Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett lies again:

When asked, Kavanaugh told committee staff Sept. 25th he was “probably” at a wedding with Ramirez. “I am sure I saw her because it wasn’t a huge wedding,” but “doesn’t have a specific recollection.” Texts show his team had the photo, from a friend, at least since Sept. 22

https://twitter.com/DafnaLinzer/status/1046969030681276417

Wow - think he even lasts until Friday? They need all of the time they can get to get someone else in before mid-terms.

I don't think they can get someone confirmed before mid-terms, we're at just 36 days out, but they could try to hustle somebody in before January when the new Congress is sworn in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

[Anonymous]

Hes going to be appointed to the bench on Friday, you democrats are delusional if you think the majority of the public are going along with a political hitjob like this - especially when none of the accusers have no proof at all, and Ford [who is NOT credible] doesnt even remember the location the date or the time...its a sick joke really, a innocent man has had his life practically destroyed just so that the Democrats can try and keep him [a conservative] off of the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

Burden of proof is on the accusers, they have no proof and ruined a man's life intentionally, so they deserve no sympathy at all.

[Anonymous]

It’s not the deed it’s the cover-up. That’s what always gets people in Washington. Look at every presidential scandal since Watergate.

[Anonymous]

There is police record after all -

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/us/politics/kavanaugh-bar-fight.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Julie Swetnick just said on MSNBC that she filed a report with the Montgomery County Police after her assault. The police say it will take a month fo find the report. Perhaps the FBI can speed things up?

I just saw a clip of her interview on NBC Nightly News. She does not come across as remotely believable. The excerpt pointed out that of the four people she provided as witnesses who could back up her claims, one said he didn't recall anyone named Julie Swetnick, the other friend is dead, and the other 2 have not responded.

This is why the contemporaneous report is important. I don't know if it names anyone, but it would obviously add to her credibility.

I agree. Same goes for Ford. There is nothing to add to her credibility so far.

Okay if you think ford was not credible then I trust your opinion about Swetnick's credibility even less then I would trust Brett Kavanaugh to not put Rohypnol in a girl's drink. Which is to say, not at all.

Her story was deemed not credible by a prosecutor who specializes in the field.

False. She never said Ford wasn’t credible. Nor did she even finish questioning Kavanaugh.

Oh, please. She lays it all out in painstaking detail. It's just not the outcome you wanted.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gop-hired-prosecutor-rachel-mitchell-questions-credibility-of-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you defending Kavanaugh, is this the message you want to give your kids, drink, be belligerent, lie and one day, you too can be a supreme court justice?

They already taught their kids that if you grab 'em by the p*ssy you could become POTUS some day.

Yup. And truth, kindness, and the law are for losers.

The law I'm teaching my kids is that we are all innocent until proven guilty. It's such a shame your kids won't be taught that concept.

You should probably just stick with "keep your hands to yourself" - if his mom had taught him that, he wouldn't be in this mess.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

Burden of proof is on the accusers, they have no proof and ruined a man's life intentionally, so they deserve no sympathy at all.

Why do you believe him -- a man who openly perjured himself -- over a few different women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh is not on trial. Would anyone here honestly hire the man who ranted and raved and sobbed and lied about his yearbook entries at Thursday's Congressional hearing?
If you watched the full hearing and can still say, yes, then I'd be interested in your reasoning.

Yes. The man we saw on Thursday was entirely human and reacting as anyone would to false allegations of sexual assault. He was not acting. He was REacting to the extremely unjust way in which this has all come about. Had Blasey Ford made her allegations sooner - years sooner, for instance - this could all have been resolved for better or worse, without the media circus and the complete ruin of Kavanaugh and his family.

Even though Ford didn't present her allegations until July, Feinstein should have told her that she needed to share this information with Republicans in order to start an immediate investigation. If Ford wanted to remain anonymous, she could have while the investigation was ongoing. This could all have been settled by now. But instead, Feinstein chose to sit on this information until it was clear Kavanaugh would probably be confirmed. ONLY THEN did the information "leak out" and become public. It was truly a Hail Mary and anyone denying that needs their head examined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adios to Kavanaugh's Harvard teaching gig...

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will not return to Harvard Law School to teach a course that he was previously scheduled to teach in the winter 2019 term.

Harvard Associate Dean Catherine Claypoole wrote in an email to Harvard Law students on Monday evening that the school will not offer the course because Kavanaugh can "no longer commit" to teaching it.


"Today, Judge Kavanaugh indicated that he can no longer commit to teaching his course in January Term 2019, so the course will not be offered," Claypoole wrote, according to the Harvard Crimson.

Kavanaugh was slated to teach a course called "The Supreme Court since 2005."

A group of Harvard Law School students had previously urged the school to stop allowing Kavanaugh to teach there until there was an investigation into accusations of sexual assault made against him.

"Will Harvard Law School take seriously the credible allegation of Kavanaugh’s sexual assault against a young woman before he is allowed to continue teaching young women?" Molly Coleman, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Jake Meiseles and Sejal Singh wrote in The Harvard Law Record. "Or will Harvard allow him to teach students without further inquiry?"

Yeah, his life hasn't been ruined AT ALL. SMH.

Whatever. If three women accused a teacher of assaulting, any school, whether it's an elementary public school or Harvard would want them out. Where's your sympathy for his alleged victims?

With the possible exception of Ford, the "alleged" victims don't have my sympathies because I think they're completely unbelievable and seem to have conveniently come out of the woodwork at an opportune time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hes going to be appointed to the bench on Friday, you democrats are delusional if you think the majority of the public are going along with a political hitjob like this - especially when none of the accusers have no proof at all, and Ford [who is NOT credible] doesnt even remember the location the date or the time...its a sick joke really, a innocent man has had his life practically destroyed just so that the Democrats can try and keep him [a conservative] off of the Supreme Court.

This. And I'm not even a conservative. But I think what's been done to him is atrocious and pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Facts...
*ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh from ANY of the accusers. ZERO. NONE.
*Ford's own 4 witnesses say they dont remember any party ever happening
*Ford cant even remember the location the date or the time of the supposed party
*She said she was afraid to fly and that delayed her testifying for a full week...then when questioned on Thursday at DC - she said she flew there!! Wow.
*She changed her original story in 2012 from 4 guys down to 2 guys a few months ago
*Her main witness Keyser has retained a lawyer and admantly denies any party ever happening, completely contradicting Ford

*The other accusers are just as bad.
*And one of the accusers is under criminal investigation by the FBI for completely making up a claim about Kavanaugh raping a woman on a boat...How much lower can the Democrats go [who knows they are rock bottom already]

[Anonymous]

Kavanaugh is a bit like Trump--with the multiple sexual assault allegations and the lies that can be easily disproven. He even lied about getting into Yale "with no connections" when he was actually a legacy.

https://www.newsweek.com/kavanaugh-said-he-had-no-connections-yale-he-was-legacy-student-1145286
KAVANAUGH SAID HE HAD 'NO CONNECTIONS' TO YALE. HE WAS, IN FACT, A LEGACY STUDENT

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh said underoath that he had “no connections” to Yale prior to attending, arguing that hard work and ambition were the sole factors leading him to study at the prestigious institution of higher education.

However, that statement is verifiably untrue. In fact, Kavanaugh would be classified as a legacy student, because his grandfather Everett Edward Kavanaugh also attended Yale as an undergraduate student, The Intercept reported on Saturday, sharing an image of a 1928 yearbook.

“I have no connections there. I got there by busting my tail,” Kavanaugh, who currently serves as a federal judge, said while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.