on board with it. Free contraceptives. That is your best plan. |