Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hes going to be appointed to the bench on Friday, you democrats are delusional if you think the majority of the public are going along with a political hitjob like this - especially when none of the accusers have no proof at all, and Ford [who is NOT credible] doesnt even remember the location the date or the time...its a sick joke really, a innocent man has had his life practically destroyed just so that the Democrats can try and keep him [a conservative] off of the Supreme Court.

This. And I'm not even a conservative. But I think what's been done to him is atrocious and pathetic.

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

With the possible exception of Ford, the "alleged" victims don't have my sympathies because I think they're completely unbelievable and seem to have conveniently come out of the woodwork at an opportune time.

Read up on Ford. She is the shadiest of all of them, her own story doesnt match what she said in 2012, and she has political motivations to harm Kavanaugh. She is a activist Democrat who goes to anti trump protests and has penned letters ranting about trump's border policies from what little we do know of her....she wiped her twitter and facebook account so that nobody can what type of person she really is, and most likely she is a huge anti trumper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Facts...
*ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh from ANY of the accusers. ZERO. NONE.
*Ford's own 4 witnesses say they dont remember any party ever happening
*Ford cant even remember the location the date or the time of the supposed party
*She said she was afraid to fly and that delayed her testifying for a full week...then when questioned on Thursday at DC - she said she flew there!! Wow.
*She changed her original story in 2012 from 4 guys down to 2 guys a few months ago
*Her main witness Keyser has retained a lawyer and admantly denies any party ever happening, completely contradicting Ford

*The other accusers are just as bad.
*And one of the accusers is under criminal investigation by the FBI for completely making up a claim about Kavanaugh raping a woman on a boat...How much lower can the Democrats go [who knows they are rock bottom already]

It makes you look bad when you c&p stuff that is outdated info from some raving site. If this was your own work, don't quit your day job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Facts...
*ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh from ANY of the accusers. ZERO. NONE.
*Ford's own 4 witnesses say they dont remember any party ever happening
*Ford cant even remember the location the date or the time of the supposed party
*She said she was afraid to fly and that delayed her testifying for a full week...then when questioned on Thursday at DC - she said she flew there!! Wow.
*She changed her original story in 2012 from 4 guys down to 2 guys a few months ago
*Her main witness Keyser has retained a lawyer and admantly denies any party ever happening, completely contradicting Ford

*The other accusers are just as bad.
*And one of the accusers is under criminal investigation by the FBI for completely making up a claim about Kavanaugh raping a woman on a boat...How much lower can the Democrats go [who knows they are rock bottom already]

It makes you look bad when you c&p stuff that is outdated info from some raving site. If this was your own work, don't quit your day job.

Those are all facts, complete facts. Unlike you i actually have good morals and decency and believe in facts and innocent until proven guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Facts...
*ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh from ANY of the accusers. ZERO. NONE.
*Ford's own 4 witnesses say they dont remember any party ever happening
*Ford cant even remember the location the date or the time of the supposed party
*She said she was afraid to fly and that delayed her testifying for a full week...then when questioned on Thursday at DC - she said she flew there!! Wow.
*She changed her original story in 2012 from 4 guys down to 2 guys a few months ago
*Her main witness Keyser has retained a lawyer and admantly denies any party ever happening, completely contradicting Ford

*The other accusers are just as bad.
*And one of the accusers is under criminal investigation by the FBI for completely making up a claim about Kavanaugh raping a woman on a boat...How much lower can the Democrats go [who knows they are rock bottom already]

It makes you look bad when you c&p stuff that is outdated info from some raving site. If this was your own work, don't quit your day job.

^^^If this is what's meant by the B team, then I agree. When you have no rebuttal, stick to insulting posters. Makes you look SO credible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Facts...
*ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh from ANY of the accusers. ZERO. NONE.
*Ford's own 4 witnesses say they dont remember any party ever happening
*Ford cant even remember the location the date or the time of the supposed party
*She said she was afraid to fly and that delayed her testifying for a full week...then when questioned on Thursday at DC - she said she flew there!! Wow.
*She changed her original story in 2012 from 4 guys down to 2 guys a few months ago
*Her main witness Keyser has retained a lawyer and admantly denies any party ever happening, completely contradicting Ford

*The other accusers are just as bad.
*And one of the accusers is under criminal investigation by the FBI for completely making up a claim about Kavanaugh raping a woman on a boat...How much lower can the Democrats go [who knows they are rock bottom already]

It makes you look bad when you c&p stuff that is outdated info from some raving site. If this was your own work, don't quit your day job.

