Pence on working moms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems like a particularly relevant political statement to discuss on DCUM:

Mike Pence argued in 1997 that "day-care kids get the short end of the emotional stick" and that households with two working parents lead to "stunted emotional growth."

Well Hillary Clinton must have heeded his advice. She was a SAHM during that time period, and Chelsea Clinton seems okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like a particularly relevant political statement to discuss on DCUM:

Mike Pence argued in 1997 that "day-care kids get the short end of the emotional stick" and that households with two working parents lead to "stunted emotional growth."

Well Hillary Clinton must have heeded his advice. She was a SAHM during that time period, and Chelsea Clinton seems okay.

Do you really believe that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like a particularly relevant political statement to discuss on DCUM:

Mike Pence argued in 1997 that "day-care kids get the short end of the emotional stick" and that households with two working parents lead to "stunted emotional growth."

Well Hillary Clinton must have heeded his advice. She was a SAHM during that time period, and Chelsea Clinton seems okay.

?
"First Lady" is not synonymous with "SAHM."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

Parent of the year award medals to both you & your DH.

[Anonymous]

"I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession, which I entered before my husband was in public life,"

Is that really how Hillary Clinton sees the role of a SAHM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

Parent of the year award medals to both you & your DH.

Total troll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession, which I entered before my husband was in public life,"

Is that really how Hillary Clinton sees the role of a SAHM?

Yes she does. She has nothing but contempt for women who are SAHMs. Oddly enough, her daughter stays at home with her children. Seems to be the pattern for children neglected by their mothers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

You are a loathsome gold digger and no child should ever have been put I your care. I hope they know why you adopted them and both hate you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

You are a loathsome gold digger and no child should ever have been put I your care. I hope they know why you adopted them and both hate you.

Folks, this is satire. And pretty good. Even in DC, no one is this shallow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

You are a loathsome gold digger and no child should ever have been put I your care. I hope they know why you adopted them and both hate you.

Folks, this is satire. And pretty good. Even in DC, no one is this shallow.

But you don't need to live here to be on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The anti-daycare trolls are hilarious

Agree. I adopted two kids so that DH and I would get the same inheritance from my family as my sister did. Without the kids we would have received $5 million less. It is more than enough to pay nannies and keep them away from us. Since parents are also funding their education, they cost us little.

You are a loathsome gold digger and no child should ever have been put I your care. I hope they know why you adopted them and both hate you.

Folks, this is satire. And pretty good. Even in DC, no one is this shallow.

But you don't need to live here to be on DCUM.

You clearly need to be smarter to be on DCUM if you didn't recognize the clearly sarcastic post.