+1 Agree - it is not just Arlington that seems somewhat saturated by entitled bullies. I feel bad for him, if he is lucky he can get out of that toxic and environment, and turn a profit for that beautiful house. The house is not my taste, and maybe the bushes are not, but that is not my business, any more than it should be any of his neighbors business. Wonder what kind of history this property had, and if that neighborhood has an unfavorable reputation that precedes that new house. |
|
| I can't understand the neighbors, thinking that they are "plant experts", and that argument having anything to do with anything, really. He can plants whatever he wants. Nothing has to do with the other. They should not be destroying property that is not theirs. Period. |
| Why is it your right to let your dog piss and crap on someone’s yard? Our neighbors unleashed dog would escape the fence and pee on my tomato plants. Of course we had been eating those cherry tomatoes not realizing that the dog was periodically doing this. When I mentioned it to them nicely, they said “he’s a dog!” |
These types of people shouldn't live in urban / suburban areas. Doesn't matter what the owner plants in his yard, the neighbors are apparently fine with the dogs destroying it. One of our neighbors likes to let their dog take a huge crap in different driveways in the early mornings, so it doesn't surprise me what these dog owners will do. |
GTFOOH--you are a clown. A lien on their house for the dog peeing on his lawn?
|
Harassment, fool. Not the dog peeing, but the neighbors reactions to what is happening. Ie: the antagonistic neighbors who think they are flying under the radar, usually under the guise of "respectability", and/or plausible deniability, but very much are not. It may or may not pertain here. There are attorneys that specialize. |
+1 Not only that, some neighbors think it is their God given right, because "Murica. |
100% and I am less familiar with how it works in the 'burbs, but here very many people plant in front of their homes and it is generally respected. Where I think this guy is towing the line, is that he is planting almost exactly on the line between the public sidewalk and his own personal property by planting almost right against a sidewalk. No one should destroy property that is not theirs, but he is AWFULLY close to public property. If his shrubs had survived they would have arguably been in public space. And yes, he made a horticulural mistake and seems to not have it out for dogs on shrubs but also 18 month olds picking up pebbles near his home so...not winning hearts and minds. |
Harassment? Please. You must be a lawyer. |
|
Wait, what? Just because he lives in a denser area means others have the right to use his yard as a toilet?
Who are the lazy aholes who actually think this? Your dogs should be taken away from you, because you're clearly too irresponsible to own an animal. |
That's a little dramatic. |
| I sympathize with this guy. I bought a house on a corner lot that is heavily trafficked by dog walkers and they seem to think my yard is fair game for whatever their dogs feel like doing. No, one dog peeing on a shrub is not a big deal. But when all the neighborhood dogs come by and pee on that shrub repeatedly, day after day, one might feel the need to deter. |
Or put up a fence... |
| Team plant guy. And I think racist here also. I would like to reach out to plant guy and say there are other ways to protect your bushes from those awful fog people. |