Those are all facts, complete facts. Unlike you i actually have good morals and decency and believe in facts and innocent until proven guilty.

Do you believe in perjury?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

With the possible exception of Ford, the "alleged" victims don't have my sympathies because I think they're completely unbelievable and seem to have conveniently come out of the woodwork at an opportune time.

You don't think Ramirez is believable after it's been revealed that Kavanaugh sought to pre-emptively bury her story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.

She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.

Children should be off limits, which includes being misleading about how children are depicted in cartoons. The child was not targeted and you are attempting to exploit the child to generate outrage. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I think about this.... when his girls get a little older and google information about themselves, this will certainly be returned in the search results.
It is horrible.

The child IS being targeted. She is being used by the cartoonist putting words in her mouth that suggest she believes those awful things are true about her own father. I don't know how anyone could attempt to justify that hideous behavior. Imagine how she'll feel the day she sees that. It won't be as far off as when she's old enough to find it on her own. How long will it be before it is shown to her by a classmate taunting her with it? It will be used in a second way to target her.

Most people posting here either won't admit it or don't care at all.

Yup. I'd say I was surprised, but I'm not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

With the possible exception of Ford, the "alleged" victims don't have my sympathies because I think they're completely unbelievable and seem to have conveniently come out of the woodwork at an opportune time.

You don't think Ramirez is believable after it's been revealed that Kavanaugh sought to pre-emptively bury her story?

She was calling college friends of hers from that time period and asking them if they remembered a party with kavanaugh, and if it even was Kavanaugh. Mmmm thats not credible at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the Mitchell memo. No one is asking for charges to be brought. No one is contending that she met the reasonable doubt standard.

The report just makes me more sympathetic to Ford. She is being criticized and torn apart and now a prosecutor has torn through and prepared a report for nothing. And there is no report on Kavanaugh. And we all saw his performance and know where the inconsistencies are. Not to mention his conduct.

How bizarre.

I think the point is that these allegations simply cannot be proven. While this isn’t a court of law, there has to be *something* to pin on Kavanaugh, and there just isn’t. And Ford hasn’t been “criticized and torn apart.” Please. Quite the opposite. She’s being hailed as some kind of “folk hero” for bringing forward decades old allegations that could have been resolved - you guessed it - decades ago. Without ruining someone else’s life and family in the process.

One can reasonably conclude Ford perjured herself after reading prosecutor Rachel Mitchell's report. After this farce is all over, the senate should seriously consider refer Ford to a criminal investigation.

Get a grip.

Did you read Mitchell's report?

Mitchell's report was detailed, and absolutely devastating to Ford. Which is why the narrative is now focusing on groupspeak re: women/assault as well as Kavanaugh's drinking. The new narrative is designed to create a tale in which Kavanaugh was blackout drunk and didn't remember assaulting her, so Ford should be believed.

In fact, Mitchell's report shows Ford story has no credibility INDEPENDENT OF KAVANAUGH.

Keep up, no one cares about Mitchell, she has proven to be a hack. Swetnick filed a report AT THE TIME OF HER ASSAULT.

Kavanaugh is done.

Oh, this is rich. "No one cares about Mitchell," you mean because her opinion didn't go your way? Waah! Tantrum!!

She's an extremely well-thought of sexual crimes prosecutor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Therapist notes? Are they privileged?

Yes.

Even at a criminal trial? Defense couldn’t ask about the method of memory recovery? Dr Ford’s testimony is so old alraedy, it seems. On to ice. Throwing, that is. Feiler faster.

Once she shared the notes with the WaPo, legal privilege disappeared.