Official Abortion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile Jane Roe (real name Norma McCorvey) became prolife after her case was won and a huge supporter of the defenseless child.

Completely irrelevant. I used to be a brainwashed "pro life " Catholic. I'm no longer.

[Anonymous]

Which is worse - 1 in 4 AA babies aborted or 1 in 5 AA babies aborted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....

"convenience"? No changing your mind with a perspective like that.

look at the chart earlier. Rarely is it ever for medical reasons - mostly it's for convenience.

Only if you think being 14, or being in a domestic violence situation, or being below the federal property line with no way to support a child are mere “inconveniences”.

Even if you eliminate that, look at the other reasons. Still overwhelmingly for convenience.

No, it’s not. You are just using a chart that misrepresents what happens by using euphemism and cross counting women. I’m not sure why you cropped out the line under the graph that says one woman could be counted in multiple categories. Oh wait. I do know why you did. It doesn’t suit your narrative.

So a woman who has health problems could also be counted in too poor. Done with childbearing also often correlates with too poor under “we can’t afford the kids we have, let alone add another child”.

Maternal and fetal health 7%
Can’t afford— 25%
“Lack of maturity” (teenagers) 8%
“Relationship issues” (often code for domestic violence). 9%

“Not ready”— cross counts with teens, and can’t afford
School and career concerns (often overlaps with teens) 4%

Your chart is a joke. Quit using it to prove a point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....

Embryos and fetuses aren't people you weirdo.

Yes they are. Alabama is protecting them. Sorry.

What are they? cows? dogs?

They're people.

They're zygots, blastocysts, embryos, fetuses with the potential to one day be a person.

Not a person:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I say hit these states with these laws in the pocket book. Protest major sporting events and the like. Send letters to Dean's of selective universities.

I have seen on DCUM that several kids have crossed Emory off their list. GT is there for engineering. There are no selective colleges in Alabama. Because it’s a cesspool and no one wants to live there. If it didn’t have NASA, it would be Mississippi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - 1 in 4 AA babies aborted or 1 in 5 AA babies aborted?

Depends on how you define worse. But 1 in 4 is greater than 1 in 5. For the math impaired Alabama loving morons.

[Anonymous]

Every child deserves to be wanted.

[Anonymous]

I'm so tired of white men punishing women for having the anatomy they have. The misogyny of forcing women to remain pregnant and force birth is unreal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - 1 in 4 AA babies aborted or 1 in 5 AA babies aborted?

Depends on how you define worse. But 1 in 4 is greater than 1 in 5. For the math impaired Alabama loving morons.

Don’t you mean which is better?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every child deserves to be wanted.

But not every sperm, egg, blastocyst, embryo, or fetus. These things are not children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I say hit these states with these laws in the pocket book. Protest major sporting events and the like. Send letters to Dean's of selective universities.

I have seen on DCUM that several kids have crossed Emory off their list. GT is there for engineering. There are no selective colleges in Alabama. Because it’s a cesspool and no one wants to live there. If it didn’t have NASA, it would be Mississippi.

More foreign students can get into Emory and keep the rankings high. American kids dilute tech school rankings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - 1 in 4 AA babies aborted or 1 in 5 AA babies aborted?

Depends on how you define worse. But 1 in 4 is greater than 1 in 5. For the math impaired Alabama loving morons.

Which is worse - apathy towards murder or apathy towards abortion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Ah my hero. The great Eugenicist, Margaret Sanger. Please do one for Eleanor Roosevelt, too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every child deserves to be wanted.

I absolutely agree. Which is precisely why I support abortion rights. If you want to bring a child into this world, that's wonderful! If you don't want a child, terminating that pregnancy can be the kindest thing you do, to avoid bringing even more unwanted children into this world.